Michael J. Tobia1, Abdou Thiam1, Prasanna Karunanayaka2, and Qing X. Yang1
1Radiology, Penn State Hershey, Hershey, PA, United States, 2Radiology, Penn State Hershey, Heshey, PA, United States
Synopsis
The olfactory system is unique from other sensory systems in that it is primarily ipsilateral from the periphery to the central nervous system. Using fMRI and a simple olfactory stimulus detection paradigm, we show a right hemispheric bias for sensory activation stemming from unilateral stimulation to either nostril. This suggests the presence of a contralateral functional organization of the olfactory system.Introduction
The
afferent connectivity to the primary olfactory cortex (POC) from the olfactory
bulb is ipsilateral in humans and other species [1]. The POC itself is not a unitary structure,
but rather a collection of brain regions including the piriform cortex and
amygdala, insula, and orbitofrontal cortex [1].
Interhemispheric connections exist via the anterior commissure [1] and
other downstream structures, suggesting that direct olfactory sensory
processing is unilateral, while some secondary olfactory processing occurs
bilaterally. In addition, POC activity is increased by olfactory motor behavior
(i.e., sniffing) compared to normal breathing [2], even in the absence of an
odorant. In this study we administered
monorhinal (only one nostril) and dirhinal (both nostrils) olfactory stimulation
to determine whether sensory receptor laterality determines lateralization of
neural activity in regions of the POC, and whether this is altered by sniffing
(3). We expected lateralized stimulation
to produce lateralized activation, and that sniffing would enhance activation
bilaterally.
Method
Twenty
normosmic (N=20) subjects (males/females) completed an olfactory fMRI paradigm
with four conditions: 1) dirhinal PEA; 2) dirhinal air; 3) monorhinal PEA left;
and 4) monorihinal PEA right. Each condition
was presented 6 times with an inter-trial interval of 24 seconds to prevent
habituation. There were 6 trials of each
type for a total of 24 trials. The
odorant was PEA (i.e., the smell of a rose).
There was a constant flow rate of fresh air/odorants (8L/min). The task was performed passively; no response
was required. Each subject performed the
task twice, with instructions to either ‘Sniff’ when cued, or ‘No sniff,
breathe normally.’
Results
Data
were analyzed with a boxcar convolved with a hemodynamic response function
within the GLM in SPM8, and indicate a mix of expected and unexpected results
that are in agreement across the two ‘Sniff’ and ‘No sniff’ conditions. For the
“Sniff” paradigm, monorhinal and dirhinal stimulation elicited activation in
the POC (Figure 2), as in the ‘No sniff’ condition (Figure 3). Our results for the ‘Sniff’ condition (Figure
2) show that stimulation to the right nostril activated only the right piriform
cortex unilaterally, while left stimulation activated the piriform cortex bilaterally, similar to dirhinal
stimulation. For the “No sniff”
paradigm, results replicated the “Sniff” condition: monorhinal and dirhinal
stimulation elicited activation in the POC (Figure 3). Stimulation to the right nostril activated only
the right piriform cortex unilaterally, while left stimulation activated the
piriform cortex bilaterally, again similar
to dirhinal stimulation. Sniffing had no effect on bilateral activation in
either of the unilateral stimulations.
Discussion
Our
results show mixed effects concerning laterality of stimulation and activation.
When olfactory stimulation is unilateral, the right POC responds more
vigorously than the left POC, regardless of the nostril that was stimulated. When
olfactory stimulation is bilateral, or when there is no odor present, POC
activation is bilateral. Our findings
are in line with previous
studies that suggest asymmetry in both the POC and orbitofrontal cortex
depending on olfactory task demands[4].
Conclusion
The simple olfactory fMRI paradigms provided a
straight forward method to obtain information about nostril specific processing
in the brain.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Shipley
& Ennis (1996). Functional organization of olfactory system. Journal of
Neurobiology, 30:123-76.
2. Sobel et al
(1998). Sniffing and smelling: separate subsystems in the human olfactory
cortex. Nature, 392:282-6.
3. Porter et al
(2005). Brain Mechanisms for Extracting Spatial Information from Smell. Neuron,
47:581-592.
4. Royet & Plailly
(2004). Lateralization of olfactory processes. Chem Senses, 29: 731–745.