Ileana Hancu1 and Christopher Hardy1
1GE Global Research Center, Niskayuna, NY, United States
Synopsis
Direct detection of
neuronal activity through MRI is an active research area. Typical MRI-based
approaches for direct detection of neuronal currents use echo-planar imaging,
which offers wide spatial coverage at low temporal resolution (>100ms). In
this work, we explore a significantly different paradigm, in which we give up
wide spatial coverage, gaining the capability of sampling signals at much
higher rates. Our simulation results indicate that the ability to compare
entire time curves sampled at a high temporal rate leads to an increase in the sensitivity
of detecting neuronal currents by a factor of at least 10.Purpose
Direct detection of neuronal
activity through MRI is an active area of research [1]. It generally relies on
the fact that ionic currents associated with synaptic activity result in small
magnetic-field changes in the active brain area. These fields alter the
precession frequency of the nuclear spins, leading to magnitude or phase changes.
Typical MRI-based approaches for direct detection of neuronal currents use
echo-planar imaging (EPI), which offers wide spatial coverage at low temporal
resolution (>100ms). While the low spectral bandwidth of the acquired signal
(<10Hz) is appropriate for detecting the delta, theta and perhaps alpha
brain waves, it is not useful for detecting either the beta/gamma waves, or
evoked potentials. Moreover, confounders of neuronal activation, such as
vibrations caused by cold-head pumps, and subject cardiac- and respiratory-related
motion, also have their signatures in the 0-3Hz domain [2]. These effects may increase
the minimum detectable field changes to levels higher than could be caused by
neuronal excitation.
In this work, we explore a
significantly different paradigm, in which we give up wide spatial coverage, gaining
the capability of sampling signals at rates significantly higher than 10Hz. Our
simulation results indicate that the ability to compare entire time curves
sampled at a high temporal rate (as opposed to single TE’s on those curves)
leads to an increase in the sensitivity of detecting the effects of neuronal
currents by a factor of at least 10.
Methods
Experiments were performed on a 3T, MR750 GE
scanner, using 8/32 channel head coils. The water signal from a 64mm3
voxel in a 1g/l CuSO4-doped agarose gel phantom was sampled using a
spectroscopic PRESS acquisition (Figure 1). 512 free induction decays (FID’s), sampled
every 200ms, were collected using TR=1second (8.33min
total acquisition time). Alternate FIDs were then artificially endowed with an
additional phase change, corresponding to a small magnetic field step-function
change (Figure 2). This could be a simulation of
signal changes in the visual cortex, with the stimulus synchronized with the
scanner’s every second acquisition. The average phase @TE=40ms and the average
phase slope in the two signal pools (“excitation” ON and OFF) were then
statistically compared for various excitation (ΔB
0)
levels. This TE is typical for in vivo experiments [3], chosen as a compromise
between maximizing contrast and minimizing SNR loss due to T2 decay.
The minimum detectable ΔB
0 change was also assessed both for a single TE
(the only option available for EPI imaging), and using the phase slope (if
sampling the signal spectroscopically).
Results and discussion
Figure 3 presents an example of two FID phase signals,
one acquired “on resonance” (blue dots), and one endowed with an additional
neuronal current-induced phase offset of ΔB
0=0.2Hz (green dots); the off-resonance was
exaggerated here for better visualization purposes. The time-dependent phase evolution
is due to slight off-resonance behavior (<1Hz)—even in the voxel experimentally
placed on resonance. The evolution under an additional off-resonance field
causes a slope change. Note that while signal comparison at one given TE is
noisy and requires signal averaging, slope comparison results in an immediate
determination (in this case) of the difference between the two signals. Figure
4 presents a summary of our simulation results. Note that using our 256 signals
per condition and the 32-channel coil, field changes as small as 0.001Hz (25
pT) can be detected if comparing phase slope; this is 20-fold higher than if using
single TE acquisitions. This improvement reduces to a factor of 10, with the 8-channel
coil. The higher detection capability of the 32-channel coil is expected, given
the SNR increase/ phase-variability decrease achievable in this case. Last, but
not least, note that while our approach requires trading off brain coverage for
sensitivity increases, at least 3 voxels (suggested by standard fMRI or
tractography, eg), can be independently quarried simultaneously. Any three independently
chosen points define a plane, which can be excited by the first 90-degree pulse
(Figure 1). Replacing the 2nd and 3rd refocusing pulses
with multi-band pulses can result in simultaneous sampling of data from these three
regions (Figure 5). Signal separation using Hadamard encoding or SENSE
reconstruction can then be achieved.
Conclusions
A simulation study is presented that suggests
that trading off spatial coverage for temporal resolution can result in
sensitivity increases of a factor of 20 to detect magnetic field changes caused
by neuronal currents. Validation of these results in vivo is pending.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1] Bodurka et
al, Magn Reson Med 2002;47:1052-1058.
[2] G. Hagberg et al, NeuroImage, 2012, 59:3748-3761
[3] Konn et al, Magn Reson Imaging, 2004, 22:1413-1427.