Wolfgang Loew1, Robert Thomen1, Randy Giaquinto1, Ron Pratt1, Zackary Cleveland1, Laura Walkup1, Charles Dumoulin1, and Jason Woods1
1Imaging Research Center, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, United States
Synopsis
Hyperpolarized gas
MRI of lungs requires homogeneous RF excitation and high SNR for proper spin-density
mapping with low flip angles. A dual loop T/R 129Xe coil was designed
and constructed to provide flexibility for a wide range of patient sizes while maintaining
high transmit/receive homogeneity for hyperpolarized 129Xe imaging
and therefore provide high-quality images for identifying and quantifying functional
pulmonary deficiencies. Electromagnetic field simulations were used to analyze
excitation profiles.Purpose
Hyperpolarized (HP)
129Xe MRI can reveal information concerning lung ventilation
1,
gas exchange
2-4, and microstructural dimensions
5-6. For HP gas imaging to accurately analyze
lung function and identify ventilation deficiencies, it is necessary to achieve
a homogenous excitation profile. However, scanner bore diameter sets a hard boundary
upon coil size and fundamentally limits coil development, necessitating tradeoffs
between quality and functionality. For example, birdcages have superior
excitation profiles and yield superior SNR to surface coils, but an insertable birdcage
would reduce patient comfort and be limited to smaller patients. To
simultaneously achieve patient comfort, ease of use and image homogeneity, a
dual loop T/R
129Xe coil was developed to provide homogenous
excitation for a large range of patient sizes. An electromagnetic model was
created to analyze the transmit efficiency of this new design compared to a
saddle coil design
7.
Materials
and Methods
Physical
Design: To achieve a more homogenous excitation and receive profile
two loop coils were constructed with a length of 424mm, a width of 380.5mm for
the anterior coil and 409.6mm for the posterior coil. To provide robust
mechanical support for subjects and coil electronics, each loop was housed in a
lightweight 3D printed polycarbonate frame. The anterior housing was designed as an open
loop (Figure 1) and the posterior frame was sandwiched in foam. Each coil loop was constructed with ¼”
copper tubing and 8 cuts: 1 cut to accommodate the feedboard attached to a
coaxial cable and 7 cuts to accommodate tuning capacitors. Passive proton
decoupling was added to each coil. To suppress cable currents one xenon balun
and three proton baluns were added to the cable. Both coils were connected to a
custom-built Wilkinson divider, which was connected to a custom T/R switch
displayed in Figure 2.
Coil
simulation: Transmit efficiency was evaluated in an EM
Simulation using HFSS (ANSYS) and compared to the efficiency of a previously-built
saddle coil7.
Both coils were modeled after the physical design and loaded with an elliptical
phantom measuring 400x210x340mm3. A dielectric constant of 77.53 and a
conductivity of 0.7S/m was used for the phantom. Additionally, two air-filled
cylinders were placed in the center of the phantom to replicate the lungs. Each
coil was resonated at 35.329MHz with a resulting reflection coefficient of -25.6dB
for the anterior and -32.7dB for the posterior coil of the dual loop design while
being excited with a continuous 1W, 50Ω source. Coupling was calculated with
-3.84dB between both loop coils. The setup was surrounded by a replicated RF
shield. For safety purposes local SAR values were also analyzed in the
simulation.
In-Vivo MRI: Isotopically enriched xenon (86% 129Xe)
was polarized to 32% using a homebuilt polarizer (50/50 mixture of 129Xe/N2).
Axial, multi-slice GRE images (α=11º,TE/TR=4.49/9.36ms, BW=4.2kHz,
matrix=92x54, voxel size= 3x3x15mm3, 1 average) were acquired from
healthy volunteers in a single breath hold (<16s) using a Philips 3T
Achieva™ scanner (Philips Healthcare, Best, Netherlands).
Results
Based on
simulations, the B
1+ distribution in the center planes of
the phantom (Figure 3) includes a larger homogeneous region than the previously
designed saddle coil
7. The simulated B
1+
variation through the phantom using the dual loop design showed a minimal
fluctuation of 0.2µT over the three axis, whereas the previous design had a
much larger variation in its B
1+ distribution of more
than 1µT. Simulations also showed that local SAR limits of 10W/kg were
reached with a 49.24W continuous wave excitation, with a local “hot spot”
located on the left and right side of the phantom towards the anterior part of
the coil (Figure 4). A maximum B
1+
of 2.76µT was found in the center of the phantom with these settings in the
simulation.
Using this coil,
single-breath, HP
129Xe ventilation images were successfully
acquired in healthy, pediatric volunteers (e.g., Figure 5). These images
demonstrate that the coil generated very homogenous signal intensity for
diagnostic imaging. Moreover, the SNR of these images was ~25, which is more
than sufficient for quantitative analysis of
129Xe ventilation.
Conclusion and Discussion
In-vivo HP
129Xe imaging demonstrated excellent coil homogeneity for
large subject lungs. The dual loop design allowed for comfortable subject
breathing and made the coil robust for a much larger range of patient sizes. The dual coil does have lower SNR and efficiency
than the earlier saddle coil
7 design. However, the lower SNR can be explained by
the larger size of the loop elements, which will contribute to more noise in
the acquired data. High coupling was observed between both loop coils due to
the size of the loops and small separation distance compared to the loop diameter.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. LL Walkup and JC
Woods, NMR Biomed., DOI:
10.1002/nbm.3151 (2014).
2. ZI
Cleveland, et al., Plos One 5 (8),
e12192 (2010).
3. JP Mugler, et
al., PNAS 107 (50), 21707-21712
(2010).
4. K Qing, et al, J Magn. Reson. Imaging 39 (2), 346–359
(2014).
5. SS Kaushik, et al., J Appl. Physiol. 115 (6), 850-860 (2013).
6. I Dregely, et al., J Magn. Reson. Imaging 33(5), 1052-62
(2011).
7. W Loew, et al., 1507 ISMRM
proceedings(2015).