Sabrina Klix1, Andreas Pohlmann1, Jan Hentschel1, Karen Arakelyan1,2, Mandy Fechner3, Kathleen Cantow2, Bert Flemming2, Sonia Waiczies1, Erdmann Seeliger2, and Thoralf Niendorf1,4
1Berlin Ultrahigh Field Facility (B.U.F.F.), Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany, 2Institute of Physiology, Charité Universitaetsmedizin, Berlin, Germany, 3Nephrology and Intensive Care Medicine, Campus Virchow-Klinikum and Center for Cardiovascular Research, Charite-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany, 4Experimental and Clinical Research Center, a joint cooperation between the Charité Medical Faculty and the Max Delbrueck Center for Molecular Medicince, Berlin, Germany
Synopsis
Minkowski Functionals (MFs) allow a quantitative analysis
of tissue heterogeneity – independent of absolute values, which can be biased
by magnetic field strength, B0 homogeneity, voxel size, etc. Here we applied
this technique to characterize renal cortical and medullary T2* heterogeneity in
order to test the feasibility of a differentiation between healthy kidneys, and
kidney injuries.Purpose
It is estimated that each year around 2 million people
die of Acute Kidney Injury (AKI)[1,2]. Development of non-invasive MR methods
is essential to diagnose AKI as early as possible. Parametric mapping of renal
T
2* gives access to the blood oxygenation level dependent contrast. We
previously monitored renal T
2* changes continuously during ischemia-reperfusion
(I/R) in rats[3]. Absolute T
2* values are hard to compare due to factors such
as magnetic field strength, B
0 homogeneity, voxel size etc.
Minkowski Functionals (MFs) allow a quantitative analysis
of tissue heterogeneity – independent of absolute signal intensities (if
applied to images) or parameter values (if applied to parametric maps). This
approach was recently used to characterize changes in tumor tissue
heterogeneity on T
2-weighted images, independent of tumor size[4]. The
principles behind MFs are illustrated in Fig.1.
We previously analysed total renal T
2* heterogeneity to
distinguish between healthy, ischemic and reperfused kidneys independent of absolute
T
2*[5]. In this study we developed this approach further to capture
heterogeneity within renal layers, specifically the cortex and outer medulla,
to provide an even more detailed and selective insight into these
pathophysiologically different layers.
Methods
Animal model: Seven anesthetized Lewis rats (male, 2-3 months,
250–300g) underwent renal I/R inside a 9.4T MR system (Bruker Biospin,
Germany)[3]. T2* was monitored with a temporal resolution of ~3min. Ischemia
was induced by closing a remotely-controlled hydraulic occluder around the
renal artery and vein for 45 minutes, subsequent release of the occlusion led
to reperfusion. Interruption and restoration of renal blood flow was confirmed
by time-of-flight MR angiography.
MR imaging:
Experiments were conducted with a birdcage RF resonator
for transmission in conjunction with a four channel receive RF coil array
(Bruker Biospin, Germany) customized for rats. T2-weighted pilot scans and
local B0 shimming that uses a voxel tailored to the kidney were performed
first. For T2* mapping a respiratory-gated multi gradient echo (MGE) sequence
(TR=50ms, number of echoes=10, first TE=1.43ms, echo spacing=2.14ms,
averages=4) was employed with a total acquisition time of ~1min 20sec. A
coronal oblique image slice was acquired (spatial in plane
resolution=(226×445)μm2, slice thickness=1.4mm. T2* maps (Fig.2) were
calculated using MATLAB (The MathWorks, Inc., Natwick, USA).
Layer segmentation model:
An established renal segmentation model[3,6], which defines
three regions of interest (ROIs) within each renal layer based on histological
data and photographs of freshly excised rat kidneys was extended in order to
provide one large ROI for each layer. By connecting the three ROIs within each
layer a large section of cortex and outer medulla could be captured with the
ROIs. T2* maps were manually registered to this segmentation model (Fig.2).
Heterogeneity analysis:
The bias of differences in the absolute T2* was removed
by re-scaling 0.01 to 0.99 percent of the intensities in each ROI to the range[0,1].
The ROIs were then thresholded in 10 steps to create binary images. Minkowski Functionals were calculated for visible pixels using MATLAB[7]; both the total
number of pixels and number of pixels at the edges were counted to yield the
area and perimeter (Fig.1), respectively, as a function of the threshold.
Comparisons between time points were performed by choosing threshold values showing
the largest differences between ischaemia / reperfusion and baseline and
performing a t-test at this threshold.
Results
When Minkowski Functionals were plotted as a function of the
10 grayscale threshold levels, each of the MF had a unique shape for each
dataset (Fig.3). Significant differences were observed in the cortical area
when comparing baseline with ischemia (at threshold level 6, t=1.84, *p=0.049).
No significant differences in cortical area were observed between baseline and
reperfusion (at threshold level 6, t=0.56, **p=0.29).
Within the outer medulla, the area calculated as a
function of grayscale threshold showed significant differences between baseline
and ischaemia (at threshold level 3, t=3.44, *p<0.01). At threshold level 5 a
significant difference was observed between baseline and reperfusion (t=2.41,
**p=0.02).
While the perimeter showed no significant
differences in the cortex, in the outer medulla, however, significant
differences were found between baseline and ischemia (at threshold level 3, t=4.53,
*p<0.01) and between baseline and reperfusion (at threshold level 7, t=3.32,
**p<0.01).
Discussion and Conclusion
Our preliminary results
demonstrate the feasibility and utility of Minkowski Functionals for detecting
changes in renal cortical and medullary T
2* heterogeneity during renal ischemia
and reperfusion. T
2* heterogeneity analysis using MF is thus an encouraging
novel technique for identifying changes in (for making distinctions between)
healthy and injured kidneys. MF analysis holds the potential for implementation
as a diagnostic method in renal pathophysiological scenarios and requires
further investigation, even in other organs and pathologic situations.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Uchino
S et al. (2005) Acute renal
failure in critically ill patients: a multinational, multicenter study. JAMA
294: 813-818.
2. Murugan
R et al.(2011) Acute kidney injury: what's the prognosis? Nat Rev Nephrol
7: 209-217.
3. Pohlmann
A et al. (2013) High temporal
resolution parametric MRI monitoring of the initial ischemia/reperfusion phase
in experimental acute kidney injury. PLoS One 8: e57411.
4. Larkin
TJ et al. (2014) Analysis of image
heterogeneity using 2D Minkowski functionals detects tumor responses to
treatment. Magn Reson Med 71: 402-410.
5. Pohlmann A
et al. (2014) Quantitative
Assessment of Renal T2* Heterogeneity with Minkowski Functionals for the
Detection of Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury. Intl Soc Mag Reson Med.6965
6. Pohlmann
A et al. (2014) Detailing the
relation between renal T2* and renal tissue pO2 using an integrated approach of
parametric magnetic resonance imaging and invasive physiological measurements.
Invest Radiol 49: 547-560.
7. Canuto
HC et al. (2009)
Characterization of image heterogeneity using 2D Minkowski functionals
increases the sensitivity of detection of a targeted MRI contrast agent. Magn
Reson Med 61: 1218-1224.