Comparison of Perfusion Indices Derived from Intravoxel Incoherent Motion and Arterial Spin Labeling MRI: Results in Native and Transplanted Kidneys
Tao Ren1, Pan-Li Zuo2, Thorsten Feiweier3, Niels Oesingmann4, Andre-de Oliveira3, Li-Hua Chen5, Cheng-Long Wen5, and Wen Shen5

1Radiology, Tianjin Medical University First Center Hospital, Tianjin, China, People's Republic of, 2Beijing, China, People's Republic of, 3Erlangen, Germany, 4New York, NY, United States, 5Tianjin, China, People's Republic of

Synopsis

We collected 20 volunteers and 62 renal allograft recipients who underwent intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) and arterial spin labeling (ASL) MRI. Comparing cortical perfusion indices, ADCfast and PF derived from IVIM with RBF derived from ASL in native and transplanted kidneys. We found that mean cortical RBF exhibited a significant correlation with PF (R =0.50, P <0.05) in the native kidneys, but both with ADCfast (R =0.26, P <0.05) and PF (R =0.32, P <0.05) in renal allografts. ADCfast and PF are effective indices for monitoring renal perfusion, as well as RBF.

Purpose

Microvascular blood flow plays an important role in regulating renal perfusion. Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) and arterial spin labeling (ASL) are two MRI techniques to measure the blood perfusion without contrast injection. The purpose of this study was to compare cortical perfusion indices, pseudo-diffusion coefficient (ADCfast) and perfusion fraction (PF) derived from IVIM with renal blood flow (RBF) derived from ASL in native and transplanted kidneys.

Methods

The study was approved by the local ethics committee, and written informed consent was obtained from all participants. 20 volunteers and 62 renal allograft recipients 2-4 weeks after kidney transplantation underwent IVIM and ASL MRI on a 3T MRI (MAGNETOM Trio, a Tim system, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). IVIM was acquired using a prototype single-shot echo planar imaging (ss-EPI) sequence with 11 b values of 0, 10, 20, 40, 60, 100, 150, 200, 300, 500 and 700 s/mm2 on 3 gradient directions, TE/TR of 72.4/1600 ms, voxel size of 1.8´1.8´5 mm3, and a full bi-exponential fitting was used to calculate true diffusion coefficient (ADCslow), ADCfast, and PF. ASL was performed using a prototype flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery (FAIR) trueFISP sequence with a TI of 1200 ms for perfusion images and a TI of 4000 ms for M0 images with TE/TR of 2.24/4.48 ms, FA of 70 degrees and voxel size of 2.3´2.3´5 mm3. T1 maps were acquired using a modified look-locker inversion-recovery (MOLLI) sequence with corresponding slice parameters to calculate the RBF. The correlation between cortical ADCfast, PF with RBF, and their correlation with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were estimated by Pearson correlation analysis in the native and transplanted kidneys. P <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Color maps of ADCfast, PF and RBF for a native kidney (A) and a transplanted kidney (B) are shown in Figure 1. Mean cortical RBF exhibited a significant correlation with PF (R =0.50, P <0.05), but not with ADCfast in the native kidneys (Figure 2.A). Both ADCfast (R =0.26, P <0.05, Figure 2.B) and PF (R =0.32, P <0.05, Figure 2.C) exhibited a correlation with RBF in renal allografts. Cortical ADCfast, PF and RBF showed a positive correlation with eGFR for recipients (R=0.36, 0.45 and 0.60 respectively, P <0.01 for all).

Discussion

IVIM DWI estimates the tissue perfusion and diffusion at the same time. ADCfast provides a macroscopic description of the incoherent movement of blood in the microvasculature compartment, and PF describes the fraction of incoherent signal that arises from the vascular compartment in each voxel over the total incoherent signal. Theoretically, ADCfast might be considered as a measure of mean transit time, and PF as the flow volume in terms of the classical perfusion parameters [1]. Further experiments indicated that the ADCfast might reflect the true flow better. As shown in this study, PF has a strong correlation with RBF in both native and transplanted kidneys, while ADCfast has a strong correlation with RBF only in transplanted kidneys. ADCfast, PF and RBF all had a significant correlation with eGFR, showing the potential to detect differences in renal function for allografts.

Conclusion

ADCfast and PF derived from IVIM are effective indices for monitoring renal perfusion, as well as RBF derived from ASL.

Acknowledgements

We thank Pan-Li Zuo, Thorsten Feiweier, Niels Oesingmann, and Andre-de Oliveira for their technical assistance and suggestions to improve our manuscript.

References

[1] Le Bihan D, Turner R. The capillary network: a link between IVIM and classical perfusion. Magn Reson Med.1992; 27: 171-178.

Figures

Figure 1. Color maps of ADCfast, PF and RBF for a native kidney(A) and a transplanted kidney (B).

Figure 2. Scatter plots showing the correlation between cortical PF and RBF in native kidneys (A). Both ADCfast (B) and PF (C) exhibited a correlation with RBF in renal allografts.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
1583