Yang Li1,2, Deng Mao1,2, Zhiqiang Li3, Michael Schär1, James G. Pipe3, and Hanzhang Lu1
1Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States, 2Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States, 3Imaging Research, Barrow Neurological Institute, Phoenix, AZ, United States
Synopsis
Recent studies have identified a cardiac-pulsation
induced signal modulation in recommended ASL implementation (pseudocontinuous
labeling 1.8s/post-labeling delay 1.8s/background-suppression/3D acquisition).
In pCASL with single-shot readout, the ASL signal fluctuation could be reduced
by cardiac-triggering scheme. Here is this study, we aim to extend the scope
and provide possible solutions to other pCASL settings that suffer from
pulsation effect, such as pCASL with 3D segmented readout, perfusion change detecting
in CBF manipulations (e.g. hypercapnia), and regular pCASL when cardiac-triggering
sequence is not available. We have demonstrated that considerations of cardiac
phase can improve ASL data quality in multiple settings.Purpose
A
long post-labeling delay is recommended in ASL to reduce vascular artifacts
1.
However, recent studies have suggested that vascular artifacts may still be
present at such delay time and, in particular, it manifests as pulsatile signal
fluctuations in regions with large blood vessels. In single-shot settings, its
impact is that voxels near large vessels show considerably greater (e.g. >2
times) signal variations and this could be mitigated by cardiac-triggered
acquisition
2. In the present study, we asked three further
questions. 1) Given that 3D segmented acquisition is the preferred readout scheme
in ASL, what is the impact of vascular pulsation effects in these images? 2)
While ASL is a small signal to start with, it is even more challenging to
detect CBF changes due to manipulations such as hypercapnia. Then, to what
extent could cardiac-triggering improve data quality in these settings? 3) In
imaging centers where cardiac-triggered ASL sequence is not available, is there
any way to reduce the cardiac pulsation effects?
Methods
Fourteen
healthy subjects (26±5yo, 6M) were scanned on a 3T (Philips). We use the ASL
labeling scheme recommended in the white paper1, which includes
pseudocontinuous labeling (labeling duration/post-labeling delay 1.8/1.8s) and
background-suppression. Both regular and cardiac-triggered ASL were performed.
For the cardiac-triggered ASL, a pulse oximeter was attached to the finger of
the subject, yielding R-peaks that serve as a trigger for each TR of the pCASL
sequence.
Study 1: Cardiac-triggering in 3D
segmented pCASL: In this study (N=5), we employ a 3D
segmented spiral TSE acquisition3 in pCASL, with FOV 200×200×120mm3,
voxel size 3×3×4mm3, 22 segments, one pair of control/label. To quantify
the improvement provided by the cardiac-triggered scheme, both regular and
triggered pCASL were repeated 4 times and coefficient-of-variation (CoV) map was
calculated by the ratio between standard deviation of each voxel and whole-brain
signal mean.
Study 2: Cardiac-triggered ASL in
detecting perfusion changes due to hypercapnia:
In this study (N=1), cardiac-triggered pCASL was used to evaluate the perfusion
change between normocapnia (NC) and hypercapnia (HC). The subject inhaled room
air for 3min, followed by HC challenge (5%CO2/21%O2) for
5min (the first 2min allowed the subject to reach new physiological steady
state). Only the first and last 3-min worth of data were used to derive the ASL
images in NC and HC, respectively. Regular pCASL was also conducted with the
same paradigm for comparison. The acquisition parameters are: single-shot 3D
GraSE readout, FOV 180×180×104mm3, 13 slices, voxel size 4.5×4.5mm2,
TR 4.2s.
Study 3: Benefit of recording cardiac
phase even without using it for triggering:
In N=8 subjects, regular (non-triggered) pCASL was performed using readout
schemes described in Study 2. A pulse oximeter was also used but to record
cardiac phase during the scan. A previous study2 showed that both
control/label signal intensities are modulated by cardiac phase with similar
curve shape. We therefore propose that, rather than simply averaging/subtracting,
one can plot the control/label signals as a function of cardiac phase, and fit the
two data group to two identical 2nd-order Fourier series (see Figure
3a for illustration). The gap between the two curves then corresponds to ASL
signal for this particular voxel. 5 repetitions (10 control/label pairs in each
repetition) were conducted to allow CoV calculation.
Results
Figure
1 shows a comparison between regular and triggered 3D segmented pCASL images. With
regular pCASL, the ASL images are contaminated by ring-shaped artifacts (e.g. yellow
arrows). In the triggered data, this was not present. The CoV of the ASL image decreased
significantly (p<0.01) by 22±3%
when considering all subjects.
For
the hypercapnia study, Figure 2 summarizes the ASL images under NC and HC
conditions, their difference, and the CoV image, for both regular and triggered
schemes. While the CBF difference image using the triggered scan appears
similar to that of the regular scan (which is desired as one does not want any
bias in the triggered sequence), the data is more stable with less bright/dark
vascular artifacts, as revealed by 21% smaller CoV.
Figure
3b shows the results using the cardiac-phase-based analysis method, related to
the simple subtraction method. Note that both analyses used regular,
non-triggered ASL data. The only difference is that the fitting method also
utilized the cardiac-phase. It can be seen that, without modifying the pulse
sequence, it was possible to mitigate the signal fluctuations in the traditional
subtraction approach, most apparently in large vessel regions. Over the 8
subjects, the CoV was reduced by 18±5% (p<0.01).
Conclusion
We
have demonstrated that considerations of cardiac phase can improve ASL data
quality in multiple settings.
Acknowledgements
None.References
1. D. Alsop et al., Mag.
Res. Med. 73:102 (2015); 2. Y. Li et al., ISMRM 2961 (2015); 3. Z. Li et al., Mag.
Res. Med. Early
view (2015).