The effect of hyperbaric oxygen therapy on healthy and diabetic rat kidneys measured with hyperpolarised [1-13C]pyruvate
Thomas Stokholm Nørlinger1, Per Mose Nielsen1, Emmeli Mikkelsen1, Haiyun Qi1, Kasper Hansen2, Peter Kolstrup Agger3, Nikolaj Schmidt2, Michael Pedersen2, Hans Stødkilde-Jørgensen1, Frederik Palm4, and Christoffer Laustsen1

1Department of Clinical Medicine, MR Research Centre, Aarhus, Denmark, 2Department of Clinical Medicine, Comparative Medicine Lab, Aarhus, Denmark, 3Dept. of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, Aarhus, Denmark, 4Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Division of Drug Research, Linköping, Sweden

Synopsis

Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBO) is a well-known adjuvant treatment for several medical conditions indicated by the Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society. It is generally well tolerated and the kidneys display no adverse side effects after HBO. In diabetes hypoxia has been shown to be an important contributing factor in the development of diabetic nephropathy. In this experiment we investigate whether HBO has a protective effect on the kidney by preventing metabolic derangement as a consequence of hypoxia in the diabetic kidneys.

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to investigate the protective effect of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBO) in diabetic kidney and thus reverse the metabolic derangement as a consequence of renal hypoxia associated with diabetes. Hyperpolarised [1-13C]pyruvate MRI was used to asses metabolic changes in renal metabolism of pyruvate after HBOT in healthy and diabetic rats.

Materials and methods

Twenty-eight female wistar rats (mean age ten weeks) were included. The rats were randomly assigned into four groups – two diabetes groups and two control groups. Diabetes was induced with an intravenous injection of streptozotocin (STZ; 55 mg/kg body weight; Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, USA) dissolved in a cold citrate buffer (10mmol/L, pH 4.5) in two groups. Blood glucose was measured with a ContourXT blood glucose meter (Bayer Diabetes Care, Copenhagen, Denmark). Rats were included as diabetics if the blood glucose was higher than 15mmol/L 48 hours after induction of diabetes with STZ. One diabetes group and one healthy group were treated with HBO consisted of five daily pressurizations to 2.5 ATA for one hour using pure oxygen. The two control groups (a healthy group and a diabetic group) were kept in the pressure chamber for the same amount of time as the two HBO treated groups, but were kept at normal pressure and atmospheric air. STZ was given 11 days prior to treatment of HBO. Prior to MRI, each rat was anaesthetized with sevoflurane and a catheter was placed in the tail vein for injection of 1.5 mL of [1-13C]pyruvate which were hyperpolarized in a SpinLab (GE Healthcare). MRI was performed on a 3T clinical scanner (GE Healthcare, USA). A dual tuned 1H/13C quadrature volume transmit/receive coil (GE healthcare, USA) was used for 1H/13C excitation/reception. The kidneys were localized by a standard gradient-echo sequence, and a slice covering both kidneys was shimmed automatically. A slice-selective 13C IDEAL spiral sequence was used for hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate imaging acquiring images every 5 s initiated 20 s after the start of injection. flip angle=10º, 11 IDEAL echoes and one initial spectrum per IDEAL encoding, TR/TE/ΔTE=100 ms/0.9 ms/0.9 ms, FOV=80x80 mm2, 5 x 5 mm real resolution and an axial slice thickness of 15 mm covering both kidneys. Temperature, oxygen saturation and respiration frequency were monitored (SA instruments) throughout MRI examinations. Data was transferred to OsiriX (Pixmeo, Geneva, Switzerland) where region of interest (ROI) analysis was performed covering both kidneys.

Results and discussion

Rats were only included in diabetic groups if their blood glucose level exceeded 15mmol/L 48 hours following the STZ injection. A tendency of a reduced blood glucose level during the experiment period was found in the HBO treated diabetic group compared with the untreated diabetic group. The endpoint blood glucose level was significantly different between the untreated diabetic group and the HBO treated diabetic group (figure 1). Our data confirmed an increase in lactate in diabetic rat kidneys1. However, we found no change in the metabolism of either pyruvate-to-lactate/alanine/bicarbonate in the healthy HBO treated group compared with the healthy untreated group were observed. It corresponds to, that HBO is found safe in healthy rats2. A tendency towards a decreasing lactate-to-pyruvate ratio was found with HBO (figure 2).

Conclusion

HBO seems to reduce blood glucose level in diabetic rats. And HBO shows a tendency to decrease the metabolism in the healthy rat kidney and attenuates the derangement of metabolism in the diabetic kidney. More studies are required to confirm the presented hypotheses.

Acknowledgements

The study was supported by Aase og Ejnar Danielsens fond, Direktør Jacob Madsen & Hustru Olga Madsens Fond and AP Møller fonden. A special thank to Henrik Vestergaard Nielsen for his excellent laboratory assistance.

References

1. Laustsen C, Østergaard JA, Lauritzen MH, et al. Assessment of early diabetic renal changes with

hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2013;29(2):125-129.

2. Berkovitch M, Tsadik R, Kozer E, Abu-Kishk I. The effect of hyperbaric oxygen therapy on kidneys in

a rat model. ScientificWorldJournal. 2014;2014:105069.

Figures

Figure 1. Blood glucose level for the two diabetic groups (DM+HBO: diabetic rats treated with HBO; DM+SHAM: diabetic control rats) before and following induction of diabetes and throughout HBO (starting at day 11) until hyperpolarized 13C MRI (on day 18). Values are means ± SEM. *p=0.0151

Figure 2 Ratios for metabolites assessed using hyperpolarized [1-13C]pyruvate MRI for all four groups (HBO: healthy rats treated with HBO; SHAM: Healthy control rats; DM+HBO: diabetic rats treated with HBO; DM+SHAM: diabetic control rats): A) Pyruvate-to-Lactate, B) Pyruvate-to-Alanine, C) Pyruvate-to-Bicarbonate. Values are means ± SEM. + Compared to HBO group p<0.01; ++ Compared to HBO group p<0.05 * Compared to SHAM group p<0.01; ** Compared to SHAM group p<0.05.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
1585