Synopsis
The bolus duration in pulsed
arterial spin labeling (PASL) is typically short, resulting in low SNR. We
propose using multiple inversion pulses to increase the total bolus duration
for improved SNR. In this study, a wedge-shaped inversion was combined with a
regular slab inversion and a QUIPSS II pulse to lengthen the total bolus
duration while keeping the ASL signal quantitative. The preliminary in vivo
results showed an SNR improvement of 54% in gray matter, in good agreement with
theory, compared to a regular PASL scan. The mean GM CBF values were consistent
with PCASL reference scans. This new labeling method should benefit studies
using PASL. Purpose
Pulsed Arterial Spin Labeling (PASL)
1-4 has a short labeling
time and consistently high labeling efficiency. However, the temporal width of the
label bolus (or bolus duration, BD) generated by an inversion pulse is limited
and typically shorter than that in Pseudo-Continuous ASL (PCASL)
5, resulting
in lower signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). In this study, we propose using multiple
inversion modules in PASL (MM-PASL) to increase the total BD for improved SNR and
SNR efficiency.
Methods
In PCASL, a longer bolus can be achieved by increasing the duration of
the labeling. However, in PASL the maximal size of the bolus is limited by the
coverage of the RF coil. In addition, a slightly shorter BD, e.g., 700-800 ms,
is typically chosen to ensure the accuracy of quantification with the QUIPSS II
6 (Q2) technique. As previously shown with the Multi-Module
Velocity-Selective ASL (MM-VSASL) method 7, multiple labeling
modules can be used to lengthen the total BD in a single TR. However, in MM-VSASL
overlapped boluses do not cancel each other as the labeling modules are saturation
pulses. In PASL, though, boluses that are generated by consecutive inversion
pulses may interfere with each other if they overlap due to poorly designed
timing, which may result in suboptimal improvement or even a decrease of total BD
and SNR, and impaired quantitative accuracy. In this study, a wedge-shaped (WS)
inversion 8 and a regular slab inversion with a Q2 pulse are combined
to generate two boluses with known temporal widths. The timing between the two
inversion pulses is matched to the BD generated by the WS inversion, so there
should be no overlapping nor gap between the two boluses. To minimize the interference
of the labeling pulses to the imaging volume, saturation pulses are applied to
the imaging volume before and immediately after the WS inversion pulse, but not
with the second slab inversion pulse.
A healthy young volunteer was scanned in a GE 3T scanner using the
following sequences: 1) regular PASL (PICORE) 3 with Q2: inversion
thickness=15cm, TI1=700ms, TI=2.1s; 2) two-module PASL (WS inversion
+ slab inversion with Q2): the BD of the WS inversion adjusted and estimated 8
as 600ms (Fig. 1), TI1=600ms
for the slab inversion with Q2, TI=2.6s; 3) PCASL, labeling duration=1.2s,
PLD=1.4s. The delays after the tail of the boluses left the labeling region
were matched for all the scans. Other imaging parameters were: FOV=22×22cm, 7
slices, slice thickness=6mm, gap=4mm, TR/TE=3s/6ms, spectral-spatial
excitation, single-shot GRE, spiral readout with matrix size=64×64, 30 pairs of
tag/control images with 2 dummy repetitions, no background suppression.
Theoretical ASL SNR and SNR efficiencies (SNR/√2TR) were simulated
for the above sequences. Labeling efficiencies of 0.98 and 0.85 were assumed
for PASL and PCASL 9, respectively, both in simulation and in in
vivo experiments. A standard ASL signal model 10 was used for CBF
quantification with an assumed T1 of blood of 1.65s 9. A
common gray matter (GM) ROI was generated from the averaged ASL intensity maps
and used in the analysis.
Results
The measured ASL and CBF maps are shown in
Fig. 2. The results from the simulation
and the in vivo experiments were summarized in Table 1. Assuming similar noise levels across these experiments, the ASL signal
should be a suitable indicator of SNR. The in vivo results showed an SNR and an
SNR efficiency improvement of 54% in GM using two inversion modules in PASL,
matched well with that predicted by the simulation, while keeping the
quantification accurate. These results were also consistent with that from the
reference PCASL experiment.
Discussion
As an alternative to the current implementation, two WS inversion
modules can be used. Due to the geometry of the WS inversion, additional
caution is needed to ensure that the interference between the labeling and the
imaging regions is minimized. In principle, multiple (>2) modules can be
used to further increase the total BD and improve the SNR gain while keeping
the measurement quantitative. In the limit, the SNR of MM-PASL approaches that
of PCASL and can even exceed it if the SNR difference due to higher labeling
efficiency outweighs the stronger T
1 decay in MM-PASL. MM-PASL may
be favored in applications such as ultra-high field ASL, where the SAR issue
and possible strong off-resonance effects may be challenging for PCASL, and
applications where the desired duty cycle of imaging acquisition is high.
Conclusion
Multiple inversion modules can be used to increase the total bolus duration
and the SNR of PASL, while keeping ASL signal quantitative.
Acknowledgements
NIH-NS036722.References
1. Edelman RR, Siewert B, Darby DG,
Thangaraj V, Nobre AC, Mesulam MM, Warach S. Qualitative mapping of cerebral
blood flow and functional localization with echo-planar MR imaging and signal
targeting with alternating radio frequency. Radiology 1994;192(2):513-520.
2. Kim
SG. Quantification of relative cerebral blood flow change by flow-sensitive
alternating inversion recovery (FAIR) technique: application to functional
mapping. Magn Reson Med 1995;34(3):293-301.
3. Wong
EC, Buxton RB, Frank LR. Implementation of quantitative perfusion imaging
techniques for functional brain mapping using pulsed arterial spin labeling.
NMR Biomed 1997;10(4-5):237-249.
4. Golay
X, Stuber M, Pruessmann KP, Meier D, Boesiger P. Transfer insensitive labeling
technique (TILT): application to multislice functional perfusion imaging. J
Magn Reson Imaging 1999;9(3):454-461.
5. Dai
WY, Garcia D, de Bazelaire C, Alsop DC. Continuous Flow-Driven Inversion for
Arterial Spin Labeling Using Pulsed Radio Frequency and Gradient Fields. Magn
Reson Med 2008;60(6):1488-1497.
6. Wong
EC, Buxton RB, Frank LR. Quantitative imaging of perfusion using a single
subtraction (QUIPSS and QUIPSS II). Magn Reson Med 1998;39(5):702-708.
7. Guo J,
Wong EC. Increased SNR efficiency in velocity selective arterial spin labeling
using multiple velocity selective saturation modules (mm-VSASL). Magn Reson Med
2015;74(3):694-705.
8. Guo J, Buxton RB, Wong EC.
Wedge-shaped slice-selective adiabatic inversion pulse for controlling temporal
width of bolus in pulsed arterial spin labeling. Magn Reson Med 2015; doi: 10.1002/mrm.25989.
9. Alsop
DC, Detre JA, Golay X, Gunther M, Hendrikse J, Hernandez-Garcia L, Lu H,
Macintosh BJ, Parkes LM, Smits M, van Osch MJ, Wang DJ, Wong EC, Zaharchuk G.
Recommended implementation of arterial spin-labeled perfusion MRI for clinical
applications: A consensus of the ISMRM perfusion study group and the European
consortium for ASL in dementia. Magn Reson Med 2015;73:102-116.
10. Buxton
RB, Frank LR, Wong EC, Siewert B, Warach S, Edelman RR. A general kinetic model
for quantitative perfusion imaging with arterial spin labeling. Magn Reson Med
1998;40:383-396.