Nan-Jie Gong1, Hing-Chiu Chang2, Hongjiang Wei1, Mark Sundman1, Nan-kuei Chen1, and Chunlei Liu1
1Brain Imaging and Analysis Center, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States, 2Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China, People's Republic of
Synopsis
We demonstrated the feasibility of using the proposed phase correction
method for increasing the accuracy of QSM reconstruction from multi-band
acquisitions. With multi-band acquisition, we were able to greatly shorten data
acquisition time. It is expected that facilitate this method would benefit
further clinical application of QSM and QSM based cerebral functional and
physiological studies.Introduction
Quantitative susceptibility
mapping (QSM) provides direct measurements of the molecular composition and
cellular architecture of the cerebral tissue (1, 2). Because the oxygenation saturation of blood affects its
magnetic susceptibility, QSM has been recently compared against conventional
magnitude based BOLD fMRI for detecting neuronal function under visual or motor
stimulation (3, 4). It has also been investigated for measuring cerebral
metabolic rate of oxygen and oxygen extraction fraction (5). To date, the most widely used acquisition method for QSM
is gradient echo (GE) imaging. However, its relatively lengthy acquisition time
limits its clinical application in motion-prone situations, investigation of
high frequency functional activities and real-time measurement of cerebral
physiology. Simultaneous multi-band imaging can be used to accelerate QSM based
on 2D GE-EPI, by increasing the sampling rate thus shorten acquisition time.
Here we present preliminary results of a simultaneous multi-band accelerated 2D
EPI acquisition for QSM and a correction method for phase gap between bands.
Methods
Pulse Sequence
In our
preliminary implementation, we acquired a dataset using a 2-band and 2-shot
interleaved EPI sequence with a Nova 32-channel phase array RF coil on a 3T
scanner. Imaging parameters were: in-plane (sagittal plane) matrix size = 128
*128, FOV = 25.6 * 25.6 cm2, thickness = 3 mm, TR = 2 sec, TE = 25
msec. Magnitude and phase images were reconstructed using the generalized MUSE
algorithm to effectively eliminate both in-plane and through-plane aliasing
artifacts (6). Figure 1 shows original phase of multi-band acquisition
without correction.
Phase
Correction
In multi-band
phase, larger number of wraps was identified in band2 as compared to band1 in
axial plane. Discontinuity of phase between band1 and band2 was also observed
in coronal plane. This is very likely resulted from misalignment of k-space
across these two bands, which can be corrected by adding a linear phase term to
band2. Corresponding equation is:
Sband1 = Sband2 × exp[i × (f1 × x+f2 × y+f3)] Equation
1
To eliminate
phase gaps between bands, number of wraps of band2 should be the same as that
of band1 in axial plane. Number of wraps can be represented by sum of phase
gradient along x direction (figure 2(a)), which is denoted as cost function of
number of wraps, costnw. Phase continuity in axial and coronal plane can be reflect
by sum of phase gradient along z direction in the center adjacent two slices,
which are denoted as cost functions of continuity in axial plane (costca,
figure 2(b)) and coronal plane (costcc, figure 2(c)) respectively. Total
cost function can then be written as:
cost= λ × costnw (band1) / costnw (band2)+ costca + costcc
where λ is a weighting factor. In equation 1, f1, f2, f3 can be estimated
using unconstrained nonlinear optimization through minimizing the above total cost
function.
QSM reconstruction
Multi-band phase images
corrected using the proposed method were further processed using 3D Laplacian
phase unwrap, 3D VSHARP background phase removal (7) and STAR dipole inversion (8). As a comparison,
multi-band phase images were further processed using 2D Laplacian phase unwrap
across sagittal plane, followed by 2D VSHARP background phase removal and STAR dipole
inversion (8).
Results and
Discussion
Figure 3 illustrates corrected phase using the proposed method. Phase of
band1 is nearly perfectly aligned with phase of band2 in both axial and coronal
planes. Figure 4 illustrated quantitative susceptibility maps derived from uncorrected
multi-band phase, corrected multi-band phase and 2D processed multi-band phase.
QSM map of uncorrected data showed substantially amplified error caused be phase
gap between the two bands. Significant wave-pattern artifacts can be identified
in the center 4 slices in uncorrected data.
The
proposed method markedly improved the image quality with nearly no artifact observable
in the center slices and meanwhile retained the susceptibility contrast
especially across deep gray matter nuclei and surrounding tissues. Although 2D processing can
overcome phase gap induced artifact in center slices, significantly reduced
susceptibility value and decreased contrast in the deep gray matter regions can
be visualized. Besides, additional artifacts in cortical regions were induced
by incomplete background phase removal.
Conclusion
We demonstrated the feasibility of using the proposed phase correction
method for increasing the accuracy of QSM reconstruction from multi-band
acquisitions. With multi-band acquisition, we were able to greatly shorten data
acquisition time. It is expected that facilitate this method would benefit
further clinical application of QSM and QSM based cerebral functional and
physiological studies.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Liu C. Susceptibility tensor imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2010;63(6):1471-7.
2. Liu C, Li W, Johnson GA, Wu B. High-field (9.4 T) MRI of brain dysmyelination by quantitative mapping of magnetic susceptibility. Neuroimage. 2011;56(3):930-8.
3. Balla DZ, Sanchez-Panchuelo RM, Wharton SJ, et al. Functional quantitative susceptibility mapping (fQSM). Neuroimage. 2014;100:112-24.
4. Bianciardi M, van Gelderen P, Duyn JH. Investigation of BOLD fMRI resonance frequency shifts and quantitative susceptibility changes at 7 T. Hum Brain Mapp. 2014;35(5):2191-205.
5. Fan AP, Govindarajan ST, Kinkel RP, et al. Quantitative oxygen extraction fraction from 7-Tesla MRI phase: reproducibility and application in multiple sclerosis. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2015;35(1):131-9.
6. Chang HC, Gaur P, Chou YH, Chu ML, Chen NK. Interleaved EPI based fMRI improved by multiplexed sensitivity encoding (MUSE) and simultaneous multi-band imaging. PLoS One. 2014;9(12):e116378.
7. Li W, Avram AV, Wu B, Xiao X, Liu C. Integrated Laplacian-based phase unwrapping and background phase removal for quantitative susceptibility mapping. NMR Biomed. 2014;27(2):219-27.
8. Wei H, Dibb R, Zhou Y, et al. Streaking artifact reduction for quantitative susceptibility mapping of sources with large dynamic range. NMR Biomed. 2015;28(10):1294-303.