Satoshi ITO1, Shungo YASAKA1, and Yoshifumi YAMADA1
1Information and Controls Systems Sciences, Utsunomiya University, Utsunomiya, Japan
Synopsis
In this paper, we
propose a new fast image reconstruction method in which a regularly
undersampled signal is used instead of random sampling, as is used in
compressed sensing. To diffuse the aliasing artifact caused by under-sampling,
we adopt phase-scrambling Fourier transform imaging. The proposed method has an
advantage over CS in that the quality of the image does not depend on the
selection of the sampling trajectory. Simulation studies and experiments show
that the proposed method has almost the same peak signal-to-noise ratio as that
of a compressed sensing reconstruction.Purpose
We have proposed a new fast
image reconstruction method in which a regularly undersampled signal is used
instead of random sampling
1. Proposed method has the advantage that obtained image
quality do not depend on the randomness of signal under-sampling. In the clinical
imaging, a rapid spatial phase variations are sometimes imposed on the reconstructed
image. In this paper, further
examination about the experimental and reconstruction parameters considering spatial phase
variation is performed to improve the practical use of proposed method.
Methods
In
the proposed method, phase-scrambling Fourier transform imaging (PSFT)2 in which a quadratic phase scrambling is added to the conventional
FT imaging is adopted.
$$v(k_x,k_y)=
\int \hspace{-2.0mm} \int^{\infty}_{-\infty}
\left\{ \rho(x,y) e^{-j\gamma b \tau(x^2+y^2)} \right\} e^{-j(k_x x+k_y y)}dxdy ...(1),$$
where
$$$\rho(x,y)$$$ represents the spin density distribution in the subject, $$$\gamma$$$
is the gyromagnetic ratio, and $$$b$$$ and $$$\tau$$$ are the coefficient and
impressing time, respectively, of the quadratic field gradient. The coefficient
of phase scrambling $$$\gamma b \tau$$$ is normalized as $$$\gamma b \tau=h
\gamma b \tau \prime$$$ (
$$$\gamma b \tau \prime=\pi/(N \Delta x^2) )$$$ (N: size of image,
$$$\Delta x$$$ : pixel size).
Let $$$F_u$$$, $$$\Phi$$$, $$$\Psi$$$ and $$$Q$$$ be a
under-sampling operator in Fourier space, measurement matrix, sparsifying
function and quadratic phase scrambling function in Eq.(1), then sparsified
image is described as,$$${\breve
\rho}= \Psi \rho $$$, $$$\rho $$$ can be
well recovered through nonlinear optimizations,
$$$s=F_u Q \rho=F_u Q \Psi^{-1}{\breve \rho} $$$, $$$s=
\Phi {\breve \rho}$$$, where $$$\Phi=F_u Q \Psi^{-1}.$$$
Phase
scrambling function Q play a in important role to diffuse and spread the
artifacts caused by under-sampling, therefore, it is not necessary to randomly
pick-up signal as is used in conventional compressed
sensing(CS). In the previous work, we supposed the case when phase on the image
was small and it could be estimated well by either an acquired image or a pre-scanned images and real-value
image constraint was used in the reconstruction procedure3. In this
paper, complex sparsifying function is used to meet the rapid spatial phase
changes. We utilized the multi-frame FREBAS transform3 as sparsifying
function that can remove the aliasing artifacts effectively using a large
number basis functions used for multi-frame decomposition
Results & Discussions
MR normal volunteer images were collected using a
Toshiba 1.5T MRI scanner. Flow-sensitive black blood$$$^{4}$$$ images were acquired in order to obtain images that
have locally strong phase distortions (TE/TR = 40/50 ms, 256x256 matrix, slice
thickness: 1.5 mm ). PSFT signals were calculated using the acquired images data
according to the Eq.(1) in the simulation experiments.
Figures 1(a) and (d) show the phase and
magnitude of fully scanned image. Initial image is very important to the fast
convergence of reconstruction. Fig.(b) shows the simple zero-filled
reconstructed image and (c) shows the image using linearly interpolated signal in
Fresnel signal domain1.
We started the reconstruction using the image (c). Two different intervals of
signal selection were mixed in our sampling strategy, since when only a single
interval is used, aliasing artifacts sometimes remain as pointed by red arrows
in Fig.1(e).
The combination of sampling every third
point and every eleventh point results in scanning 42% of the signal ( (85 + 23)
/256= 0.428).
Aliasing artifacts are fairly reduced as shown in Fig.(f).
Figure 2(a) shows the comparison of a PSNR
evaluation with PSFT-CS with random sampling as a function of h using 20 images.
Dashed line are the PSNRs for the case when image are supposed to be a
real-value function.
Figure 3(b) shows the PSNR as a function of
reduction factor of signal.
The proposed method has almost the same PSNR
as does PSFT-CS.
PSNR of PSFT-CS varies with the seed of the
random number used to select the phase-encoding direction.
Figure 3(a)-(c) show the magnitude images
for h = 0.4, 0.6, and 1.0, respectively and (d) show the image obtained by
PSFT-CS.
The best images obtained by the proposed
method were with almost h = 1.0, as shown in Fig. 2 and Fig.3(c).
Fig.4 shows the results using actual PSFT
signal (42%, h=1.0) acquired 0.02T prototype MRI. Comparative image to PSFT-CS
was obtained in proposed method.
Without a real-value constraint on the spin
density function, quadratic phase scrambling is the way to spread the error;
therefore, for phase-varied images, PSNR attains a maximum value at a higher
value of h. In a practical situation, a higher h value is preferable for an
image that has rather strong phase variation.
Conclusion
A new fast image reconstruction method for images with rapid phase changes using a
regularly undersampled signal is proposed and demonstrated. By combining two
different interval of signal selection, fairly good complex images could be
reconstructed.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported in part by Takahashi Industrial and Economic
Research Foundation. In addition, we would like to thank Dr. T. Kimura for
providing the MR images.References
1. Ito S, et al., ISMRM2015, Toronto,
Canada, 2459, 2015
2. Maudsley AA, J Mag Reson, 76,
pp.287-305, 1988
3. Ito S, et al., ISMRM2015, Toronto,
Canada, 3407, 2015
4. Kimura T et al., 15th ISMRM2007, Berlin, p.3015, 2007