R. Allen Waggoner1, Topi Tanskanen1, Keiji Tanaka1, and Kang Cheng1,2
1Laboratory for Cognitive Brain Mapping, RIKEN - Brain Science Institute, Wako-shi, Japan, 2fMRI Support Unit, RIKEN - Brain Science Institute, Wako-shi, Japan
Synopsis
The potential benefits of multi-band EPI for
event-related fMRI studies has received little attention. In this study, we explore the impact of the
reduced repetition times permitted by modest levels of slice acceleration on
the extent of activation in an event-related study. We also explore the use of this denser
sampling to investigate the differences in hemodynamic response to variations
in stimuli and differences in the hemodynamic response across brain regions.Purpose
Multi-band
EPI has primarily been applied to DTI and resting-state fMRI and there are an
increasing number of examples of task-based fMRI studies. The benefit of
multi-band EPI for task-based fMRI in general has been explored
1,
however the specific benefits of multi-band EPI for event-related(EvR)
paradigms have not been considered. With multi-band EPI, it should be possible to
shorten the Tr to the point that the BOLD response of each event can be
adequately sampled, thus significantly improving the efficiency of EvR fMRI
studies. In addition densely sampled EvR
responses should enhance the exploration of variations in the hemodynamic response,
both as a function of stimulus variation and brain region. Here we have used two visual paradigms to
explore the benefits of multi-band EPI for EvR fMRI.
Methods
To
assess the benefit of decreased Tr for EvR fMRI a series of experiments were
preformed on 4 subjects (35±4 yrs. old) using combinations of in-plane (r) and
slice (s) acceleration. Five Trs were used 3.252s (r1s1), 2.0s (r2s1),
1.626s (r1s2), 1.0s (r2s2), and 0.813s (r1s4).
For r1s4 FA was 35°, which was below the Ernst angle (56°), due to peak
power limitations of the RF amplifier.
For all other accelerations the FA was set to the Ernst angle. For all
combinations of acceleration, the reconstructed matrix size was 64x64x40 with
3mm isotropic resolution. These data
were acquired using a 16-channel receive array (Nova Medical)
covering the entire brain. The stimulus
paradigm used for each run was 14s rest followed by 19 repetitions of an 8Hz
flickering checkerboard (1s on – 14s off).
An
additional study was performed on one subject (36 yrs. old), using a previously
published contrast adaptation paradigm2. By using a multi-band factor of 4 and a
receive array(Life Services LLC) targeting the visual cortex (16-channels over the posterior half
of the brain) the
temporal resolution was improved from 800ms to 500ms while increasing spatial coverage from
8 to 24 slices, covering the entire visual cortex with a 3mm isotropic spatial
resolution. The stimulus consisted of 4 checkerboard
circles, each 8° in diameter, one placed in each visual quadrant, 7° from the
fixation point. Following a 60s period
of adaptation to the baseline contrast (12.5% or 25%), the contrast would randomly
increase or decrease by one or two octaves every 11~15s, for 3s, with a total
run time of 600s. There were two runs
for each baseline contrast, for a total of four runs.
Slice
separation was performed using the slice GRAPPA algorithm3 and
in-plane accelerations were reconstructed with GRAPPA4. All experiments were conducted on an Agilent
4T MRI system. The functional data was analyzed with mrTools5. For the Tr
comparison study, a GLM design matrix consisting of the stimulus paradigm
convolved with a double Gamma function and its temporal derivative was used. For the contrast adaptation study, a Finite
Impulse Response6 (FIR) analysis was used.
Results & Discussion
Figure 1 shows example
functional maps at each acceleration factor for one subject. Figure 2 shows the average number of
activated voxels over the entire visual cortex at each Tr and acceleration.
Both figures show that for Tr values of 2s or more (slice acceleration factor of
1) the extend of activation is substantially reduced. At these low sampling rates the peak of the
BOLD response could be missed by as much as 1.0~1.6s and only 2~3 points are
sampled during each response, leading to reduced contrast to noise and statistical
power. The activation extent at
the shortest Tr(0.813s, r1s4) isomewhat below those for Tr = 1.0 &
1.6s, in most subjects. This is likely due to the less than optimal flip
angle. This limitation can be resolved
by implementing VERSE3 or parallel transmit methods7.
Figure 3, shows responses to the
contrast change plotted on the retinotopic map of the subject's right hemisphere.
Figure 4, shows FIR determined hemodynamic responses to contrast changes
in V1 and hV4. In Figure 4, V1
responses to decrements in contrast are negative as previously reported2. The dense sampling of the BOLD response
clearly shows that negative responses in V1 peak earlier
(1.4s) than the positive responses.
In hV4, the BOLD responses to all contrast changes are positive, as
previously reported2.
Conclusions
The
higher temporal resolution afforded by multi-band EPI allows more efficient
sampling of the BOLD response in EvR studies which can lead to dramatically
enhanced statistical power and improved characterization of the hemodynamic
response, even when using only modest levels of slice acceleration, such as
those employed in this study.
Acknowledgements
This work was partially funded by a grant from the Brain/MINDS project.References
1. Chen L, Vu A T, Xu J, et al. Evaluation of highly accelerated simultaneous multi-slice EPI for fMRI. NeuroImage 2015; 104:452-459.
2. Gardner J L, Sun P, Waggoner R A, et al. Contrast adaptation and representation in early visual cortex. Neuron 2015; 47:607-620.
3. Setsompop K, Gagoski B A, Polimeni, J R, et al. Blipped-controlled aliasing in parallel imaging for simultaneous multislice echo planar imaging with reduced g-factor penalty. Magn. Res. Med. 2012; 67:1210-1224.
4. Griswold M A, Jakob P M, Heidemann R M, et al. Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA). Magn. Res. Med. 2002; 47:1202-1210.
5. http://gru.stanford.edu/doku.php/
6. Glover G H, Deconvolution of impulse response in event-related BOLD
fMRI. NeuroImage 1999; 9:416-429.
7.
Ugurbil K, Xu J, Auerbach E J, et al. Pushing spatial and temporal
resolution for functional and diffusion MRI in the Human Connectome Project. NeuroImage
2013; 80:80-104.