Effect of Brain Tumours on the Default Mode Network
Sukhmanjit Ghumman1, David Fortin1, Stephen Cunnane1, and Kevin Whittingstall1

1Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke (CHUS), Sherbrooke, QC, Canada

Synopsis

The effect of various pathologies on the default mode network (DMN) have been investigated in recent years with some encouraging results. These studies have found that some diseases of the nervous system, such as brain tumours, can have an effect on DMN connectivity. The goal of this novel research was to investigate whether tumours of certain areas of the brain or of certain histological type had disproportionately large effects on the DMN. We believe that DMN connectivity could be developed into a prognostic score in the future which might help clinicians in making key treatment decisions for brain cancer patients.

Introduction

The default mode network is a task negative functional network in the brain. Variations in the strength of this network have been associated to many neurological diseases, such as dementias, schizophrenia and autism [1], though few studies have attempted to elucidate the effect of brain tumours on the default mode network. The few studies that have been conducted have found that tumours cause a decrease in DMN connectivity, but they have not attempted to differentiate whether certain tumour types have a larger effect on the DMN [2-4]. The goal of this study was to investigate the effect of tumour histological type and location on its effect on the default mode network.

Materials and methods

Data acquisition

73 patients afflicted with brain tumours and 23 healthy aging patients were recruited for this study. For each patient, T1 MPRAGE anatomical scans (1mm isotropic) and resting state fMRI scans (EPI sequence, resolution of 3.75x3.75x3 mm with TR/TE of 3.864/0.04 s) were taken with a Siemens 1.5 T MR scanner. Diagnosis of the tumour afflicted patients was made by histology.

Pre-processing

fMRI data was pre-processed in accordance to current norms for resting-state connectivity studies [5].Pre-processing was conducted with the AFNI software package [6]. Briefly, functional data was despiked, motion corrected, coregistered to the high resolution skull stripped anatomical scan and blurred with a 4mm FWHM Gaussian kernel. Both functional and anatomical data was then warped to an MNI template to conduct multi-subject statistical testing.

Connectivity analysis

Functional connectivity was probed with two commonly used modalities: seed-based analysis (SBA) and independent component analysis (ICA). Both modalities were used in order to benefit from the advantages associated to each. For SBA, 5mm radius seeds were placed at 6 locations commonly known as being DMN nodes: the posterior cingulate cortex, the ventromedial prefrontal cortex, the left and right angular gyri and the left and right parahippocampi. Average time series were extracted from these spheres and the correlation coefficient of the time series of each DMN node with every other node was computed. This produced 15 unique correlation values, which were averaged together to produce a measure of overall connectivity for each subject. ANOVA tests were then done to find whether certain tumour types or tumour locations had significantly higher effects on the DMN. Furthermore, ICA with a temporal concatenation approach was performed with FSL’s MELODIC software package [7]. This method involves temporally concatenating all functional datasets (of all patients) and then performing ICA to extract a group wide DMN map. Then, subject DMN maps were backwards constructed using the recently developed dual regression method [8]. Briefly, the group-wide DMN spatial map was used as a spatial regressor to produce a DMN related “timeseries” for each patient; these time series were then used as a temporal regressor in a second regression analysis to extract DMN spatial maps for each subject. Then, non-parametric permutation tests were performed with 5000 permutations in order to test for significant differences between different groups of subjects based on tumour location. The multiple comparisons problem in this case was controlled with a cluster mass method derived from random field theory.

Results and discussion

The results are summarized in figure 4. With SBA and ANOVA testing, we found no significant differences between any two subdivisions of the tumour patient group. Tumour location, compartment (intra-axial vs extra-axial), histological type (glioma, meningioma, metastasis, lymphoma, kyste) and aggressiveness (infiltrative vs non infiltrative) were not found to be significant predictors of the tumour’s impact on the DMN. However, the lack of statistically significant results may be explained by the sensitivity of correlation analyses to the brain distorting effect of tumors. In fact, improper seed placement has been found to be an important confound in such correlation analyses [9]; anatomy distortion by massive tumors may have caused such improper seed placement.

The results of the ICA coupled with dual regression and non-parametric permutation tests are summarized in figure 1, 2 and 3. These tests found that tumours located in the left occipito-parietal lobe and the left temporal lobe caused statistically significant decreases in DMN connectivity, whereas tumors situated in the right sided counter parts of these regions did not. Moreover, tumors in the cerebellum also caused decreases in DMN connectivity.

Tumours in the frontal lobe caused nearly statistically significant decreases in DMN connectivity. These results, coupled with other studies done on the effect of tumours on the DMN, may lead to brain connectivity based prognostic scores which might help clinicians in evaluating the appropriateness of certain intervention in patients with brain tumours.

Acknowledgements

No acknowledgement found.

References

1. Broyd SJ, Demanuele C, Debener S, Helps SK, James CJ, Sonuga-Barke EJ (2009) Default-mode brain dysfunction in mental disorders: a systematic review. Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews 33: 279-296 doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2008.09.002

2. Harris RJ, Bookheimer SY, Cloughesy TF, Kim HJ, Pope WB, Lai A, Nghiemphu PL, Liau LM, Ellingson BM (2014) Altered functional connectivity of the default mode network in diffuse gliomas measured with pseudo-resting state fMRI. Journal of neuro-oncology 116: 373-379 doi:10.1007/s11060-013-1304-2

3. Esposito R, Mattei PA, Briganti C, Romani GL, Tartaro A, Caulo M (2012) Modifications of default-mode network connectivity in patients with cerebral glioma. PloS one 7: e40231 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0040231

4. Maesawa S, Bagarinao E, Fujii M, Futamura M, Motomura K, Watanabe H, Mori D, Sobue G, Wakabayashi T (2015) Evaluation of resting state networks in patients with gliomas: connectivity changes in the unaffected side and its relation to cognitive function. PloS one 10: e0118072 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0118072

5. Aurich NK, Alves Filho JO, Marques da Silva AM, Franco AR (2015) Evaluating the reliability of different preprocessing steps to estimate graph theoretical measures in resting state fMRI data. Frontiers in neuroscience 9: 48 doi:10.3389/fnins.2015.00048

6. Cox RW (1996) AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Computers and biomedical research, an international journal 29: 162-173

7. Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Woolrich MW, Beckmann CF, Behrens TE, Johansen-Berg H, Bannister PR, De Luca M, Drobnjak I, Flitney DE, Niazy RK, Saunders J, Vickers J, Zhang Y, De Stefano N, Brady JM, Matthews PM (2004) Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL. NeuroImage 23 Suppl 1: S208-219 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.07.051

8. Filippini N, MacIntosh BJ, Hough MG, Goodwin GM, Frisoni GB, Smith SM, Matthews PM, Beckmann CF, Mackay CE (2009) Distinct patterns of brain activity in young carriers of the APOE-epsilon4 allele. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106: 7209-7214 doi:10.1073/pnas.0811879106

9. Smith SM, Miller KL, Salimi-Khorshidi G, Webster M, Beckmann CF, Nichols TE, Ramsey JD, Woolrich MW (2011) Network modelling methods for FMRI. NeuroImage 54: 875-891 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.08.063

Figures

Each row is one of the subgroups which was largely different from control. The first three represent patients with tumour in the cerebellum, left temporal lobe and left occipito-parietal lobe, which were the only subgroups with statistically significant differences. The last row represents the subgroup of patients with tumour in the frontal lobe, whose connectivity differed largely from control, although this was not significant.

Significant clusters associated with figure 1.

* These p-values remained significant after an FDR correction with q<0.10 using the Benjamini and Hochberg procedure with m=7 (seven comparisons)


Group-wide DMN extracted from all subjects using the temporal concatenation approach with ICA. Functional data was overlaid over an MNI template image.

Summary of results



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
1687