Rong Guo1, Yicheng Chen2, Jinsong Ouyang3, Georges El Fakhri3, and Kui Ying1
1Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China, People's Republic of, 2University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States, 3Center for Advanced Radiological Sciences, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, United States
Synopsis
Joint
reconstruction of PET and MRI is aimed to improve both PET and MR image quality
using information from each other’s imaging modality. However, the aim cannot
be achieved without correcting the attenuation of PET. We proposed a method to correct attenuation during the process of
simultaneous PET and MRI images reconstruction. This method integrates PET, MRI and TOF
information.TARGET AUDIENCE
People who are interested in PET-MRI research
PURPOSE
Joint reconstruction
of PET and MRI is aimed to improve both PET and MR image quality using
information from each other’s imaging modality. However, the aim cannot be
achieved without correcting the attenuation of PET, which is one of the most
significant factors that affect image quality and quantitative accuracy. In our
work, we proposed a method to correct attenuation during the process of
simultaneous PET and MRI images reconstruction. This method integrates PET, MRI and TOF
information, which is named as Joint Reconstruction of Activity, Attenuation
and MRI (JRAAM). A 2-D simulation experiment was implemented to evaluate the
performance of the proposed method.
METHOD
Algorithm: Based on the work of Ehrhardt about PET-MRI joint
reconstruction (JR) [1], which reconstructs PET and MRI images at the same
time, we integrated the information of TOF and the idea of Maximum likelihood
activity and attenuation (MLAA) [2] into the joint reconstruction to correct
attenuation. Thus, in the proposed method, the joint objective function of PET (u) and MRI (v) is modified as:
$$J(u,v)=\sum_{it}(\sum_jC_{ijt}u_{j}-y_{it}\log_{}({\sum_j}C_{ijt}u_{j}))+\frac{1}{2\sigma^{2}}{\mid Bv-g\mid }^{2}+\alpha R(u,v)\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot (1)$$
Where
C, B and R represent PET
system matrix, MRI system matrix and prior knowledge, respectively. Moreover, y is sinogram counts in each LOR and g
is acquired MRI data. R is joint
total variation, which is defined as:$$R(u,v)=\int_{Ω}^{}({\mid \triangledown u \mid}^{2}+{\mid \triangledown u \mid}^{2}+\beta^{2})^{\frac{1}{2}} \cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot(2)$$
Where β is a smooth entry whose value needs adjusting.
To
minimize the objective function (Eq.1), a quasi-Newton method named L-BFGS-B
[3] is exploited. After L-BFGS-B iteration, the PET images and MRI
images are updated. Next step, the attenuation coefficient distribution is
updated through the maximum likelihood for transmission tomography (MLTR)
algorithm. Then those updated PET, MRI and attenuation data are applied to next
iteration cycle. The whole process is presented as Fig.1.
Simulation
experiment:
To evaluate the proposed method, a NCAT phantom was used with only one slice due
to the concern of computation time. Emission data from PET scanner was
simulated by GATE [4], in which a simulated Siemens Biograph mMR system was
constructed. The TOF information was obtained by simulation on MATLAB and MRI
images were acquired from a MRI simulation software MRILAB [5]. Then, the JRAAM
algorithm was implemented on MATLAB. The weights of PET and MRI entries determine
which one of these two images is dominated and affect the reconstructed image
quality. Therefore, the objective function was rewritten as: $$J(u,v)=\gamma_{1}(\sum_{it}(\sum_jC_{ijt}u_{j}-y_{it}\log_{}({\sum_j}C_{ijt}u_{j})))+\gamma_{2}(\frac{1}{2\sigma^{2}}{\mid Bv-g\mid }^{2})+\alpha R(u,v)\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot\cdot (3)$$
Where γ1 and
γ2 represent the weight of PET and MRI entry,
respectively. Finally, the reconstruction results were compared with MLEM and
MLAA.
RESULTS
Reconstructed
MLEM, MLAA and JRAAM images of the simulation phantom are shown in Fig.2. The variances in two uniform
regions of interest (ROI), which represent noise level, are calculated in Tab.1. Besides, the two line plots that
cross myocardium and tumor are presented in Fig.3 and Fig.4,
respectively. These results illustrate that JRAAM performs better in decreasing
noise and revealing myocardium and tumor compared with MLAA. However, JRAAM
indicates a little bit higher noise bias than the reference MLEM results where
no attenuation correction is introduced. The use of TOF in attenuation
correction might result in noise bias. However, incorporating MR information in
the joint reconstruction (JRAAM), the errors brought by TOF could be reduced.
CONCLUSION
We have proposed a new
method to correct attenuation in PET-MRI joint reconstruction and validated its
feasibility by the simulated phantom. In further study, JRAAM should be
extended to 3D phantom and even be applied in clinical data.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1] Matthias J Ehrhardt, etc. Joint reconstruction of PET-MRI by
exploiting structural similarity. Inverse Problems 31 (2015) 015001 (23pp)
[2]
R. Boellaard, etc. Accurate PET/MR Quantification
Using Time of Flight MLAA Image Reconstruction. Mol Imaging Biol (2014)
16:469-477
[3] Zhu C, etc. L-BFGS-B:
Fortran subroutines for large-scale bound-constrained optimization. ACM (TOMS),
1997, 23(4): 550-560.
[4] http://www.opengatecollaboration.org
[5]D.Kroon. http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/fileexchange/21451-multimodality-non-rigid-demon-algorithm-image-registration