Hernan Jara1, Arnaud Guidon2, Jorge A Soto1, and Osamu Sakai1
1Radiology, Boston University, Boston, MA, United States, 2Global MR Applications and Workflow, GE Healthcare, Boston, MA, United States
Synopsis
Purpose: To
describe the quadra fast spin-echo (quadra-FSE) pulse sequence, which is the
concatenation of two dual-echo FSE acquisitions differing only in TR and to describe
the matching qMRI algorithms for mapping T1, T2, and PD. Methods: quadra-FSE was tested at 3T
with a multi-compartment agarose phantom and relaxometry was compared to gold
standard relaxometry scans using qMRI algorithms developed in house. Results: PD, T1, and T2 maps generated
with the quadra-FSE scans are accurate and of excellent image quality. Conclusion: Concatenation of two DE-FSE
scans with different TRs can be used for combined and accurate PD, T1,
and T2 mapping.Introduction
Recent interest in the development of multispectral (MS-)
qMRI pulse sequences (1-10)
has been motivated by the increasing awareness of the clinical benefits afforded
by: a) continuous contrast navigation via on-demand MR image synthesis, and b)
the improved diagnostic accuracy possible with tissue integrity and hydration
measurements; e.g. by the relaxation
times (T1, T2) and the water-normalized proton density
(PD). Therefore, there is great need for platform-independent MS-qMRI pulse
sequences that are scantime efficient and produce superior image quality. Here
we report the development of the quadra fast spin-echo (quadra-FSE), which is
the concatenation of two dual-echo FSE acquisitions differing solely in the
repetition time (Figure 1) and
describe the theoretical underpinnings of the accompanying qMRI algorithms for
mapping T1, T2, and PD. In addition, we validate the
quantitative accuracy of this dual-saturation and dual-echo FSE pulse sequence
and the corresponding qMRI algorithms, with a multi-compartment qMRI phantom (Figure 2) independently calibrated with the
reference “gold standard” conventional pulse sequences for T1
(multi-TI inversion recovery single-shot-FSE) and multi-TE conventional spin
echo for T2.
Methods and Materials
All qMRI algorithms were programmed in Mathcad (PTC, Needham,
MA). The T1 mapping algorithm
is based on the T1-implicit equation:
see Eq. 1 in Figure 4
which
leads to a root-finding problem solvable the Ridder and Brent numerical methods
(standard Mathcad functions);
is the pixel value ratio between the first
echoes of each DE-FSE acquisition and the function F is given by (11,
12):
see Eq. 2 in Figure 4
The T2
mapping algorithm combines the exact dual-echo formula applicable for short and
intermediate T2 values and a maximum-likelihood algorithm valid for
long T2s. Finally, the PD mapping algorithm is based on the
principle of pulse sequence relaxation time unweighting (T1 and T2),
followed by low spatial frequency demodulation to correct for receiver coil
profile inhomogeneities, and pixel value calibration relative to water. Phantom experimentation was performed at room
temperature (20±0.5ºC) using a 3T clinical scanner (Discovery MR750w, GE
Healthcare, Waukesha, WI).
Results
The logical
architecture of the MS-qMRI algorithms is shown in the flowchart of Figure 3.
The top row shows the four directly acquired images per slice generated by the
quadra-FSE pulse sequence; these are labelled as Sat1_E1&2 and
Sat2_E1&2. In the current implementation, Sat1_E1 and Sat2_E1 are used for T1
mapping via Eq. 1. Furthermore, Sat2_E1 and Sat2_E2 are used for T2
mapping. In the final steps, the residual T1 and T2
weightings of the Sat1_E1 image are reversed, the low spatial frequencies are
demodulated, and the pixel values are normalized to that of water. Typical
resulting maps are displayed in the bottom row. Additionally, the quadra-FSE T1
and T2 values are in very good agreement (within 10%) with the
reference values afforded the gold standard conventional multi-TI and multi-TE
conventional pulse sequences.
Conclusion
A new MS-qMRI pulse sequence and accompanying mapping T1,
T2, and PD algorithms have been developed. This pulse sequence
termed quadra-FSE is simple, does not use inversion pulses which are prone to
flip angle errors, is scan-time efficient, and nearly platform independent.
This work could have implications for synthetic MRI, clinical and research
applications of qMRI, and for correlation time diffusion MRI.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by a research grant from GE HeathcareReferences
1. Schmitt P, Griswold MA, Jakob PM,
et al. Inversion recovery TrueFISP: quantification of T(1), T(2), and spin
density. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2004;51(4):661-7.
2. Farraher
SW, Jara H, Chang KJ, Hou A, Soto JA. Liver and spleen volumetry with
quantitative MR imaging and dual-space clustering segmentation. Radiology. 2005;237(1):322-8.
3. Suzuki S,
Sakai O, Jara H. Combined volumetric T1, T2 and secular-T2 quantitative MRI of
the brain: age-related global changes (preliminary results). Magn Reson
Imaging. 2006;24(7):877-87.
4. Warntjes
JB, Dahlqvist O, Lundberg P. Novel method for rapid, simultaneous T1, T*2, and
proton density quantification. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
2007;57(3):528-37.
5. Deoni SC,
Rutt BK, Arun T, Pierpaoli C, Jones DK. Gleaning multicomponent T1 and T2
information from steady-state imaging data. Magn Reson Med. 2008;60(6):1372-87.
6. Saito N,
Sakai O, Ozonoff A, Jara H. Relaxo-volumetric multispectral quantitative
magnetic resonance imaging of the brain over the human lifespan: global and
regional aging patterns. Magn Reson Imaging. 2009;27(7):895-906.
7. Liu X, Feng
Y, Lu ZR, Morrell G, Jeong EK. Rapid simultaneous acquisition of T1 and T2
mapping images using multishot double spin echo EPI and automated variations of
TR and TE (ms DSEPI T12). NMR in Biomedicine. 2010;23(1):97-104.
8. Newbould
RD, Skare ST, Alley MT, Gold GE, Bammer R. Three-dimensional T1, T2 and proton
density mapping with inversion recovery balanced SSFP. Magnetic resonance
imaging. 2010;28(9):1374-82.
9. Ehses P,
Seiberlich N, Ma D, et al. IR TrueFISP with a golden-ratio-based radial
readout: Fast quantification of T1, T2, and proton density. Magnetic Resonance
in Medicine. 2012:n/a-n/a.
10. Weiskopf N,
Suckling J, Williams G, et al. Quantitative multi-parameter mapping of R1,
PD(*), MT, and R2(*) at 3T: a multi-center validation. Frontiers in
Neuroscience. 2013;7:95.
11. Lee JN,
Riederer SJ. A modified saturation-recovery approximation for multiple
spin-echo pulse sequences. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 1986;3(1):132-4.
12. Rydberg JN, Riederer SJ, Rydberg CH, Jack CR. Contrast
optimization of fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (flair) imaging. Magnetic
Resonance in Medicine. 1995;34(6):868-77.