Md Taufiq Nasseef1,2, Adam Liska1,2, Stefano Panzeri1, and Alessandro Gozzi1
1Italian Institute of Technology,Center for Neuroscience and Cognitive Systems @UniTn, Rovereto, Italy, 2Center for Mind/Brain Sciences, University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy
Synopsis
Mouse resting-state fMRI (rsfMRI) has revealed the presence
of distributed functional connectivity networks including two
sets of regions exhibiting neuro-anatomical features reminiscent of the human
salience (SN) and default-mode-network (DMN).
Here, we applied Granger Causality to investigate the direction of information
flow within mouse rsfMRI networks characterized by mono-directional and
reciprocal underlying axonal connectivity. We show that multiple intrinsic
rsfMRI networks of the mouse brain exhibit robust patterns of directional
connectivity towards prefrontal regions, replicating topological features of
human rsfMRI networks, and in agreement with higher integrative role subserved
by these areas.
Purpose
Intrinsic functional connectivity mapping via resting-state BOLD fMRI (rsfMRI) has highlighted the presence of spatially-correlated spontaneous oscillations defining reproducible brain network systems underlying known as well as less understood brain functions. However, classic rsfMRI approaches typically rely on correlational connectivity measurements intrinsically insensitive to the direction of information flow among affected regions1. The recent development of computational approaches enabling a description of rsfMRI networks in directional terms has highlighted the possibility of effectively describe how brain region interact and communicate in the resting-state, with encouraging initial results. Multivariate Granger Causality (GC)2 in humans highlighted putative causal interactions between distributed rsfMRI networks, and revealed robust directional insular and middle temporal to prefrontal connectivity as well as a major receiving role from hippocampal formation areas3.
By employing rigorous control of motion and physiological artefacts, we have recently shown the presence of robust and reproducible rsfMRI networks in the mouse brain, including SN and a putative default mode network (DMN)4,5. Here, we applied GC to probe group- and subject level directional functional connectivity among key nodes of distributed mouse rsfMRI networks. In particular, we first validated our GC methodology by demonstrating its ability to reveal directed connectivity in the ventro-hippocampal-prefrontal network, a neural system well studied in rodents and humans6,7 and characterised by mono-directional underlying axonal connectivity8,9. We then used this methodology to examine directional functional connectivity in key nodes of the mouse brain insular-prefrontal (“salience”-like) and DMN, two distributed systems characterized by complex anatomical connectivity patterns8, and that could putatively be related to analogous human networks.
Methods
Experiments were performed on male C57BL/6J (B6)
mice (n=41) as previously described
4,5. RsfMRI
timeseries were acquired under halothane anaesthesia (0.7%).
Image acquisition: All experiments
were performed by a 7.0 Tesla MRI scanner, using a single-shot EPI sequence
with TR/TE 1200/15 ms, flip angle 30°, matrix 100 × 100, field of view 2 × 2 cm
2,
24 coronal slices, slice thickness 0.50 mm and a total rsfMRI acquisition time
of 6 min.
Image preprocessing: images
were motion corrected, spatially normalized, smoothed band-pass filtered and regression
of motion traces and the mean ventricular signal was applied.
Granger causality (GC) analysis: We
defined multiple sets of seed ROIs within the mouse Hippocampus-PFC network, SN
& DMN that can be related to analogous key subsystems of the human. For
each set of network we computed unconditional GC( UGC)
2 and conditional
GC(CGC)
2(one node conditional GC(1C-GC) and 2C-GC for 4 node network
probing) along with dominant directional causality
10 defined as the
difference between causality in each direction.
Subject level analysis: we used iMAAFT
11
non-parametric surrogates’ construction methods to generate 1000 surrogates for
each pair of regions and selected significance as p<0.05, FDR corrected.
Results and discussion
We first fine-tuned GC
analysis by applying over different GC measures to find similar directionality
patterns following the anatomical monodirectional wiring of the ventro-hippocampal-prefrontal(vHC-PFC)
network at both population and subject level (Fig. 1). CGC revealed robust and
reproducible directional connectivity patterns along direction of hippocampal
axonal projections
8,9. Probing of the insular prefrontal system highlighted
the presence of dominant antero-posterior functional connectivity patterns
reminiscent of directional features recently described for the human salience
network
12,13(Fig. 2). To
understand the effect of limited data size in four node network, we carried out
simulation on different sample size of the data using full VAR
2
model fitted to all nodes in vHC-Rs-PFC network and found evidence that 1C-GC
was the most efficient compared to other GC strategies (Fig. 3). We applied
this approach to probe a four key nodes of the mouse DMN and observed the
presence of robust directional functional connectivity between temporal
associative and prefrontal regions, together with a “sink effect” of
retrosplenial cortex with respect of temporal cortical areas, recapitulating analogous
human findings
14,15(Fig. 4). All the effects were reproduced with
different sets of ROIs and also in data added with pink noise to homogenize
signal throughout the brain.
Conclusion
We
demonstrate robust directional connectivity patterns in distributed rsfMRI
networks of the mouse brain, including converging dominant connectivity between
lateral cortical areas and medial prefrontal and cingulate regions, replicating
topological features of known human
rsfMRI networks, and consistent with a higher integrative function
subserved by these areas. These results provide a novel interpretative window
on the intrinsic functional architecture of the mouse brain at the macroscale.
Acknowledgements
Supported
by the SI-CODE project of the FET FP7 Programme for Research of the European
Commission (under FET-Open Grant FP7284553).References
[1] Bullmore and Sporns. Nat Rev Neurosci.
2009;10:186-198 [2] Barnett and Seth. J Neurosci Meth. 2014;223:50-68 [3]
Deshpande et al., NeuroImage. 2011;54:1043-1052 [4] Yang et al., Nat Neurosci. 2014; 17:400-406 [5] Sforazzini et
al., NeuroImage 2014; 87:403-415 [6] Zhan et al.;
Nat Neurosci 2014; 17:400-406 [7] Schwarz et al., J
Neurosci. 2013; 228:243-258 [ 8]
Vertes, Synapse 2004, 51:32–58
[9] Hoover et al., Brain Struct
Funct. 2007, 212:149–179 [10] Roebroeck
et al. Neuroimage 2005; 25:230-242 [11] Schreiber
et al.,Phys. D Nonlinear Phenom. 2000, 142, 3–4: 346–382 [12] Sridharan et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105, 2008, 34:
12569-74 [13] Chen et al.,Eur
J Neurosci. 2015,41:264-274 [14] Jiao et al. Hum Brain Mapp. 2011;32: 154-161 [15] Di et al., NeuroImage 2013; 86:53-59