Simultaneous Multi-Angular Relaxometry of Tissue with Magnetic Resonance Imaging (SMART MRI)
Alexander L Sukstanskii1, Jie Wen1, Anne H Cross2, and Dmitriy A Yablonskiy1

1Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University, Saint Louis, MO, United States, 2Neurology, Washington University, Saint Louis, MO, United States

Synopsis

The cross-relaxation effects between “free” and “bound” water affect the gradient recalled echo (GRE) MRI signal and can bias quantitative measurements of tissue relaxation parameters. Herein we have generalized the classical Ernst equation for the GRE signal dependence on sequence parameters (echo and repetition times, flip angle) by accounting for cross-relaxation effects. The derived equation creates a basis for a new technique - Simultaneous Multi-Angular Relaxometry of Tissue with Magnetic Resonance Imaging (SMART MRI). The technique allows simultaneous quantitative measurements of longitudinal and transverse relaxation rates constants and some essential cross-relaxation parameters without utilizing off-resonance magnetization transfer pulses.

Purpose

Accurate measurement of tissue-specific relaxation parameters is an ultimate goal of quantitative MRI. The cross-relaxation effects between “free” and “bound” water are known to affect MRI signal and can bias quantitative measurements of tissue relaxation parameters in gradient echo1-3 and inversion recovery studies4. The objective of this study is to theoretically account for the cross-relaxation effects in a gradient recalled echo (GRE) experiment and to demonstrate that the new theoretical approach can be used as a basis for a novel technique - Simultaneous Multi-Angular Relaxometry of Tissue with Magnetic Resonance Imaging (SMART MRI). The technique provides naturally co-registered quantitative maps of spin density, longitudinal and transverse relaxation rates along with parameters characterizing magnetization transfer (MT) effects, thus allowing measurements of some MT parameters without exploring off-resonance MT pulses.

Theory and Methods

A system comprising a pool of free water molecules (f-pool) and a pool of water bounded to macromolecules (b-pool) is analyzed in the framework of Bloch-McConnell equation5. Since T2 relaxation time of bound water is very short (~ 10 μsec 6,7), the b-pool does not directly contribute to the measured MR signal. However, the cross-relaxation among the pools between RF excitation pulses substantially affects the free-water MR signal. In the present study, we derive a theoretical expression describing the GRE signal affected by the cross-relaxation effects between the f- and b-pools.

Experimental studies were approved by the local IRB. Experiments were performed using a 3T Trio MRI scanner (Siemens, Erlanger, Germany) equipped with a 32-channel phased-array head coil. High resolution SMART data with a voxel size of 1×1×1 mm3 were acquired using a 3D multi-gradient-echo sequence with TR=18ms, TE1=2.3ms, ΔTE=3.9ms, five flip angles of 5°, 10°, 20°, 40° and 60° with a rectangular RF pulse of 400 μs duration. A navigator-based method was used to correct the physiological artifacts8. GRAPPA9 acquisition with an acceleration factor of two and 24 auto calibrating lines in each phase encoding direction, resulted in the total acquisition time of 17 min 30 sec.

Results

The following analytical expression describing the GRE signal S in the presence of MT effects, as a function of gradient-echo time TE, repetition time TR and flip angle α, has been derived:

$$S(\alpha, TE, TR)=S_{0}\cdot\psi(\alpha, TR)\cdot\exp(-R_2^*\cdot TE)$$

$$\psi(\alpha, TR)=\frac{1-E(TR)-G(\alpha, TR)}{1-E(TR)}\cdot sin\alpha$$

where the amplitude S0 is proportional to the magnetization of the f-pool; R2* describes the transverse relaxation of the f-pool affected by the cross-relaxation effect; the functions E and G (not shown due to space restrictions) depend on the relaxation and cross-relaxation parameters, the volume fraction of the b-pool, and a structure and duration of RF pulses. The above equations can be considered as a generalized Ernst-Anderson expression10, accounting for the cross-relaxation effects with the b-pool. The function ψ can be shown to depend on 3 independent model parameters: R1, kf', and λ:

$$R_{1}=R_1^f+k_f^\prime$$

$$k_f^\prime=k_{f}\cdot(1+k_{b}/R_1^b)^{-1}$$

$$\lambda=R_2^b\cdot(R_1^b+k_{b})$$

where R1f and R1b are the R1-relaxation rate constants in the f- and b-pool, respectively; R2b is the R2-relaxation rate constant in the b-pool; kf and kb are the (fb) and (bf) exchange constants, correspondingly. Importantly, the parameter kf' is proportional to the volume fraction of the f-pool.

Given the pulse sequence parameters, the five model parameters (S0, R2*, R1, kf', and λ) can be found by fitting the model to the measured multi-flip angle, multi-echo GRE signal. The intrinsic R1f - relaxation rate constant in the f-pool can be readily obtained as R1f = R1kf’. Examples of the parameters’ maps obtained from one healthy subject (24 y.o.) and one MS subject (41 y.o.) are shown in Fig.1 and Fig.2, respectively. In Fig.1, all the maps show good white matter (WM) / gray matter (GM) contrast. WM shows higher kf' values, indicating more exchange activity in WM, which usually contains highly myelinated fibers. As only short TEs were used, the R2* map is highly weighted by the fast decaying signal from myelin water. In Fig.2, different maps exhibit different contrasts: lesions are hyperintense on the S0 map and hypointense on R1, R1f, kf' and R2* maps, consistent with a myelin loss. MS lesions exhibit different details on different maps, thus providing a potential for discrimination of MS lesion severity and structure.

Conclusion

Our approach establishes a theoretical basis for a SMART MRI technique that is based on derived theoretical model and multi-flip angle, multi-gradient-echo time MRI experiment. The technique provides quantitative measurements of longitudinal, transverse, and some essential MT parameters without exploring off-resonance MT pulses.

Acknowledgements

No acknowledgement found.

References

1. Pike GB. Pulsed magnetization transfer contrast in gradient echo imaging: a two-pool analytic description of signal response. Magn Reson Med 1996; 36(1):95-103.

2. Ou X, Gochberg DF. MT effects and T1 quantification in single-slice spoiled gradient echo imaging. Magn Reson Med 2008; 59(4):835-845.

3. Gloor M, Scheffler K, Bieri O. Quantitative magnetization transfer imaging using balanced SSFP. Magn Reson Med; 60(3):691-700.

4. Prantner AM, Bretthorst GL, Neil JJ, Garbow JR, Ackerman JJ. Magnetization transfer induced biexponential longitudinal relaxation. Magn Reson Med 2008;60(3):555-563.

5. McConnell HM. Reaction Rates by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance. J Chem Phys 1958;28:430-431.

6. Morrison C, Henkelman RM. A model for magnetization transfer in tissues. Magn Reson Med 1995;33(4):475-482.

7. Horch RA, Gore JC, Does MD. Origins of the ultrashort-T2 1H NMR signals in myelinated nerve: a direct measure of myelin content? Magn Reson Med 2011;66(1):24-31.

8. Wen J, Cross AH, Yablonskiy DA. On the role of physiological fluctuations in quantitative gradient echo MRI: implications for GEPCI, QSM, and SWI. Magn Reson Med 2014; 73(1): 195-203.

9. Griswold MA, Jakob PM, Heidemann RM, et al, Generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA), Magn Reson Med 2002;47(6):1202-1210.

10. Ernst RR, Anderson WA. Application of Fourier transform spectroscopy to magnetic resonance. Rev Sci Instrum 1966; 37:93-102.

Figures

Figure 1. Example of SMART MRI maps from a healthy subject. WM reveals lower spin density and higher relaxation parameters, which is consistent with the presence of highly myelinated fibers.

As only short TEs are used, the R2* map is highly weighted by the fast decaying signal from myelin water.


Figure 2. Example of SMART MRI maps from a MS subject. Increased water content and decreased relaxation are seen in WM lesions.

Different SMART MRI maps show quite different contrast, thus having a potential for discrimination of MS lesion severity and structure, based on multi-parametric assessment.




Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
1530