Hsiang-Yun Sherry Chien1, Susan Shur-Fen Gau2, and Wen-Yih Isaac Tseng1,3
1Institute of Medical Device and Imaging, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan, Taipei, Taiwan, 2Department of Psychiatry, National Taiwan University Hospital and College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan, Taipei, Taiwan, 3Molecular Imaging Center, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, Taipei, Taiwan
Synopsis
We
conducted a data-driven approach to investigate the functional and structural connectivity (FC and SC) within three
critical networks in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and typically developing controls (TD). We found significant weaker SC within the default-mode network, e.g. the cingulum bundles, in ASD compared to TD. Furthermore, we found significant
positive correlations between the FC of the right salience network and the SC
within the DMN and central executive network (CEN). Given the role of salience network in modulating the switch
between the DMN and CEN, our results might imply a distinctive FC-SC relationship across different networks in ASD.Purpose
Previous
studies documented the important role of salience network, which consists of
dorsal anterior cingulate cortex (dACC) and bilateral anterior insula (AI), in
dynamic switching between activation of the default-mode network (DMN) and of
the central executive network (CEN) to guide appropriate responses to salient
stimuli
1. Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental
disorder associated with the altered functional connectivity of brain networks
2.
Previous studies consistently reported the dysconnectivity of the DMN and salience network, and the distinctive between-network
communications in ASD
3,4,5. However, studies examining the relationships
between functional and structural connectivity (FC and SC) within and between
networks are still lacking. This study
aims to investigate the FC and SC of the salience network, DMN and CEN in ASD.
Methods – imaging acquisition and preprcessing
We
used resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI) and diffusion spectrum imaging (DSI) to
investigate the FC and SC, respectively. All data were acquired on a 3-Tesla Siemens Tim
Trio system.
Rs-fMRI (6-minute scan with eyes closed) data parameters: 180 echo planar
imaging (EPI) volumes; repetition time (TR) = 2000 ms; echo time (TE) = 24 ms;
flip angle = 90˚; field of view (FOV) = 256×256 mm^2; matrix size = 64×64; 34
axial slices acquired in an interleaved descending order; slice thickness = 3
mm; voxel size = 4×4×3 mm^3. Rs-fMRI data were preprocessed using the DPARSF
toolbox with SPM8. Motion artifact was
corrected by nuisance regression against 24-autoregressive motion parameters at
an individual level.
T1-weighted anatomical images were acquired
using a 3D magnetization-prepared rapid gradient echo sequence, TR = 2530 ms; TE = 3.4 ms; slice thickness = 1.0 mm; matrix size = 256×256; and FOV = 256×256 mm^2.
DSI data were
acquired by a twice-refocused balanced echo diffusion echo planar imaging
sequence, TR/TE = 9600/130 ms, imaging matrix size = 80 x 80, spatial resolution
= 2.5 x 2.5 mm^2, and slice thickness = 2.5 mm. 102 diffusion encoding
gradients with the maximum diffusion sensitivity bmax = 4000 s/mm^2 were applied to sample the grid points in a half sphere of the 3D
q-space with |q| ≤ 3.6 units.
Methods – data analysis
After
image preprocessing, the final sample included 78 with ASD and 69 typically
developing controls (TD) with age, gender and FIQ matched (Table1). We conducted independent
component analysis (ICA) using MELODIC in FSL 5.0.9, a data-driven approach to
identify the three functional networks and the regions of interest (ROIs) (e.g.
salience network: dACC, bilateral AI; DMN: medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC),
bilateral precuneus; CEN: bilateral posterior parietal cortex and dorsal lateral
prefrontal cortex) out of totally 55 components without making any prior
assumptions (Figure1). For the
SC analysis, the ROIs defined
by ICA were further transformed to the DSI study-specific template made by the averaged
individual DSI data to perform tractography and define tracts within the three
networks (Figure2). The general fractional anisotropy values (GFA) of each
tracts were sampled as the SC indices. For the FC analysis, 6-mm spheres
centered on the peak coordinates of those ROIs were made, and the temporal
correlations of blood-oxygen-level dependent signal between the ROIs within the
three networks were calculated as the FC indices (Figure3). Between-group
comparisons of the FC and SC were performaned using Multivariate Analysis of Covariance
controlling for the age effects. Partial correlations were performed to
investigate the relationships between FC and SC within the ASD and the TD group
controlling for the age effects.
Results
The
between-group comparisons showed that the GFA of the right DMN was
significantly lower (p = .022), and the GFA of the left DMN was marginally
significantly lower (p = .078) in the ASD group compared to the TD group. The
comparisons of the within-group correlations between the FC and SC showed that
the ASD group revealed overall more significant correlations between the FC and
SC compared to TD, including the positive FC-SC correlations within the DMN. Notably, the FC of the right salience network are distinctively correlated to
the SC of the DMN and CEN in the ASD group but not in the TD group (Figure4).
Discussion and Conclusion
In
our study, we conducted a data-driven approach to investigate the FC and SC
within three critical networks in ASD and TD. We found a significant weaker SC
within the DMN, e.g. the cingulum bundles, in ASD compared to TD. Furthermore, we
found significant positive correlations between the FC of the right salience
network and the SC within the
DMN and CEN. Given the role
of salience network in modulating the switch between the DMN and CEN, our results
might imply a distinctive FC-SC relationship
across different networks
in ASD.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Science Council of Taiwan (NSC99-2627-B-002-015, NSC100-2627-B-002-014, NSC101-2627-B-002-002, NSC100-2321-B-002-015, NSC101-2314-B-002-136-MY3), National Taiwan
University Hospital (NTUH101-S1910), AIM for Top University Excellent Research
Project (10R81918-03, 101R892103, 102R892103), and Ministry of Economic Affairs
(102-EC-17-A-19-S1-175).References
1. Uddin et al. (2015) Salience processing and insular cortical function and dysfunction, Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 16, 55–61
2. Kana et al. (2014) Brain connectivity in autism, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8: 349
3. Assaf et al. (2010) Abnormal functional connectivity of default mode sub-networks in autism spectrum disorder patients, NeuroImage, 53, 247–256
4. Uddin et al. (2013) Salience Network–Based Classification and Prediction of Symptom Severity in Children with Autism, JAMA Psychiatry, 70(8): 869–879
5. Nomi et al. (2015) Developmental changes in large-scale network connectivity in autism, NeuroImage: Clinical, 7, 732–741