Marissa Albert1, Genevieve Bennett1, Jonathan Melamed2, and Nicole Hindman1
1Radiology, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States, 2Pathology, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States
Synopsis
Mature
cystic teratomas of the ovary are a common ovarian neoplasm, particularly in young patients. The majority of these
neoplasms are benign; only a small minority demonstrates malignant potential. Distinguishing benign from malignant tumors is difficult on imaging alone, but has important clinical implications with regards to follow up and surgical
excision. This
study is the first in the literature to describe the incidence of, and type of,
noduar enhancement within benign mature cystic teratomas. Fat containing ovarian lesions with an
internal nodule demonstrating peripheral enhancement and internal fat, along
with acute angles and lack of extension beyond the cystic wall, can be confidently diagnosed as having a benign nodule and thus compatible with
benign mature cystic teratoma. Purpose
To
evaluate the features of ovarian mature cystic teratomas which are useful in
diagnosing benign tumors.
Background
Mature
cystic teratomas of the ovary are a common ovarian neoplasm, particularly in
patients under the age of 45
1. The majority of
these neoplasms are benign; only a small minority demonstrates malignant
potential. This distinction is difficult to make on imaging alone.
2,3 Transmural growth and
invasion into adjacent organs distinguishes malignant tumor from benign.
2,4,5 In the absence of
such overt features, the presence of an enhancing solid component has been
postulated as an indicator of malignancy.
5-8 Given the high
incidence of teratomas, determining benignity has important clinical
implications with regards to follow up and surgical excision. For example, many
gynecologic surgeons will not perform a minimally invasive operation on
patients with suspected malignant teratoma; thus patients who desire
laparoscopic surgery may instead undergo a large midline laparotomy, which has
both cosmetic and morbidity implications.
Methods
This
study was HIPPA compliant and IRB approved. A systematic review was performed of our
institution’s imaging and pathology archives from January 2008 through
September 2015 for examinations in which key words “dermoid” and teratoma”
appeared in the body or impression of the report. Inclusion criteria included
the presence of suspected teratoma and either 2 year imaging follow up or
surgical excision.
Two
readers blinded to the pathology and radiologic follow-up independently reviewed each
case for the presence of a solid component and the following characteristics:
presence of enhancement, type of enhancement (peripheral or solid), angle between the solid component and cyst wall, border of the solid component (smooth or
irregular), border of the cyst (smooth or irregular), presence of intravoxel or
bulk fat, and presence of restricted diffusion. The presence of ascites and
metastasis was also evaluated. Statistical analysis was performed utilizing a Student's t-test.
Results
66
cases were included in the study. 59 were benign, and 7 of the tumors were
malignant Final pathology of malignant lesions were: malignant degeneration
into squamous cell carcinoma (2), immature teratoma (3), and collision tumors
(2). There was very good to excellent
inter-reader agreement (kappa values 0.8-0.9 for all variables). A solid
component was seen in all malignant nodules (p<0.001), however solid
component was also seen in 43 of 59 benign nodules. There was no significant
difference in the presence of enhancement of the solid component between benign
and malignant tumors (p=0.03). However, peripheral enhancement was seen only in
benign nodules (p<0.0001) and in no malignant nodules. Confinement of the
nodule to the cyst wall (p=0.002), presence of intravoxel or bulk fat in the
solid nodule (p<0.001), and a smooth cystic border (p=0.03) were all
significantly correlated with benignity. An obtuse angle of the nodule and
irregular margin were both statistically significant indicators of malignancy
(p=0.003 and 0<0.001, respectively). Tumor size was larger in
malignancy (range 1.2-25.6 cm for benign dermoids; range 4.8-29.6 cm for
malignant). Diffusion restriction in the nodule did not correlate with
malignancy (p=0.1), nor did a unilocular versus multilocular configuration (p=
0.4). Physiologic ascites was seen in most cases, therefore presence of ascites
also did not correlate with malignancy. No distant metastases were seen in any
cases.
Discussion
Mature
cystic teratomas are a common benign tumor.
Increased imaging of these benign lesions with sensitive imaging
modalities such as MRI has led to increased sensitivity in detecting subtle
enhancement within the Rokitansky nodule.
This finding has previously been described as worrisome for malignancy,
therefore the detection of enhancement within young women with an otherwise
benign-appearing mature cystic teratoma has led to uncertainty about the
possibility of these lesions harboring malignancy. Reports questioning the presence of malignancy cause the referring gynecologic surgeon to change their operative
technique from a minimally invasive technique to an open laparotomy. This study is the first in the literature to
describe the incidence of, and type of, solid nodular enhancement within benign
mature cystic teratomas. Fat
containing ovarian lesions with an internal nodule demonstrating peripheral
enhancement and internal fat, acute angles and no extension
beyond the cystic wall, can be confidently diagnosed as having a
benign nodule and thus compatible with benign mature cystic teratoma. We theorize that this peripheral enhancement
within the nodule reflects reactive hyperemia of the margin of the Rokitansky
nodule from adjacent mild inflammatory changes in the mature cystic teratoma.
Conclusion
Enhancement
of solid Rokinasky nodules can be seen commonly in benign mature cystic
teratomas. In particular, peripheral
enhancement of a smoothly marginated nodule which is confined to the cyst
wall in a fat containing lesion should not raise concern for malignancy.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Millet I, Perrochia H, Pages-Bouic E,
Curros-Doyon F, Rathat G, Taourel P. CT and MR of Benign Ovarian Germ Cell
Tumours. Ovarian Neoplasm Imaging:
Springer; 2013:155-76.
2. Saba L, Guerriero S, Sulcis R, Virgilio B, Melis G,
Mallarini G. Mature and immature ovarian teratomas: CT, US and MR imaging
characteristics. European journal of radiology 2009;72:454-63.
3. Outwater EK, Siegelman ES, Hunt JL. Ovarian Teratomas: Tumor
Types and Imaging Characteristics 1. Radiographics 2001;21:475-90.
4. Kim KA, Park CM, Lee JH, et al. Benign ovarian tumors with
solid and cystic components that mimic malignancy. American Journal of
Roentgenology 2004;182:1259-65.
5. Park SB, Kim JK, Kim KR, Cho KS. Preoperative diagnosis of
mature cystic teratoma with malignant transformation: analysis of imaging
findings and clinical and laboratory data. Archives of gynecology and
obstetrics 2007;275:25-31.
6. Buy J, Ghossain M, Moss A, et al. Cystic teratoma of the
ovary: CT detection. Radiology 1989;171:697-701.
7. Park SB, Cho K-S, Kim JK. CT findings of mature cystic
teratoma with malignant transformation: comparison with mature cystic teratoma.
Clinical imaging 2011;35:294-300.
8. Kido A, Togashi K, Konishi I, et al. Dermoid cysts of the
ovary with malignant transformation: MR appearance. AJR American journal of
roentgenology 1999;172:445-9.