Guoxiang Liu1,2, Takashi Ueguchi1,2, Ikuhiro Kida1,2, Ken-ichi Okada1,2, and Yasushi Kobayashi1,2
1National Institute of Information and Communications Technology, Suita-shi,Osaka, Japan, 2Osaka University, Suita-shi, Osaka, Japan
Synopsis
In
this work, we implemented tDCS experiments on a monkey brain and a phantom at a 7T human
MRI scanner to investigate
the possibility to measure current flow during tDCS. Our results showed that
imaging distortions caused by current in lead wires but not in brain is a
possible source of BOLD-like MRI signal changes.Purpose
In
recent years, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is often used in functional
magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies as a noninvasive brain stimulation
technique, because tDCS has been shown to alter cortical excitability and
activity via weak direct currents [1]. However, Antal et al. [2] have reported that
there is potential confounding interference from tDCS-induced current flow in
fMRI studies. They also mentioned that such kind of signal change, in turn, attracts
the possibility to measure current flow in the brain
during stimulation. In this work, we implemented tDCS experiments
on a monkey brain and a phantom on a 7T human MRI scanner using a similar
paradigm in ref. [2] to investigate the possibility of current flow measurement
in the brain during tDCS. Our results showed that imaging distortion caused by current
flow in lead wires but not in the brain is a possible source of BOLD (blood
oxygenation level-dependent)-like MRI signal changes.
Methods
We performed tDCS
experiments with a Japanese monkey (Macacca
fusucata, female, 7kg) and a phantom on a 7T whole-body scanner (Siemens Healthcare,
Erlangen, Germany) using a 32-channel phased array head coil (Nova Medical, MA,
USA). In order to suppress head motion, the monkey was anesthetized using ketamine (10mg/kg) prior to the image acquisition. The
monkey was placed in supine position with its head and neck fixed to the coil
using a thermoplastic immobilizer. Direct current with 10 mA intensity was generated
by an electrical simulator (Nihon Koden, Tokyo, Japan) outside the magnet room.
Two pair of rounded electrodes (1 cm in diameter) were connected to the simulator via cable running
through a radio frequency filter tube in the cabin wall. Each pair of
electrodes were placed over the left/right SM1 and over their contralateral
orbits. The lead wires of one pair of electrodes were placed along the longitudinal
direction (z direction in x-y-z coordinate system), and the other pair was placed
on the surface of the monkey’s head in x-y plane.
Gradient-echo echo-planar imaging (EPI) sequence was used to obtain oblique-axial
fMRI data at nominal spatial resolution of 1.5×1.5×1.5 mm
3. Acquisition
parameters were as follows: TR = 1000 ms, TE = 20 ms, flip angle = 41°, GRAPPA =
2. Similar tDCS validation experiment was performed using a brain
tissue-mimicking phantom made of carrageenan gel. The stimulation paradigm was
implemented as a block design with stimulation ON and OFF for blocks of 10 s
each, and repeated 20 times. Stimulation-induced fluctuation in local magnetic
field was detected as phase oscillation in gradient echo images (TR/TE = 300/20
ms) acquired at the same slice position. For comparison with ref. [2],
“BrainVoyagerQX” (Version 2.8.4.2645, Brain Innovation, Maastricht, The
Netherlands) was used to analyze EPI time series without any preprocessing.
Generalized linear model (GLM) analysis was applied for each experiment with
stimulation ON/OFF as a binary regression variable.
Results and Discussion
Under the stimulation through the lead wires placed in
the x-y plane, which was also used in ref. [2], BOLD-like MRI signal change was
detected at the superficial areas (Fig. 1, top row). Similar pseudo-activation areas
with inverted signal polarity were found when reversing the direction of the current
flow. In contrast, stimulation through the wires placed in the z direction
presented almost no pseudo-activation areas (Fig. 1, bottom row). These results
suggest that EPI is insensitive to the current flow in the brain caused by
tDCS, but rather sensitive to the magnetic field change caused by the current in
lead wires. The results from the phantom experiment support this explanation. In
the gradient echo scans, the phase shift caused by current-induced local
magnetic field change can be calculated by comparing the data with and without
tDCS (Fig. 2, top row). This kind of phase shift was observed when stimulation
was given through the x-y plane, but was not detected under stimulation through
the z direction. There was another evidence that the polarity of stimulation-induced
MRI signal change in EPI time series of the phantom was highly dependent on the
“polarity” of phase encoding direction (i.e., “AP” and “PA”; Fig. 2, bottom row).
In conclusion, MRI signal change observed during tDCS is more likely due to EPI
distortion stemming from current flow in lead wires.
Acknowledgements
This study was supported in part by Japan Society for the Promotion of
Science (JSPS) Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research, "KAKENHI" (No.
26282223 and No. 26350471).References
[1] Antal,
A., Polania, R., Schmidt-Samoa, C., Dechent, P., Paulus, W., 2011b.
Transcranial direct current stimulation over the primary motor cortex during
fMRI. Neuroimage 55, 590–596.
[2] Antal,
A., Bikson, M., Datta, A., Lafon, B., Dechent, P., Parra, L. C., et al. (2014).
Imaging artifacts induced by electrical stimulation during conventional fMRI of
the brain. Neuroimage 85(Pt. 3), 1040–1047.