Synopsis
Ultrashort
echo-time imaging has been explored for the study of short T2* tissues. Most ultrashort TE sequences utilize 3D
radial center-out k-space sampling. While
they are potentially useful for many important applications, they are susceptible to various
image artifacts. This abstract describes
the appearances, causes and mitigations of some potential artifacts, which include
those caused by long readout length, high gradient field, insufficient number of
radial projections, off-centered imaging and signal wrap-around. An understanding of these artifacts
will help in protocol setting and the identification of related problems. This article should benefit the users of
ultrashort TE imaging.Purpose
In
recent years, ultrashort echo-time imaging has been explored for the study of
short T2* tissues inside the body
1,2. While the technique has been implemented in a
number of different pulse sequences, most ultrashort TE sequences are based on
3D radial center-out k-space sampling that involves the acquisition of data
along large numbers of evenly spaced radial projections. These sequences include UTE
3, PETRA
4 and ZTE
5, with PETRA and ZTE being different from UTE in
that the readout gradient is switched on before RF excitation, resulting in
silent scanning and shorter encoding time.
Though these sequences have been shown to be potentially useful for
important clinical and research applications, they are susceptible to various image
artifacts that may significantly degrade the image quality. Our purpose is to describe the appearances,
causes and mitigations of some potential artifacts.
Outline of Content
The images used for illustrations in this paper were acquired
using UTE and PETRA sequences obtained from Siemens Healthcare as work-in-progress
sequences.
1) Image blurring due to long readout length
The readout length in each radial projection equals the time
between successive data points multiplied by the number of acquired data points
in the projection. It is inversely related
to the readout bandwidth per pixel. While
a longer readout length allows higher image resolution, it may lead to image
blurring due to T2* decay. The optimal readout
length is approximately the T2* value of the desired tissue 6. Severe image blurring can occur if the
readout length is several times longer than T2*, which may be reduced by increasing
the bandwidth per pixel (Fig. 1).
2) Image blurring and non-uniform signal due to high readout
gradient field
For sequences such as PETRA and ZTE that have the readout
gradient field turned on before RF excitation, the RF pulse must fully and uniformly
cover the large bandwidth generated by the gradient 7. Otherwise, there will be reduced excitation
to the outer FOV at high spatial frequencies, causing image blurring and signal
non-uniformity in those regions (Fig. 2).
Therefore, the readout gradient should be set low to avoid these
artifacts. However, for a given image resolution,
a lower gradient translates to lower bandwidth and longer readout length that
may lead to its own artifacts as mentioned earlier. Consequently, a trade-off among the related parameters
may be needed.
3) Imaging blurring due to insufficient number of radial
projections
Insufficient number of radial projections leads to image
blurring (Fig. 3). In radial sampling, the
image resolution is determined by the number of sample points per radial
projections and the number of radial projections. The reconstructed image matrix size does not
necessarily represent the intrinsic image resolution. To satisfy the Nyquist criterion for 3D
radial sampling, large numbers of radial projections are often required 8,9. For example, 237,739 radial projections are
needed for a 2563 image matrix 9. This may result in long scan time, even with
the minimum TR. However, depending on the
specific applications, satisfactory results may be obtained by acquiring only a
fraction of the theoretical number of projections 4,9.
4. Artifacts caused by off-centered imaging
For applications that require the FOV to be off-centered in
the magnet, the shift from iso-center is corrected through image
reconstruction. However, there are associated
artifacts that increase with the amount of off-center shift, and they become
severe if the shift is more than 50% of the FOV in length (Fig. 4). To minimize the artifacts, the FOV should be
kept as close to iso-center as possible.
5. Wrap-around artifacts
In order to achieve the shortest possible TE, ultrashort TE
sequences often employ 3D nonselective excitation that is vulnerable to
wrap-around artifacts caused by signal outside the FOV. Sequences such as UTE utilize radial data oversampling
and avoid wrap-around artifacts in all directions. Sequences that do not use oversampling or
selective excitation, such as PETRA, are subjected to wrap-around artifacts
(Fig. 5a). Besides peripheral body parts,
RF coil materials can also produce signals (Fig. 5b) that may wrap around into the
imaged tissues. When phased array coils,
such as a spine coil, are used with these sequences, wrap-around artifacts may
be controlled by limiting the signal coverage through coil element selection.
Summary
While
this paper does not cover all possible artifacts associated with ultrashort TE
imaging, the artifacts discussed represent some of the commonly encountered ones. An understanding of these artifacts
will help in the setting up of protocols and the identification of related imaging
problems. This paper should benefit the users
of ultrashort TE imaging techniques.
Acknowledgements
The author would like to thank Dr. Neils Oesingmann, Dr. David Grodski and Dr. Taka Natsuaki of Siemens Healthcare for their assistance in obtaining the ultrashort TE sequences used in this paper.References
1. Chang EY, Du J, Chung CB. UTE imaging in the
musculoskeletal system. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015;41(4):870-883.
2. Ma W, Sheikh K, Svenningsen S, et al. Ultra-short
echo-time pulmonary MRI: evaluation and reproducibility in COPD subjects with
and without bronchiectasis. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015;41(5):1465-1474.
3. Robson MD, Gatehouse MD, Bydder M, Bydder GM. Magnetic
resonance: an introduction to ultrashort TE (UTE) imaging. J Comp Assist Tomogr
2003;27:824-846.
4. Grodzki DM, Jakob PM, Heismann B. Ultrashort echo time
imaging using pointwise encoding time reduction with radial acquisition
(PETRA). Magn Reson Med. 2012;67(2):510-518.
5. Weiger M, Pruessmann KP, Hennel F. MRI with zero echo
time: hard versus sweep pulse excitation. Magn Reson Med. 2011;66(2):379-389.
6. Weiger M, Brunner DO, Tabbert M, et al. Exploring the bandwidth
limits of ZTE imaging: Spatial response, out-of-band signals, and noise
propogation. Magn Reson Med. 2015;74(5):1236-1247.
7. Grodzki DM, Jakob PM, Heismann B. Correcting slice
selectivity in hard pulse sequences. J Magn Reson. 2012;214(1):61-67.
8. Tyler DJ, Robson MD, Henkelman RM, et al. Magnetic
resonance imaging with ultrashort TE (UTE) PULSE sequences: technical
considerations. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;25(2):279-289.
9. Wilbur BS, Hasan KM, Alexander AL, Parker DL.
Optimal Sampling for 3D Projection Reconstruction Imaging. Proc. Intl. Soc.
Mag. Reson. Med. 9 (2001), p682.