T1 relaxation time in lungs of asymptomatic smokers
Daniel Alamidi1, Simon Kindvall2, Penny Hubbard Cristinacce3, Deirdre McGrath3, Simon Young4, Josephine Naish3, John Waterton3, Per Wollmer5, Sandra Diaz5, Marita Olsson6, Paul Hockings7,8, Kerstin Lagerstrand1, Geoffrey Parker3,9, and Lars E Olsson2

1Department of Radiation Physics, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden, 2Department of Medical Physics, Lund University, Translational Sciences, Malmö, Sweden, 3Centre for Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Imaging Institute, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom, 4AstraZeneca R&D, Alderley Park, United Kingdom, 5Department of Translational Medicine, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden, 6AstraZeneca R&D, Mölndal, Sweden, 7Medtech West, Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg, Sweden, 8Antaros Medical, BioVenture Hub, Mölndal, Sweden, 9Bioxydyn Ltd, Manchester, United Kingdom

Synopsis

Tobacco smoking is the primary cause of COPD. MRI may improve the characterization of COPD where T1 of the lungs is a potential biomarker. We investigated whether smoking affects lung T1 in individuals with no known lung disease. Lung T1 measurements were performed in asymptomatic current and never smokers. T1 was shortened with age and an indication of shortened T1 in smokers was observed that most likely reflects early signs of smoking-induced lung pathology. Our results may be of utility to power future prospective studies with larger cohorts and improved regional analysis.

Purpose

Lung T1 is a potential MRI biomarker of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)1,2 which is commonly caused by tobacco smoking. Smoking might affect the evaluation of lung T1 due to the presence of paramagnetic substances trapped in the lung tissue3 or the subsequent lung damage. The aim for this study was to examine whether tobacco smoking, pack years (PY), influenced T1 of the lung parenchyma in individuals with no known lung disease, to separate the smoking effect from disease related factors.

Methods

Informed consent was taken from 35 asymptomatic volunteers, 23 never smokers and 12 current smokers that underwent MRI scanning and spirometry and reported physiological data. A snapshot FLASH acquisition4 was carried out on a 1.5 T Philips Achieva system (Philips Medical Systems, Best, NL) during free breathing (TR=2.2 ms, TE=1.0 ms, FA=5°, FOV=4452 mm2, slice thickness=15 mm, matrix=64x256 (zero filled to 256x256), NA=10) and on a 1.5 T-Siemens Magnetom Avanto Fit (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) during a light inspiration breath hold over 3 seconds (TR=3 ms, TE=0.7 ms, FA=7°, FOV=4502 mm2, slice thickness=15 mm, matrix=128x64 (zero filled to 256x256)). No significant difference on T1 was found the between the systems among the never smokers (p=0.35). Median lung T1 values were calculated by fitting the Look-Locker equation5 pixel-by-pixel and large pulmonary vessels were excluded in the quantification. A backward linear model approach was used with FEV1, FVC, weight, height, age and PY as covariates to investigate the most important variables in determining the value of a response on T1.

Results

The final backward regression model included age and PY with negative slopes of -3.1 ms/year (95%CI [-5.5, -0.6], p=0.02) and -2.3 ms/PY (95%CI [-4.9, 0.3], p=0.08), respectively. The negative slope was -4.0 ms/year (95%CI [-6.3, -1.7], p=0.001) when only age was included in the model with r=-0.52, indicating that lung T1 shortens with ageing (Fig 1). Among the never smokers, the slope of T1 as a function of age was found to be -3.7 ms/year (95%CI [-6.0, -1.3], p=0.003).

Discussion

Lung T1 shortens with ageing and smoking did not reach significant correlation to T1 (p=0.08). Age is a significant confounding factor when T1 is used as a biomarker in lung MRI studies that must be taken into account to detect underlying patterns of disease. The observed indication with shortened T1 in the smokers (p=0.08) most likely reflects early signs of smoking-induced lung pathology, that is not picked up by the spirometric measurements, rather than paramagnetic substances. Structural lung changes has been found in asymptomatic smokers with He-3 imaging6 that correlated ADC values and PY in asymptomatic subjects with similar smoking histories as in the present study. Lung T1 as a biomarker needs to be validated in larger cohorts with improved regional analysis that would increase the possibility to find a T1 relationship to PY. Our results may be of utility to power future prospective studies and increase the knowledge of the lung T1 relationship to tobacco smoking.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by AstraZeneca and Allmänna Sjukhusets i Malmö stiftelse för bekämpande av Cancer.

References

[1] Alamidi et al. COPD:JCOPD 2015 Oct 21:1-7. [2] Jobst et al. Plos One 2015;10:3. [3] Kilburn. Environ Health Perspect 1984;55:97. [4] Jakob PM et al. JMRI 2001;14:795-799. [5] Deichmann R and Haase A. JMRI 1992;96:608-612. [6] Fain et al. Radiology 2006:239:875-883.

Figures

Fig 1. Lung T1 as a function of age for all subjects. Significant correlation between median lung T1 and age for smokers (●) and never smokers (○) was found (p<0.01, r=-0.52), indicating that lung T1 shortens with ageing.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
1612