Takeshi Yoshikawa1, Katsusuke Kyotani2, Yoshiharu Ohno1, Shinichiro Seki3, Hisanobu Koyama3, Kouya Nishiyama2, and Kazuro Sugimura3
1Advanced Biomedical Imaging Research Center, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan, 2Radiology, Kobe University Hospital, Kobe, Japan, 3Radiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
Synopsis
We
introduced new assessment method of liver hemodynamics using 4D-PCA and new flow
analytic technique including wall shear stresses. We found 4D-PCA can be
clinically used as a non-contrast angiography and our approach enables detailed
hemodynamic assessment for each hepatic vessel.INTRODUCTION
Liver
has a unique hemodynamic system which is neither fully recognized nor
understood. Shear stresses to the liver and its vessels have been reported to
play important roles to keep liver function and control its regeneration.
Non-contrast
MRA using four-dimensional phase-contrast magnetic resonance angiography (4D-PCA) technique becomes clinically available and
hemodynamic assessments using its cine data is reportedly useful for
evaluations of cerebral and aortic aneurysms.
We
applied these techniques to hemodynamic assessments of whole liver vessels.
PURPOSE
Our purpose was to assess hepatic
vasculatures and hemodynamics using 4D-PCA and detailed hemodynamic analysis technique including wall shear stress parameters to vessel walls.
MATERIALS & METHODS
Patients
& MRI Techniques
19
patients (9 men, 8 women, mean 64.2 years old), who were suspected to have
hepato-biliary-pancreatic malignancy and underwent 3T-MRI, were enrolled. 4D-PCA
were obtained (dSTorso, TR/TE/FA:4.1/2.4/10, matrix:240x191 (ZIP256x256),
FOV:400mm, thk:120mm, slice number:60, voxel:1.6x1.6x2.0mm, NEX:1, PI:3.0 (RL),
10aqs/cardiac cycle, scan time:6-10min, pulse gating). 4D-PCA was obtained
before and after Gd-EOB-DTPA administration in 8 patients, and obtained with
VENCs of 30 and 80 cm/s in other 11.
Visual
Assessments
Visualizations
of abdominal aorta, celiac, common and proper hepatic, superior mesenteric,
splenic arteries, main, right, left portal, superior mesenteric, splenic,
hepatic veins, and inferior vena cava, were scored using a 5-point scale
(1:poor, 5:excellent), and were compared between pre- and post-contrast and the
two VENCs.
Hemodynamic
Assessments
Using
cine data obtained with 4D-PCA, hemodynamic assessments of each vessel were
performed on a software (FLOVA, R'Tech). Blood flow and velocity in vessel, and
shear stresses to vessel wall such as wall shear stress (WSS), oscillatory
shear gradient (OSI), spatial WSS gradient (SWSSG), gradient oscillatory number
(GON) were measured.
RESULTS
Visual
Assessments
Visualization
scores were more than 4 except for hepatic arteries and improved after EOB
administration.
Scores
were higher with 30 cm/s than 80 in proper hepatic artery and all the veins.
Hemodynamic
Assessments
Hemodynamic
assessment required approximately 1 hour for each patient and could be done in
all the vessels except for proper hepatic arteries with diameters <4mm.
The
results are shown in Table 1.
DISCCUSSION
In
4D-PCA, vessel visualizations were improved after Gd-EOB-DTPA. The results were
similar to the previous reports using other Gd and SPIO contrast agents.
4D-PCA
can be clinically used as a non-contrast angiography. Further
improvement of visualization is required for tiny abdominal vessels.
Hemodynamic
assessments for each hepatic vessel could be done in short time.
However,
optimal assessment scheme is still unknown.
CONCLUSION
4D-PCA can be clinically used as a non-contrast angiography. Cine data enables detailed hemodynamic assessment for each hepatic vessel.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
Mano
Y, et al. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2013.
Cheng
CP, et al. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physio. 2003.
Stalder
AF, et al. MRM 2008.
Piva
A, et al . Scand J Gastroenterol 2012.