Line profile measure as a stopping criterion in CG-SENSE Reconstruction
Taquwa Aslam1, Mahwish Khan1, Ali Raza Shahid1, and Hammad Omer1

1Electrical Engineering, COMSATS Institute of information technology, Islamabad, Pakistan

Synopsis

CG SENSE is an iterative algorithm used in PMRI for MR image reconstruction from under-sampled data. One major limitation of CG-SENSE is the appropriate choice of the number of iterations required for good reconstruction results.This paper proposes the use of a correlation measure between the line profiles of the reconstructed images in the current and the previous iteration, as a stopping criterion for the CG-SENSE algorithm. Results of the proposed method are compared with the Bregman distance stopping criterion. The results show that the use of line profile correlation measure acts as an effective stopping criterion in CG-SENSE.

Purpose

CG-SENSE [1] is an iterative algorithm used in PMRI for MR image reconstruction from under-sampled data. One major limitation of CG-SENSE is the appropriate choice of the number of iterations required for good reconstruction results, fewer iterations may result in aliasing artifacts and too many iterations result in an increased noise level. This paper proposes the use of a correlation measure between the line profiles of the reconstructed images in the current and the previous iterations, as a stopping criterion for the CG-SENSE algorithm.

Method

Human cardiac data (in radial k-space) is acquired using 3 Tesla Skyra Siemens scanner at Case Western Reserve University, USA with 30 channel cardiac coils and 80 measurement frames (dimension 256×144×30×80) at TR=2.94ms with real-time, free-breathing and no ECG gating. The acquired data is under-sampled for different acceleration factors retrospectively. The under-sampled radial data is fed into CG-SENSE algorithm. A correlation [3] of the line-profile (the central line of the reconstructed image) between the current and the previous iteration is computed. An ideal value of this correlation (i.e 1) indicates that the iterations should stop because the most recent iteration has not improved the solution image. This paper uses a correlation value of 0.9950 as a stopping criterion. The reconstruction results of the proposed method are compared with the Bregman distance [2] stopping criterion, where Bregman distance between the current and the previous iterations was used as a stopping criterion.

Results an Discussion

Figure 1 shows the reconstructed cardiac images obtained using the line profile stopping criterion (proposed method). Figure 2 shows the reconstructed cardiac images at different acceleration factors (AF) using Bregman distance stopping criterion. Figure 3-a compares AP for both the stopping criteria and it shows that at AF= 4 the AP for Bregman distance method and line profile method is comparable whereas at higher acceleration factors (i.e. 8 and 12) line profile stopping criterion(proposed method) shows better results. Figure 3-b compares peak-signal-to- noise ratio for both the methods. The results show that the proposed method provides good PSNR at all acceleration factors.

Conclusion

The line profile correlation measure acts as an effective stopping criterion in CG-SENSE

Acknowledgements

Department of Electrical Engineering, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan

References

[1] Nicole Seiberlich, Non-Cartesian Parallel Imaging Reconstruction, Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Volume 40, Issue 5, pages 1022–1040, November 2014.

[2] Regularized Sensitivity Encoding (SENSE) Reconstruction Using Bregman Iterations Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 61:145–152 (2009) Bo Liu,1,2 Kevin King,2 Michael Steckner,3 Jun Xie,4 Jinhua Sheng,1 and Leslie Ying1*

[3] A basic course in statistics, 5th edition by Geoffrey M.Clarke, Dennis Cooke , October 2004. ISBN:978-0-470-97387-5

Figures

Reconstructed images with line-profile correlation stopping criterion in CG-SENSE

Reconstructed images with Bregman distance stopping criterion in CG-SENSE

Comparison of Artifact Power of Correlation method and Bregman distance method

Comparison of PSNR of Correlation method and Bregman distance method



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
1771