A Dual Loop T/R-Xenon Coil for Homogenous Excitation with Improved Comfort and Size
Wolfgang Loew1, Robert Thomen1, Randy Giaquinto1, Ron Pratt1, Zackary Cleveland1, Laura Walkup1, Charles Dumoulin1, and Jason Woods1

1Imaging Research Center, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, United States

Synopsis

Hyperpolarized gas MRI of lungs requires homogeneous RF excitation and high SNR for proper spin-density mapping with low flip angles. A dual loop T/R 129Xe coil was designed and constructed to provide flexibility for a wide range of patient sizes while maintaining high transmit/receive homogeneity for hyperpolarized 129Xe imaging and therefore provide high-quality images for identifying and quantifying functional pulmonary deficiencies. Electromagnetic field simulations were used to analyze excitation profiles.

Purpose

Hyperpolarized (HP) 129Xe MRI can reveal information concerning lung ventilation1, gas exchange2-4, and microstructural dimensions5-6. For HP gas imaging to accurately analyze lung function and identify ventilation deficiencies, it is necessary to achieve a homogenous excitation profile. However, scanner bore diameter sets a hard boundary upon coil size and fundamentally limits coil development, necessitating tradeoffs between quality and functionality. For example, birdcages have superior excitation profiles and yield superior SNR to surface coils, but an insertable birdcage would reduce patient comfort and be limited to smaller patients. To simultaneously achieve patient comfort, ease of use and image homogeneity, a dual loop T/R 129Xe coil was developed to provide homogenous excitation for a large range of patient sizes. An electromagnetic model was created to analyze the transmit efficiency of this new design compared to a saddle coil design7.

Materials and Methods

Physical Design: To achieve a more homogenous excitation and receive profile two loop coils were constructed with a length of 424mm, a width of 380.5mm for the anterior coil and 409.6mm for the posterior coil. To provide robust mechanical support for subjects and coil electronics, each loop was housed in a lightweight 3D printed polycarbonate frame. The anterior housing was designed as an open loop (Figure 1) and the posterior frame was sandwiched in foam. Each coil loop was constructed with ¼” copper tubing and 8 cuts: 1 cut to accommodate the feedboard attached to a coaxial cable and 7 cuts to accommodate tuning capacitors. Passive proton decoupling was added to each coil. To suppress cable currents one xenon balun and three proton baluns were added to the cable. Both coils were connected to a custom-built Wilkinson divider, which was connected to a custom T/R switch displayed in Figure 2.

Coil simulation: Transmit efficiency was evaluated in an EM Simulation using HFSS (ANSYS) and compared to the efficiency of a previously-built saddle coil7. Both coils were modeled after the physical design and loaded with an elliptical phantom measuring 400x210x340mm3. A dielectric constant of 77.53 and a conductivity of 0.7S/m was used for the phantom. Additionally, two air-filled cylinders were placed in the center of the phantom to replicate the lungs. Each coil was resonated at 35.329MHz with a resulting reflection coefficient of -25.6dB for the anterior and -32.7dB for the posterior coil of the dual loop design while being excited with a continuous 1W, 50Ω source. Coupling was calculated with -3.84dB between both loop coils. The setup was surrounded by a replicated RF shield. For safety purposes local SAR values were also analyzed in the simulation.

In-Vivo MRI: Isotopically enriched xenon (86% 129Xe) was polarized to 32% using a homebuilt polarizer (50/50 mixture of 129Xe/N2). Axial, multi-slice GRE images (α=11º,TE/TR=4.49/9.36ms, BW=4.2kHz, matrix=92x54, voxel size= 3x3x15mm3, 1 average) were acquired from healthy volunteers in a single breath hold (<16s) using a Philips 3T Achieva™ scanner (Philips Healthcare, Best, Netherlands).

Results

Based on simulations, the B1+ distribution in the center planes of the phantom (Figure 3) includes a larger homogeneous region than the previously designed saddle coil7. The simulated B1+ variation through the phantom using the dual loop design showed a minimal fluctuation of 0.2µT over the three axis, whereas the previous design had a much larger variation in its B1+ distribution of more than 1µT. Simulations also showed that local SAR limits of 10W/kg were reached with a 49.24W continuous wave excitation, with a local “hot spot” located on the left and right side of the phantom towards the anterior part of the coil (Figure 4). A maximum B1+ of 2.76µT was found in the center of the phantom with these settings in the simulation. Using this coil, single-breath, HP 129Xe ventilation images were successfully acquired in healthy, pediatric volunteers (e.g., Figure 5). These images demonstrate that the coil generated very homogenous signal intensity for diagnostic imaging. Moreover, the SNR of these images was ~25, which is more than sufficient for quantitative analysis of 129Xe ventilation.

Conclusion and Discussion

In-vivo HP 129Xe imaging demonstrated excellent coil homogeneity for large subject lungs. The dual loop design allowed for comfortable subject breathing and made the coil robust for a much larger range of patient sizes. The dual coil does have lower SNR and efficiency than the earlier saddle coil7 design. However, the lower SNR can be explained by the larger size of the loop elements, which will contribute to more noise in the acquired data. High coupling was observed between both loop coils due to the size of the loops and small separation distance compared to the loop diameter.

Acknowledgements

No acknowledgement found.

References

1. LL Walkup and JC Woods, NMR Biomed., DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3151 (2014).

2. ZI Cleveland, et al., Plos One 5 (8), e12192 (2010).

3. JP Mugler, et al., PNAS 107 (50), 21707-21712 (2010).

4. K Qing, et al, J Magn. Reson. Imaging 39 (2), 346–359 (2014).

5. SS Kaushik, et al., J Appl. Physiol. 115 (6), 850-860 (2013).

6. I Dregely, et al., J Magn. Reson. Imaging 33(5), 1052-62 (2011).

7. W Loew, et al., 1507 ISMRM proceedings(2015).

Figures

Figure 1: Dual loop T/R 129Xe coil.

Figure 2: System coil setup.

Figure 3: Comparison of B1+ distribution through the phantom between saddle coil7 and dual loop coil.

Figure 4: Simulated local SAR with coil conductors and feedboard.

Figure 5: In-vivo 129Xe ventilation images a) acquired with the saddle coil7 and b) acquired with the dual loop coil.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
1624