Jaakko Paasonen1, Raimo A Salo1, Joanna K Huttunen1, and Olli Gröhn1
1Department of Neurobiology, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Finland
Synopsis
Anesthesia is a major confounding
factor in fMRI studies, because it directly affects brain function. As recent
evidence suggests that functional connectivity (FC) changes with anesthetic
depth, we investigated whether FC could be used to measure anesthetic depth in
preclinical fMRI studies and subsequently predict fMRI responses under five
anesthetics. The FC was able to predict the magnitude of fMRI responses under
different anesthetics. The FC also changed during 1-h interval with injectable
anesthetics. Therefore, we conclude that FC analysis of baseline fMRI data can
provide simple way to control one of the key confounding factors in preclinical
fMRI studies.Purpose
Preclinical functional magnetic
resonance imaging (fMRI) is a powerful brain research tool, as it can be used
in more controlled and invasive experiments compared to human studies. In most
animal fMRI study settings, however, anesthesia is a major confounding factor,
because the anesthesia directly affects brain function and responsiveness to
stimuli.
1 Recent evidence suggests that parameters obtained with
resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI) are coupled with anesthetic depth.
2
Therefore, we investigated whether rs-fMRI parameters, such as functional
connectivity (FC), also have a relation to blood oxygen level dependent (BOLD)
responses to different stimuli. A simple rs-fMRI protocol was implemented in a
pharmacologic fMRI (phMRI) study evaluating brain hemodynamic responsiveness
and anesthetic state under five anesthetics. The temporal change in FC was also
evaluated at 1-h interval during the experiments.
Methods
The animal procedures were approved
by the National Animal Experiment Board. Male Wistar rats (347±36 g) were used
in the fMRI experiments with five anesthetics: α-chloralose (n=8, 60 mg/kg + 30 mg/kg/h
i.v.), isoflurane (n=8, 1.3%), medetomidine (n=7, 0.1 mg/kg/h i.v.),
thiobutabarbital (n=10, 140 mg/kg i.p.), and urethane (n=8, 1.25 g/kg i.p.). All
rats were anesthetized with isoflurane during femoral artery and vein
cannulation. A tracheal tube was inserted for ventilation. The fMRI data were
acquired with 7T Bruker Pharmascan with single-shot spin-echo echo planar
imaging (TR 2 s, TE 45 ms, FOV 2.5x2.5 cm2, 64x64 matrix, and 9x1.5 mm
slices). The fMRI session included two rs-fMRI acquisitions (300 volumes) with
1-h interval and an acute nicotine (88 µg/kg i.v.) challenge phMRI scan (700 volumes)
between rs-fMRI measurements. Additionally, forepaw stimulation was performed
for two TBB-anesthetized rats. Arterial blood samples were obtained and
analyzed twice during imaging. The MRI data were converted to NIfTI (http://aedes.uef.fi),
slice-timing corrected, motion-corrected, spatially smoothed, and co-registered
using SPM8 (www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm) and Matlab (Version 2011a, The Mathworks
Inc., Natick, MA, USA). The analyses were performed using in-house Matlab code,
Aedes, and SPM8.
Results
Physiologic parameters were in
normal range. The highest nicotine-induced BOLD responses were observed in the urethane
group. Rats under medetomidine and isoflurane anesthesia also showed robust
responses, while under α-chloralose anesthesia BOLD responses evoked by
nicotine were weak. Within the thiobutabarbital group we observed two different
response patterns (Figure 1), and correspondingly the animals were stratified
into two subgroups: Subgroup 1 (TBB-SG1) and Subgroup 2 (TBB-SG2). The coherence
analysis of the resting-state acquisitions revealed similar grouping patterns
among the thiobutabarbital rats (Figure 2). Spearman’s rank correlation
coefficients (ρ) between baseline FC and nicotine-induced BOLD revealed
significant positive correlations in the α-chloralose, isoflurane, medetomidine,
and thiobutabarbital groups (Table 1). The temporal changes in global FC are
shown in Figure 3. In α-chloralose, TBB-SG2, and urethane groups the FC values
significantly increased during the 1-h observation period. The permanence of
the coupling between FC and hemodynamic responsiveness was investigated with somatosensory
stimulation experiments (Figure 4). Rat with initially weak coherence values
and negative nicotine response also had a weak BOLD response to forepaw
stimulation. However, at 2
nd time point, the coherence values were increased
and a robust BOLD response to forepaw stimulation was detected.
Discussion
The results show that FC measured
during baseline period was able to predict the magnitude of BOLD response to
nicotine stimulation, especially under thiobutabarbital anesthesia. More
importantly, the resting-state data was highly valuable during the data
interpretation. For example, the measured standard physiologic parameters were
not able to distinguish the subjects with different responsiveness to nicotine.
Accurate measurement of the anesthetic depth would require more direct methods,
such as electrophysiologic recordings, which are technically demanding in the magnet
bore.
In all groups in which a significant
temporal change in FC was observed, the anesthetic was administered as a bolus.
With the continuously administered anesthetics, isoflurane and medetomidine,
significant differences were not detected between the two time points. This
observation might suggest that FC dynamically changes according to the
pharmacodynamics of the anesthetic, and an rs-fMRI protocol is able to detect
these changes.
Conclusion
Our findings indicate that rs-fMRI
is capable of evaluating brain hemodynamic responsiveness to pharmacological
and sensory stimulation and temporal progression of anesthesia. Therefore, FC
analysis of baseline data is a highly valuable and readily implementable tool
for controlling preclinical fMRI experiments.
Acknowledgements
We thank Maarit Pulkkinen for animal preparations.References
1. Lukasik VM and Gillies RJ. 2003.
Animal anaesthesia for in vivo magnetic resonance. NMR in Biomedicine
16(8):459-467.
2. Nallasamy N and Tsao DY. 2011.
Functional connectivity in the brain: Effects of anesthesia. The Neuroscientist:
A Review Journal Bringing Neurobiology, Neurology and Psychiatry 17(1):94-106.