Synopsis
We
test the validity of spatio-temporal
correlation tensor method on a set of rfMRI and DTI data which are acquired by multiband
EPI sequences and have the same slice and geometry parameters, so we can compare
the spatio-temporal correlation tensor and diffusion tensor at a voxel by voxel
level in the human brain. We find the spatio-temporal correlation tensor
derived from resting-state fMRI does not match with the diffusion tensor
calculated from diffusion weighted images in the white matter, which is contradictory
to a previous report of spatio-temporal correlation tensor method. Introduction
Determining connectivity
between cortical areas from resting-state fMRI (rfMRI) data has become an
important tool in neuroscience. However, the relation between this functional
connectivity and structural connectivity is still under investigation. Recently,
a research group developed a method of calculating local spatio-temporal
correlation tensor from the resting-state fMRI data [1-2]. They found this
method can detect the functional connectivity in the white matter, and furthermore
the spatio-temporal correlation tensor they derived matched with diffusion
tensor calculated from diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) in the white matter. It
is a remarkable approach. However this result has not been validated or duplicated
further. In this paper, we test this method on a set of rfMRI and DTI data
which are acquired by multiband EPI sequences [3] and have the same slice and
geometry parameters, so we can compare the spatio-temporal correlation tensor
and diffusion tensor at a voxel by voxel level.
Materials and Methods
The rfMRI and
DTI scans were performed on six healthy and right-handed subjects. They were
scanned on a Siemens 3T Prisma Fit system using a multiband EPI sequence [3].
Acquisition parameters of rfMRI were field of view (FOV) = 208 mm, matrix = 104
×104, repetition time (TR) = 720 ms, echo time (TE) = 46 ms, flip angle = 52°, multiband
factor = 8, and sixteen axial slices (2 mm thick without gap). The rfMRI scan
took about 5 minutes. Subjects were instructed to open their eyes and stay still.
The DTI scans had the same geometry coverage and parameters as the resting
state fMRI, but with the TR = 512 ms, TE = 72 ms, flip angle = 78°, multiband
factor = 4, six diffusion directions and four averages. The rfMRI data were
realigned to correct head motion. The data were regressed with the average
signals from CSF and white matter to remove the physiological noises. At each
voxel, the cross-correlation coefficients are calculated between it and 26
neighboring voxels. Thereafter, a spatial-temporal correlation tensor was
generated based on these 26 cross-correlation coefficients between the
neighboring voxels and current voxel [1-2], just as the computation of tensor and
eigenvectors in DTI. In the post-processing of DTI, the diffusion-weighted
images were corrected for motion artifacts and eddy current distortions. Thereafter,
diffusion tensor at each voxel was reconstructed form data with our Matlab
program. The maximum eigenvector was obtained from tensor at each voxel.
At the end, the angle
difference of the maximum eigenvectors of these two tensors derived from rfMRI
and DTI was compared and calculated at each voxel. As a validation, we also
used a conventional correlation analysis to detect the functional connectivity
of motor network on the acquired rfMRI data [4].
Results and Discussion
The
representative tensor orientation maps resulted from rfMRI and DTI are illustrated
in the Figure 1. The functional connectivity map of motor network generated by
conventional correlation analysis is also presented here, which proves the validity
of our rfMRI data. The tensor maps are found to be reproducible across subjects
in the DTI data, but not in the resting state fMRI. The angle difference of the
maximum eigenvectors of two tensors derived from rfMRI and DTI is presented in
Table 1. The differences are large at each voxel, especially at white matter. The
anisotropic spatio-temporal correlation tensors of rfMRI are not found in the most
voxels of white matter. This result may indicate that the spatio-temporal
correlation tensor might not be a reliable method to measure the functional
connectivity in the white matter of human brain. A similar experiment and scan protocol
setup may be needed to duplicate the similar results from previous reports [1-2].
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1] Ding Z, et al., PloS ONE: e82107, 2013.
[2] Wu TL. Proc ISMRM: 602, 2015.
[3] Feinberg, et al., PloS ONE: e15710, 2010.
[4] Zhuang, et al., Neuroimage 42: 799, 2008.