Exploring Resting-State Functional Connectivity Invariants across the Life Span using a Novel Graph Model
Ottavia Dipasquale1,2, Paolo Finotelli3, Isa Costantini1, Giuseppe Baselli1, Francesca Baglio2, Paolo Dulio3, and Mara Cercignani4

1Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy, 2IRCCS, Don Gnocchi Foundation, Milan, Italy, 3Department of Mathematics "F. Brioschi", Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy, 4Clinical Imaging Sciences Centre, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom

Synopsis

In this work we investigated resting-state functional connectivity (FC) changes and invariant properties in 133 healthy people across the life-span (6-79y) using a novel graph model that emphasizes centrality of nodes. This model estimates a weight for each node’s pair (94 cortical regions) accounting for the node degrees, anatomical distance and FC between them and penalizing the formation of long connections. Preliminary findings in two groups of 25 and 62 year-old subjects highlighted a number of interesting properties and confirmed the important role of the Precuneus and the Cingulate Gyrus, which are characterized by high functional strength and degree.

Purpose

The goal of this work is to identify functional connectivity (FC) changes and invariant properties in healthy people across the life span, using a novel graph model that accounts for anatomical distance between nodes.

Theory

Our research bases on a recently proposed graph model for representing FC in healthy people1. The weights of the links are computed according to the following mathematical formula

$$ W_{ij}(t)=k(i)k(j)e^{-(\eta D_{ij}-F_{i,j}^{s}(t))}$$

being W(t)=[Wij(t)] the matrix of weights at the age t (in years), k(i),k(j) the degrees of nodes i,j, η a parameter which penalizes the formation of long connections2, D=[Dij] the structural connectivity matrix, and Fs(t)=[Fijs(t)] the FC matrix at time t, suitably thresholded, as described in the Methods.

The resulting weights keep into account not only the statistical dependency between pairs of nodes, but also their anatomical distance and their degrees, so that centrality of nodes is emphasized.

Methods

Resting-state fMRI (rfMRI) images (TR/TE=2500/30 ms; resolution=3.1x3.1x2.5mm3; 39 axial slices; 160 volumes) were acquired from 133 healthy right-handed volunteers (age range: 6-79 yrs; M/F: 51/82). High-resolution T1-weighted scans were also collected for anatomical reference. After standard preprocessing with FSL3, data were coregistered to MNI space using the Advanced Normalization Tools (ANTs)4.

For each subject, the average rfMRI time-series from 94 regions of interest (ROIs) defined by the Harvard-Oxford anatomical atlas were extracted. Subject-specific FC matrices were estimated by correlating each pair’s time-series.

The Euclidean distance between all the centroids of these regions was estimated and used as common structural connectivity index for all the subjects.

In order to compute the FC threshold, we firstly computed, by means of a histogram, the distribution of the functional values for the whole population. Then we selected the center values of the most populated bins, and set the threshold as the average of these center values. As no estimate is available for parameter η in the human brain, we assumed the value provided for macaques2 for any age t. The structural connectivity matrix D has been considered independent from time.

The extraction of a meaningful age-dependent representative graph required a second thresholding procedure on the weights of the corresponding population, in order to point out both the strongest functional values and the importance of the node degrees. Therefore, we grouped together all subjects having the same age. After collecting the distribution of values of the related matrices W, we thresholded each matrix with the center of the bin enclosing the highest values. Then, the resulting graphs of each subject have been joined together to get a Group Graph G(t), where links are weighted with the average values of each member, representing the resting state description of the whole t-aged group. As a final step the common active links can be extracted from the Group Graphs G(t1),…,G(tn) of differently t1,…,tn aged groups, so forming a Matching Graph M(t1,…,tn). Preliminary analyses were performed on two groups of 25 year-old (N=4) and 62 year-old subjects (N=3).

Results and Discussion

The two groups showed both common (M(25,62)) and age-specific connections (G(25) and G(62), see figure 1). From the preliminary data, several interesting results can be already discussed in view of a deeper analysis. First of all, the most important resting state network areas, including the default mode and frontal-executive networks, are included in M(25,62), consistent with the literature5. Second, the comparison of G(25) and G(62) might suggest that the density of active links increases with age. Further, several pathways detected in G(25) and G(62) are preserved in M(25,62), which could be interpreted as the age-related brain reserve capacity, i.e. the brain’s ability to effectively manage the increasing changes in normal aging and to cope with pathological damage. A main role seems to be played by the precuneus and the cingulate gyrus, which are characterized by high functional strength and degree, consistent with their role as hubs in cognition, as previously described in the literature6. These findings seem to agree with the results in7, where a general correspondence between functional and structural connectivity has been demonstrated across the cortex, pointing out that the structural core contains many connecting hubs, and centrality appears highest in the posterior cingulate cortex and in the Cuneus/Precuneus.

Conclusion

By exploiting a recent mathematical model for assigning weights to the functional connectivity, we have investigated changes and invariant properties of the functional connectivity in two different age groups of healthy people at rest. Results of this pilot study highlighted a number of interesting properties, whose investigation deserves to be deepened and extended to other age groups across the life span.

Acknowledgements

No acknowledgement found.

References

1. Finotelli, P., Dulio, P. A Mathematical Model for Evaluating the Functional Connectivity Strongness in Healthy People. Submitted to Archives Italiennes de Biologie.

2. Kaiser, M., Hilgetag, C.C., 2004. Spatial growth of real-world networks. Physical Review E. 69, 036103.

3. Beckmann, C.F., Smith, S.M., 2004. Probabilistic independent component analysis for functional magnetic resonance imaging. Medical Imaging, IEEE Transactions on. 23, 137-152.

4. Avants, B.B., Tustison, N.J., Song, G., Cook, P.A., Klein, A., Gee, J.C., 2011. A reproducible evaluation of ANTs similarity metric performance in brain image registration. Neuroimage. 54, 2033-2044.

5. Agcaoglu, O., Miller, R., Mayer, A., Hugdahl, K., Calhoun, V., 2015. Lateralization of resting state networks and relationship to age and gender. Neuroimage. 104, 310-325.

6. Buckner, R.L., Andrews-Hanna, J.R., Schacter, D.L., 2008. The brain's default network: Anatomy, function, and relevance to disease. Ann.N.Y.Acad.Sci. 1124, 1-38.

7. Hagmann, P., Cammoun, L., Gigandet, X., Meuli, R., Honey, C.J., Wedeen, V.J., Sporns, O., 2008. Mapping the structural core of human cerebral cortex. PLoS Biol. 6, e159.

Figures

Representation of the Group and Matching Graphs G(25), G(62) and M(25,62). G(25) and G(62) respectively represent all the supra-threshold links for the 25 and 62 year-old subjects. M(25,62) shows the common links for the two groups. Thickness of edges is proportional to the mean connectivity strength between each node’s pair.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
1656