Synopsis
A
parametric variable radius sampling scheme termed Cartesian Under-Sampling with
Target Ordering Method (CUSTOM) was introduced for undersampling pattern design
to better match the total number of sampling points with the given acceleration
factor in 3D Cartesian imaging application. With the same joint parallel
imaging and compressed sensing image reconstruction method, parameter optimized
CUSTOM has demonstrated its enhanced performance particularly for detail image
information restoration in comparison to several undersampling pattern design
schemes, as well as its generalization ability in different applications. The
prospective experiment validated the feasibility of CUSTOM in clinical
settings.Introduction
The
subsampled data in 3D Cartesian k-space can be restored by using combined parallel
imaging (PI)
1,2 and compressed sensing (CS)
3 image
reconstruction methods. In the case of same acceleration factor (AF), different
choices of undersampling pattern in k-space also have a large effect on the accuracy
of image estimation. Variable density Poisson Disk Sampling (vd-PDS) pattern
4
can provide a good compromise between local and global sampling distribution in
k-space which are beneficial for PI and CS respectively. However,
the minimum radius parameter is usually difficult to perfectly match the given
AF in 3D Cartesian imaging and the optimization of variable density scheme is also
demanded. For these purposes, a parametric
variable radius sampling scheme, termed Cartesian Under-Sampling with Target
Ordering Method (CUSTOM), was presented in this study and investigated in both retrospective
and prospective experiments.
Methods
Parametric Variable Radius Sampling: Given the current sample position (k
ys,k
zs),
a parametric weight function w(k
y,k
z) centered at (k
ys,k
zs)
is constructed to approximate the local support effect within a circular
neighborhood defined by radius r(k
ys,k
zs).
Once (k
ys,k
zs) is labeled as
sampled position, the weights of all positions are updated. The k-space
position with minimum weight among all unsampled positions is determined as the
next sample position. Repeat this weight ordering process can sequentially
generate a sampling mask matched with AF requirement as shown in figure 1. This sampling process can maintain
a consistently effective interpolation condition within local k-space regions for
PI reconstruction. To make the global k-space sampling density preferable to CS
reconstruction, the radius r(k
y,k
z) is defined as a
spatially variant function indicating variable density sampling. In this study,
generalized Gaussian function was exploited for definition of w(k
y,k
z)
and r(k
y,k
z), where (
αl,
βl)/(
αg,
βg) was a pair of scale and shape
parameters belonging to function w(k
y,k
z)/r(k
y,k
z).
αl/
αg can be determined by
βl/
βg
given the decay threshold/radius magnification. Therefore, further optimization
for
βl and
βg parameters can be implemented to balance the
local and global characteristics of sampling distribution.
Image Reconstruction: STEP
5 with optimized
Gaussian mixture model regularization
6 was used in this study as one
typical combination of calibrationless PI
7 and CS image reconstruction method. Normalized
Root Mean Square Error (nRMSE) and mean Structural SIMilarity index (mSSIM)
8
were exploited as two criterions for quantitative image quality measurement.
Data Acquisition: To optimize
parameters in CUSTOM and compare the impact of different undersampling patterns,
a 3D isotropic 0.8mm T1 weighted joint intra- and extracranial dataset
9 was fully
acquired on a Philips Achieva
3.0T TX scanner (Philips Healthcare, Best, Netherland) with dedicated
36-channel neurovascular coil
10. Another 8-channel T1 weighted brain dataset was
obtained from author’s webpage
11, in order to evaluate the
generalization ability of the previously optimized CUSTOM. In addition, a
prospectively subsampled large coverage 3D-MERGE scan
10 was
performed to demonstrate the feasibility of CUSTOM in practical usage.
Results
and Discussion
Figure 2 showed that a combination of
βl
= 0.22 and
βg = 0.33 can provide more accurate and stable
reconstruction result. This optimized CUSTOM was further compared with uniform
PDS
11, variable density random sampling
3, VDRad
12
methods and figure 3 demonstrated that a better tradeoff between local and
global sampling distribution characteristics can improve the quality of image
reconstruction. The similar comparison was performed on another brain dataset,
but the central area of 30x30 in k-space was fully acquired in order to compare
the impact of different undersampling patterns in high-spatial-frequency area.
In figure 4, it indicated that the peripheral undersampling pattern of CUSTOM
can improve the detail image information restoration although the overall
accuracy measurements are similar among different undersampling patterns.
Furthermore, it showed that this parametric optimization had certain
generalization ability in different applications. Figure
5 illustrated that similar vessel wall delineation can be retrieved from a prospectively
AF = 4 subsampled dataset in comparison to the fully sampled reference.
Conclusion
In
this work, we presented a parametric variable radius sampling scheme called CUSTOM
that can be optimized to design improved undersampling pattern for joint PI and
CS image reconstruction, providing
a good matching between total number of sampling points and the expected AF in
3D Cartesian imaging. Arbitrary parametric function can be used as weight
and radius function in CUSTOM. Considering generalized Gaussian function as one
specific implementation, experimental results demonstrated that optimized
CUSTOM undersampling pattern can improve the accuracy of image estimation particularly
the detail information. Also, the feasibility of CUSTOM for prospective
undersampling has been validated.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Pruessmann KP, Weiger M, Scheidegger MB,
et al. SENSE: sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magn Reson Med. 1999;42:952-962.
2. Griswold MA, Jakob PM, Heidemann RM, et
al. Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn
Reson Med. 2002;47:1202-1210.
3. Lustig M, Donoho D, Pauly JM. Sparse
MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging. Magn Reson
Med. 2007;58:1182-1195.
4. Vasanawala SS, Murphy M, Alley M, et al.
Practical parallel imaging compressed sensing MRI: summary of two years of
experience in accelerating body MRI of pediatric patients. Proc IEEE Int Symp
Biomed Imaging. 2011;2011:1039-1043.
5. Zhou Z, Wang J, Balu N, et al. STEP: Self-supporting tailored k-space estimation for parallel imaging reconstruction. Magn Reson Med. 2015 Mar 11. Epub.
6. Zhou Z, Balu N, Li R, et al. MR Image Reconstruction with Optimized Gaussian Mixture Model for Structured Sparsity. In Proceedings of ISMRM 2015, p3416.
7. Shin PJ, Larson PE, Ohliger MA, et al. Calibrationless parallel imaging reconstruction based on structured low-rank matrix completion. Magn Reson Med. 2014;72:959-970.
8. Wang Z, Bovik AC, Sheikh HR, et al. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2004;13:600-612.
9. Xie Y, Yang Q, Xie G, et al. Improved
black-blood imaging using DANTE-SPACE for simultaneous carotid and intracranial
vessel wall evaluation. Magn Reson Med. 2015 Jul 8. Epub.
10. Zhou Z, Li R, Zhao X, et al. Evaluation
of 3D multi-contrast joint intra- and extracranial vessel wall cardiovascular
magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2015;17:41.
11. Lustig M, Pauly JM. SPIRiT: Iterative self-consistent parallel imaging reconstruction from arbitrary k-space. Magn Reson Med. 2010;64:457-471.
12.
Cheng JY, Zhang T, Ruangwattanapaisarn N, et al. Free-breathing pediatric MRI with nonrigid
motion correction and acceleration. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015;42:407-420.