Model-based Extraction of z-spectrum Asymmetry using SYmmetric basis (EASY)
Hoonjae Lee1,2 and Jaeseok Park3

1Center for Neuroscience Imaging Research (CNIR), Institute for Basic Science (IBS), Suwon, Korea, Republic of, 2Department of Brain and Cognitive Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 3Department of Biomedical Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, Korea, Republic of

Synopsis

CEST MRI is an indirect molecular imaging technique, in which a small molecular signal is amplified by chemical exchange phenomenon. Multiple acquisition of imaging data with varying saturation frequencies, called z-spectrum acquisition, is typically performed, and then subtraction-based MTR asymmetry analysis is employed to investigate the effect of CEST on MRI. However, since the z-spectrum is additionally convoluted by inherent asymmetric MT, NOE, etc, conventional asymmetry analysis is prone to substantial errors. To tackle these problems, in this work we introduce a new, model-based extraction method of the z-spectrum asymmetry using symmetric basis (EASY) to directly characterize the signal sources of the asymmetric z-spectrum.

Purpose

Introducing a new, model-based Extraction of z-spectrum Asymmetry using SYmmetric basis (EASY) that directly characterizes the signal sources of the asymmetric z-spectrum.

Introduction

Chemical exchange saturation transfer (CEST) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) [1,2] is an indirect molecular imaging technique, in which a small molecular signal is amplified by chemical exchange phenomenon. Multiple acquisition of imaging data with varying saturation frequencies, called z-spectrum acquisition, is typically performed [2], and then subtraction-based MTR asymmetry analysis is employed to investigate the effect of CEST on MRI. However, since the z-spectrum is additionally convoluted by inherent asymmetric MT, nuclear Overhauser enhancement (NOE), etc, conventional asymmetry analysis is prone to substantial errors. To tackle these problems, in this work we introduce a new, model-based extraction method of the z-spectrum asymmetry using symmetric basis (EASY) to directly characterize the signal sources of the asymmetric z-spectrum.

Methods

The CEST z-spectrum, if main magnetic field inhomogeneities are corrected, includes symmetric modulation of water signal with respect to the resonance frequency of water due to direct saturation and symmetric MT effects, while pertaining asymmetric properties due to inherently asymmetric MT, NOE, and CEST effects. Given the considerations above, in this work we propose a new, spatiotemporal signal model in the B0-corrected z-spectrum: $$$\mathrm{S = S_{sym} + S_{asym} + N}$$$, where S is a Casorati matrix of the total z-spectrum signal, Ssym is the symmetric component, Sasym is the asymmetric component, and N is additive noise. Nevertheless, the proposed signal decomposition model is highly underdetermined, and both components are possibly inter-related. To tackle these problems, the proposed, z-spectrum decomposition is performed by solving a constrained optimization problem with the following priors: 1) the symmetric z-spectrum can be modelled by a product of spatial coefficients (U) and temporal (V) basis ($$$\mathrm{S_{sym} = UV}$$$), and the temporal basis can be pre-determined using the Bloch simulation based z-spectra by taking only symmetric signal pools into account, 2) the asymmetric z-spectrum has high spatiotemporal correlation ($$$\mathrm{||S_{asym}||_*}$$$), and 3) signal pools, which generate the asymmetric z-spectrum, always result in an additional signal decrease in water (Sasym<0). Thus, the proposed spectrum decomposition problem is written by:

$$\mathrm{\min_{S_{sym}, S_{asym}} ||S – (S_{sym}+S_{asym})||_2^2 + λ_L||S_{asym}||_* \\ \text{ subject to } \quad S_{sym}=UV, S_{asym}<0.}$$

Numerical simulations and experimental studies in creatine-agar phantom and brain were performed on 3T (Siemens Trio) using the proposed method and conventional MTR asymmetry analysis (MTRasym(S,f)= S(-f)/S0 - S(f)/S0) for comparison. S0 is the reference image without CEST preparation. S, Ssym, Sasym, MTRasym(S), and MTRasym(Sasym) were estimated. Furthermore, the proposed, EASY asymmetry analysis was performed in brain by varying the amplitude of CEST saturation pulses. Imaging parameters were described in the caption of the corresponding figures.

Results and Discussion

Figures 2 and 3 represent S, Ssym, Sasym, MTRasym(S), and MTRasym(Sasym) in numerical simulation and creatine-agar phantom, respectively. Conventional MTRasym(S), and MTRasym(Sasym), and Sasym are nearly identical in both simulation and phantom studies except the sign change in Sasym, because CEST is the only asymmetric component in the z-spectrum. However, conventional MTRasym(S) and Sasym in brain exhibit discrepancies possibly due to additional, asymmetric signal contributions from inherent MT and NOE, etc, in which the former cannot differentiate CEST from non-CEST and thus results in mixed asymmetry between them (Fig. 4). Figure 5 demonstrates that Sasym in the proposed EASY method is highly sensitive to varying amplitudes of saturating RF pulses at 3.5 ppm (amide proton pool) and 2.0 ppm (amine proton pool). It is noted that CEST effects increases with rising amplitude of saturating RF pulses.

Conclusion

We successfully demonstrated the feasibility of the proposed, EASY asymmetry analysis in numerical simulation, creatine-agar phantom, and in vivo brain. It is expected that the proposed EASY method enables signal separation of CEST, inherent asymmetric MT, and NOE in the z-spectrum, though its utility in in vivo is to be further investigated in the future.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by IBS-R015-D1 and NRF(National Research Foundation of Korea) Grant funded by the Korean Government (NRF-2013-Global Ph.D. Fellowship Program).

References

1. Ward, K. M., A. H. Aletras, and R. S. Balaban. "A new class of contrast agents for MRI based on proton chemical exchange dependent saturation transfer (CEST)." Journal of magnetic resonance 143.1 (2000): 79-87.

2. Zhou, Jinyuan, et al. "Amide proton transfer (APT) contrast for imaging of brain tumors." Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 50.6 (2003): 1120-1126.

3. Zaiss, Moritz, Benjamin Schmitt, and Peter Bachert. "Quantitative separation of CEST effect from magnetization transfer and spillover effects by Lorentzian-line-fit analysis of z-spectra." Journal of Magnetic Resonance 211.2 (2011): 149-155.

4. Zhao, Xuna, et al. "Quantitative amide proton transfer imaging with reduced interferences from magnetization transfer asymmetry for human brain tumors at 3T." Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (2014).

Figures

Figure 1 Symmetric basis and singular value from simulated z-spectra; PD/T1/T2 of water are 1.0±0.1/4500±450ms/2200±220ms for CSF, 0.8±0.08/1300±130ms/71±7.1ms for GM, and 0.65±0.065/850±85ms/56±5.6ms for WM; PD/T1/T2 of MT pool are 0.02±0.002 of water/1000±150ms/0.2±0.04ms; exchange rate is 40±5Hz; amplitude and duration of saturating RF field are 1±0.5uT and 10s.

Figure 2 Separation results of numerical phantom; PD/T1/T2 of water and APT pool are 1/850ms/56ms and 0.002/1000ms/15ms respectively; exchange rate is 25, 50 and 100Hz; amplitude and duration of saturating RF field are 0.5uT and 10s; B0 inhomogeneity is linearly applied from left to right ranging -1 ppm and 1ppm.

Figure 3 Separation results of creatine-agar phantom; 50mM and 3% agarose are mixed. Imaging parameters of TSE sequence are following; α, 120°; TR, 6000ms; TS, 3000ms; TE, 8.2ms; ESP, 8.2ms; ETL, 32; resolution 1x1x5mm3; average amplitude of saturation RF is 0.7uT and duration and duty cycle are 50ms and 50%.

Figure 4 Separation results of human brain; Imaging parameters of TSE sequence are following; α, 120°; TR, 5000ms; TS, 3000ms; TE, 8.2ms; ESP, 8.2ms; ETL, 64; resolution 1x1x5mm3; average amplitude of saturation RF is 0.5uT and duration and duty cycle are 100ms and 50%.

Figure 5 Analysis of extracted asymmetry of human brain with varying saturating RF amplitude; Imaging parameters are same with in-vivo study (Fig. 4); average amplitude of saturation RF is 0.5uT, 1.0uT, 1.5uT and 2.0uT and duration and duty cycle are 100ms and 50%.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
1516