Optimized Parametric Variable Radius Sampling Scheme for 3D Cartesian k-Space Undersampling Pattern Design
Zechen Zhou1, Shuo Chen1, Aiqi Sun1, Yunduo Li1, Rui Li1, and Chun Yuan1,2

1Center for Biomedical Imaging Research, Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, People's Republic of, 2Vascular Imaging Laboratory, Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, United States

Synopsis

A parametric variable radius sampling scheme termed Cartesian Under-Sampling with Target Ordering Method (CUSTOM) was introduced for undersampling pattern design to better match the total number of sampling points with the given acceleration factor in 3D Cartesian imaging application. With the same joint parallel imaging and compressed sensing image reconstruction method, parameter optimized CUSTOM has demonstrated its enhanced performance particularly for detail image information restoration in comparison to several undersampling pattern design schemes, as well as its generalization ability in different applications. The prospective experiment validated the feasibility of CUSTOM in clinical settings.

Introduction

The subsampled data in 3D Cartesian k-space can be restored by using combined parallel imaging (PI)1,2 and compressed sensing (CS)3 image reconstruction methods. In the case of same acceleration factor (AF), different choices of undersampling pattern in k-space also have a large effect on the accuracy of image estimation. Variable density Poisson Disk Sampling (vd-PDS) pattern4 can provide a good compromise between local and global sampling distribution in k-space which are beneficial for PI and CS respectively. However, the minimum radius parameter is usually difficult to perfectly match the given AF in 3D Cartesian imaging and the optimization of variable density scheme is also demanded. For these purposes, a parametric variable radius sampling scheme, termed Cartesian Under-Sampling with Target Ordering Method (CUSTOM), was presented in this study and investigated in both retrospective and prospective experiments.

Methods

Parametric Variable Radius Sampling: Given the current sample position (kys,kzs), a parametric weight function w(ky,kz) centered at (kys,kzs) is constructed to approximate the local support effect within a circular neighborhood defined by radius r(kys,kzs). Once (kys,kzs) is labeled as sampled position, the weights of all positions are updated. The k-space position with minimum weight among all unsampled positions is determined as the next sample position. Repeat this weight ordering process can sequentially generate a sampling mask matched with AF requirement as shown in figure 1. This sampling process can maintain a consistently effective interpolation condition within local k-space regions for PI reconstruction. To make the global k-space sampling density preferable to CS reconstruction, the radius r(ky,kz) is defined as a spatially variant function indicating variable density sampling. In this study, generalized Gaussian function was exploited for definition of w(ky,kz) and r(ky,kz), where (αl, βl)/(αg, βg) was a pair of scale and shape parameters belonging to function w(ky,kz)/r(ky,kz). αl/αg can be determined by βl/βg given the decay threshold/radius magnification. Therefore, further optimization for βl and βg parameters can be implemented to balance the local and global characteristics of sampling distribution. Image Reconstruction: STEP5 with optimized Gaussian mixture model regularization6 was used in this study as one typical combination of calibrationless PI7 and CS image reconstruction method. Normalized Root Mean Square Error (nRMSE) and mean Structural SIMilarity index (mSSIM)8 were exploited as two criterions for quantitative image quality measurement. Data Acquisition: To optimize parameters in CUSTOM and compare the impact of different undersampling patterns, a 3D isotropic 0.8mm T1 weighted joint intra- and extracranial dataset9 was fully acquired on a Philips Achieva 3.0T TX scanner (Philips Healthcare, Best, Netherland) with dedicated 36-channel neurovascular coil10. Another 8-channel T1 weighted brain dataset was obtained from author’s webpage11, in order to evaluate the generalization ability of the previously optimized CUSTOM. In addition, a prospectively subsampled large coverage 3D-MERGE scan10 was performed to demonstrate the feasibility of CUSTOM in practical usage.

Results and Discussion

Figure 2 showed that a combination of βl = 0.22 and βg = 0.33 can provide more accurate and stable reconstruction result. This optimized CUSTOM was further compared with uniform PDS11, variable density random sampling3, VDRad12 methods and figure 3 demonstrated that a better tradeoff between local and global sampling distribution characteristics can improve the quality of image reconstruction. The similar comparison was performed on another brain dataset, but the central area of 30x30 in k-space was fully acquired in order to compare the impact of different undersampling patterns in high-spatial-frequency area. In figure 4, it indicated that the peripheral undersampling pattern of CUSTOM can improve the detail image information restoration although the overall accuracy measurements are similar among different undersampling patterns. Furthermore, it showed that this parametric optimization had certain generalization ability in different applications. Figure 5 illustrated that similar vessel wall delineation can be retrieved from a prospectively AF = 4 subsampled dataset in comparison to the fully sampled reference.

Conclusion

In this work, we presented a parametric variable radius sampling scheme called CUSTOM that can be optimized to design improved undersampling pattern for joint PI and CS image reconstruction, providing a good matching between total number of sampling points and the expected AF in 3D Cartesian imaging. Arbitrary parametric function can be used as weight and radius function in CUSTOM. Considering generalized Gaussian function as one specific implementation, experimental results demonstrated that optimized CUSTOM undersampling pattern can improve the accuracy of image estimation particularly the detail information. Also, the feasibility of CUSTOM for prospective undersampling has been validated.

Acknowledgements

No acknowledgement found.

References

1. Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB, et al. SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med. 1999;42:952-962.

2. Griswold MA, Jakob PM, Heidemann RM, et al. Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn Reson Med. 2002;47:1202-1210.

3. Lustig M, Donoho D, Pauly JM. Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2007;58:1182-1195.

4. Vasanawala SS, Murphy M, Alley M, et al. Practical parallel imaging compressed sensing MRI: summary of two years of experience in accelerating body MRI of pediatric patients. Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging. 2011;2011:1039-1043.

5. Zhou Z, Wang J, Balu N, et al. STEP: Self-supporting tailored k-space estimation for parallel imaging reconstruction. Magn Reson Med. 2015 Mar 11. Epub.

6. Zhou Z, Balu N, Li R, et al. MR Image Reconstruction with Optimized Gaussian Mixture Model for Structured Sparsity. In Proceedings of ISMRM 2015, p3416.

7. Shin PJ, Larson PE, Ohliger MA, et al. Calibrationless parallel imaging reconstruction based on structured low-rank matrix completion. Magn Reson Med. 2014;72:959-970.

8. Wang Z, Bovik AC, Sheikh HR, et al. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2004;13:600-612.

9. Xie Y, Yang Q, Xie G, et al. Improved black-blood imaging using DANTE-SPACE for simultaneous carotid and intracranial vessel wall evaluation. Magn Reson Med. 2015 Jul 8. Epub.

10. Zhou Z, Li R, Zhao X, et al. Evaluation of 3D multi-contrast joint intra- and extracranial vessel wall cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2015;17:41.

11. Lustig M, Pauly JM. SPIRiT: Iterative self-consistent parallel imaging reconstruction from arbitrary k-space. Magn Reson Med. 2010;64:457-471.

12. Cheng JY, Zhang T, Ruangwattanapaisarn N, et al. Free-breathing pediatric MRI with nonrigid motion correction and acceleration. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015;42:407-420.

Figures

Figure 1. Diagram of sequential sampling process in CUSTOM.

Figure 2. Optimization result of βl and βg parameters with x10 bicubic interpolation. Different combination of βl and βg are used in CUSTOM to generate sampling mask for 10 times with AF = 5 and reconstruction accuracy is evaluated by nRMSE(a,b) and mSSIM(c,d) measurements.

Figure 3. Comparison of different undersampling patterns at AF = 5 for intra- (a) and extracranial (b) image reconstruction results. The nRMSE and mSSIM measurements are also provided at the bottom.

Figure 4. Comparison of different undersampling patterns at AF = 5 for brain image reconstruction results. Both zoom-in views and overall quantitative accuracy measurements (nRMSE and mSSIM) are provided.

Figure 5. Prospective undersampling experiment with CUSTOM method at AF = 4 (top middle) for joint intra- and extracranial imaging. Zero filled (middle column) and reconstructed (right column) results from one coronal slice are compared with a similar slice from another fully sampled scan (left column).



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
1818