Iris FRIEDLI1, Lindsey Alexandra CROWE1, Sophie DE SEIGNEUX2, and Jean-Paul VALLEE1
1Department of Radiology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland, 2Department of Nephrology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
Synopsis
Diffusion-Weighted
Imaging (DWI) allows the non-invasive assessment of the whole kidney. However,
multi-slice DWI remains challenging because of artifacts, such as motion,
partly related to the multi-slice acquisition. Despite the use of physiological
triggering schemes to limit respiratory artifacts, kidney images can be
impacted by the presence of inhomogeneous signal dropout causing slice-to-slice
signal variation of signal intensity and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC). In
this study, we highlight the presence of signal dropout in DWI and ADC maps, and
present feasibility of a novel motion and signal correction algorithm to provide
robust renal DWI.Introduction
Diffusion-Weighted
Imaging (DWI) has demonstrated its potential in research applications for renal
pathologies
(1,2). Compared to biopsy, DWI is non-invasive and the whole kidney can be
imaged and assessed. However, renal multi-slice DWI acquisition has been considered
too challenging because artifacts, such as motion, partly related to the
multi-slice acquisition, limit the analysis
(3,4). Despite the use of
physiological triggering schemes to limit respiratory artifacts, native kidney
images can be impacted by the presence of signal dropout (local and non-consistent) causing slice
variation. The mean of several slices or one single slice is commonly analyzed
and variability between slices is lacking in the literature. We compared first
the inter-slice variations between a standard fast gradient echo (GRE) and DWI
sequences. Then, an algorithm inspired by a study minimizing bulk motion on
cardiac DWI
(5) was proposed and tested to reduce the variability of Monoexponential Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) in renal multi-slice acquisition.
Methods
Four
healthy volunteers were scanned on a PRISMA
3T MR (Siemens AG) with the spine and abdominal coils. The MR protocol
included a GRE sequence with TR/TE=2000/95ms, resolution 1.4x1.4x5mm, GRAPPA acceleration
factor 2, bandwidth 780Hz/pixel, 30 slices; and three
single-shot SE-EPI DWI with sequence parameters TR/TE=2000/69ms, resolution
2x2x5mm, GRAPPA
acceleration factor 3, bandwidth
2500Hz/pixel, 10 slices, respiratory navigator (PACE, prospective acquisition
correction) and diffusion gradients (3 orthogonal directions, 10 b-values [0-900seconds/mm
2]).
Assessment of GRE and DWI slice variability before
correction:
One Region-Of-Interest (ROI) with both cortex and medulla was drawn on 4
consecutives slices of GRE and DWI. Care was taken to maintain similar
locations over each sequence. In DWI, the ROI was drawn on b
0 images
and propagated through all b-values with manual registration. The mean signal
intensity (SI) of all voxels in the ROI was calculated. The Pearson standard
deviation (PSD) between the SI of the 4 consecutive slices was used to quantify
slice variation. To compare between sequences, GRE and DWI, PSD was expressed
as the percentage of the mean SI.
Motion
correction algorithm: Registration of individual images and correction of
signal dropout were performed with an in-house developed software using MATLAB®. The images of the 3 references acquisitions were registered
for each b-values with gradient images. One acquisition was used as reference
and the 2 others shifted pixel-by-pixel to maximize the gradient image product.
From this, a reconstructed set of images was rebuilt with the pixel provided by
the highest intensity value of the 3 acquisitions.
Assessment of DWI slices variability after correction: PSD of the 3
reference acquisitions was averaged and compared to the PSD of the
reconstructed images for each b-values.
ADC
variability: Quantitative ADC maps were also calculated on a
voxel-by-voxel basis with OsiriX© ADC map plugin and used to compare the
variability in ADC between slices before and after correction.
Results
Uncorrected, DWI images were
impacted by signal dropout causing slices variations. This artifact was reduced
in the corrected DWI compared to the 3 references DWI by the use of correction algorithm
as shown in figure 1. The slice variations were on average 2.7% ± 2.9% in GRE
images, 7% ± 1.2% [range: 2% to 17%] in uncorrected DWI and 4% ±
0.6% in corrected DWI. The signal dropout led to hyperintense area in ADC map
as shown in the Multiplanar
Reconstruction (MPR) of healthy volunteers kidney (Figure 2). Figure 3 represents the PSD
of the uncorrected DWI (in red) with the error
bars for the standard deviation between the 3 acquisitions, compared to the
corrected DWI (in green) and the GRE (in blue) for each volunteer. In 36/40 b-values analyzed, the corrected DWI provided
less variability than uncorrected with a reduced PSD between slices. The
reduction of DWI slices variation led to a reduced slice variation in ADC map
as shown in figure 4.
Discussion and Conclusions
We attempt
to highlight the presence of signal dropout in DWI and ADC maps despite the use
of a respiratory navigator. There is a real advantage in using a motion
correction algorithm to reduce slice variations and improve the quality of
renal DWI. An important factor gained is the reduction of signal dropout
leading to less variability in multi-slice renal DWI. Despite the cost of 3
single-shot EPI acquisitions, this technique can reduce motion-induced artifact
and provide robust renal DWI data for further quantification and detection of
renal abnormality in clinical applications.
Acknowledgements
This
work was supported by grants from the Clinical Research Center of the Medicine
Faculty of Geneva University and Geneva University Hospital, as well as the
Leenaards and Louis-Jeantet foundations and in part by the Centre for Biomedical
Imaging (CIBM) of EPFL, the Swiss National Foundation, University of Geneva and
the University Hospitals of Geneva and Lausanne.References
1.Li Q, Li J, Zhang L, Chen Y, Zhang M, Yan F.
Diffusion-weighted imaging in assessing renal pathology of chronic kidney
disease: A preliminary clinical study. Eur J Radiol 2014;83(5):756-762.
2.Zhao J, Wang ZJ, Liu M, et al. Assessment of renal
fibrosis in chronic kidney disease using diffusion-weighted MRI. Clinical
radiology 2014;69(11):1117-1122.
3.Friston KJ, Williams S, Howard R, Frackowiak RS,
Turner R. Movement-related effects in fMRI time-series. Magn Reson Med
1996;35(3):346-355.
4.Gedamu EL, Gedamu A. Subject movement during
multislice interleaved MR acquisitions: prevalence and potential effect on
MRI-derived brain pathology measurements and multicenter clinical trials of
therapeutics for multiple sclerosis. J Magn Reson Imaging 2012;36(2):332-343.
5.Rapacchi S, Wen H, Viallon M, et al. Low b-value
diffusion-weighted cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: initial results in
humans using an optimal time-window imaging approach. Investigative radiology
2011;46(12):751-758.