Luis Manuel Colon-Perez1 and Marcelo Febo1
1Psychiatry, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, United States
Synopsis
Drug abuse has detrimental effects
on the brain function, which lead to drug use disorders. In vivo non-invasive biomarkers are needed to determine the neurobiological
outcomes of addictive drugs on the brain. Functional MRI and graph theory offer
an analytical approach to address brain network changes associated with
psychiatric disorders. In the present study we determined the effects of two
addictive psychostimulant drugs. Comparison between
saline and drug administered shows a reduction in the connectivity at 1 hr but
not at 24 hrs. Acute
administration of the two psychostimulants studied produce only transient
effects lasting at least 1 hr.Introduction
Functional MRI (fMRI) and graph
theory offer an objective and analytical approach to address brain network
changes associated with psychiatric disorders
1; however its use in animal studies have been
limited in psychiatric disorders like drug use disorders. Drug abuse has
detrimental effects on the brain function, at short and long time scales, which
lead to drug use disorders. In vivo
non-invasive biomarkers are needed to determine the neurobiological outcomes of
addictive drugs on the brain
2. In the present study we determined the effects of two addictive
psychostimulant drugs, 3,4-methylenedioxypyrovalerone (MDPV) and cocaine, using
various graph measures of network connectivity in rodents. MDPV is a designer
cathinone drug that is present in formulation of street drugs known as ‘bath
salts’
3. In this study we investigate the short-term
effect of a single dose of the psychostimulant drugs at 1 and 24 hrs.
Methods
Two resting state fMRI
datasets were collected in 4.7T Agilent system at 1 and 24 hrs after i.p. administration
of 1.0 mg kg
-1 of MDPV (n
1hour = 8, n
24hour =
8), cocaine of 15 mg kg
-1 (n
1hour = 8, n
24hour
= 6), and a control group administered with saline (n
1hour = 7, n
24hour
= 6) using a 2-shot spin echo EPI sequence. The acquisition parameters were:
TR/TE = 1000/45 ms, and 210 repetitions for a total acquisition time of ~7.5
mins. Imaging was conducted while rats were under 0.5% isofluorane/0.02 mg kg
-1
dexmedetomidine anesthesia (70%N
2/30%O
2 at 0.1L/min). Images
were processed for seed-based functional connectivity analysis using a
segmented atlas of the rat brain using FSL
4 and AFNI for 150
anatomical regions. Networks were generated with equal graph densities (15% of
all possible connections). To
determine the network differences of MDPV and cocaine induced alterations in
connectivity we compared network relevant measures (i.e. node
strength, path length, and clustering coefficient) to controls. Finally, the brain
networks were visualized using BrainNet
5.
Results
Comparison between saline and drug administered shows
a reduction in the connectivity at 1 hr however at 24 hrs is no longer observed
(Figure 1). The clustering coefficient, an indicator of network integration,
was reduced greatly at 1 hr for both drug groups compared to saline, but not at
24 hr. The path length also showed the same reduction at 1 hr and not at 24
hrs. It is interesting to note that saline injections at the 1hr time point was
a major driver of heightened connectivity, which waned 24 hrs after saline
injection. This experience immediately prior to imaging influence connectivity,
like overall strength and small-world topology. Moreover, while drug
administered showed a lower connectivity at 1 hr post-treatment, it showed an
increased connectivity at 24 hrs (compared to saline groups for their
respective time points). We observed that all groups achieved a uniform small-worldness
level at 24 hrs. To sum, while saline administration to produce an increase in
connectivity, cocaine and MDPV reduce these brain functional connectivity
features. These effects are transient and a uniform topology between groups can
be observed 24 hrs after initial saline and drug treatments.
Conclusion
These results suggest that
the brain maintain efficient information transmission through short path
lengths, under the effects of drugs, during the first hour after
administration; however, their integration is affected by reducing the
clustering of local communities. This suggests a mechanism of disruption of
local information processing in the brain. However, after 24 hrs after
administration brain activity is restored. After the first hr there is a higher
level of connectivity in saline compared to 24 hours after saline injection,
which seems to imply there is a response during the handling of the rats and
administration of the drug that can affect resting state connectivity (even
under anesthesia). The latter results suggest a novel experience-associated
modulation of resting-state networks that deserves further investigation. It
also suggest acclimatization to handling is a confounding variable that needs
to be accounted for in future experiments. Finally, under acute treatment
conditions, the two psychostimulants studied here produce only transient
effects lasting at least 1 hr. It remains to be determined whether longer
lasting network changes can be observed following more realistic and chronic
drug intake paradigms.
Acknowledgements
We thank the Advanced Magnetic
Resonance Imaging and Spectroscopy (AMRIS) facility for their support (NSF
Cooperative Agreement No. DMR-1157490 and the State of Florida) and NIH grants
DA019946 and DA038009. The authors also would like to thank Dr. Craig F. Ferris
and Dr. Praveen Kulkarni for their support with the segmented atlas of the rat
brain. There are no conflicts of interest to declare.References
1. Sporns, O. Structure and function of complex brain
networks. Dialogues Clin Neurosci 15, 247-262 (2013).
2. Li, S. J. et al. Cocaine administration decreases functional connectivity in
human primary visual and motor cortex as detected by functional MRI. Magn Reson Med 43, 45-51 (2000).
3. Prosser, J. M. & Nelson, L. S. The
toxicology of bath salts: a review of synthetic cathinones. J Med Toxicol 8, 33-42, doi:10.1007/s13181-011-0193-z (2012).
4. Jenkinson, M., Beckmann, C. F.,
Behrens, T. E., Woolrich, M. W. & Smith, S. M. Fsl. Neuroimage 62, 782-790,
doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.09.015 (2012).
5. Xia, M., Wang, J. & He, Y.
BrainNet Viewer: a network visualization tool for human brain connectomics. PLoS One 8, e68910, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0068910 (2013).