Li Zhao1 and David C Alsop1
1Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States
Synopsis
Pseudo continuous arterial spin labeling (pCASL)
studies can be degraded by
magnetic field variations at the labeling plane. We demonstrate through
simulations that high velocity efficiency is particularly vulnerable to field
offsets. By changing labeling parameters from published recommendations and/or
introducing a new RF pulse, the off-resonance sensitivity and peak systolic
velocity sensitivity of pCASL can be reduced. Preliminary experimental
comparisons of parameters are reported.Purpose
Pseudo continuous arterial spin labeling (pCASL)
can provide valuable flow and function information by efficiently labeling flow
in the upstream arteries. Recently consensus recommended parameters for pCASL
labeling have been published based on prior optimizations1. These optimizations have largely focused on
maximizing efficiency for an average vessel velocity on resonance2. In practice, the flow in the major feeding
vessels is highly pulsatile and the pulsatile velocities can vary across time
or subject. Additionally, off-resonance efficiency loss can be a significant
factor. These factors have been considered in simulations for balanced pCASL3, but since this pCASL version is highly
off-resonance sensitive4, correction of off-resonance was emphasized.
Here we present simulations and initial in-vivo data suggesting that robustness
and accuracy of unbalanced pCASL can be substantially improved by changing
labeling parameters and/or pulses from those recommended in the consensus
document. Adjustment of these parameters may reduce not just clear failures,
but also variable efficiency across flow territories, scans, and subjects.
Theory
Optimization
of continuous labeling requires trading off two different sources of
inefficiency: incomplete rotation and T2 related signal loss. These are
expressed by the adiabatic condition.
$$ \gamma B_1>>\frac{G_{ave}V}{B_1}>>\frac{1}{T_2}$$
In
pCASL, the B1 amplitude experienced by flowing spins can be reduced if the
labeling plane is shifted relative to the RF pulse envelope by off-resonance (Figure 1 dash line). This leads to several insights regarding B0 robustness: (1) Higher velocity
spins will suffer disproportionately from off-resonance. (2) The RF pulse excitation
profile should be widened (by decreasing the ratio of the gradient during the
RF pulse to the time averaged gradient) until aliased labeling planes begin to
contribute to inefficiency (Figure 1 orange line). (3) A flatter RF pulse profile may help to reduce
B0 sensitivity (Figure 1 yellow line).
Methods
Flow
driven inversion was simulated with the hard pulse approximation of the Bloch
equations5 using a step size of 4us.
Labeling RF pulses were 500us duration (with several shapes as described below),
followed by a 500us gap. Blood spins originated from 30mm below and stopped at 80mm
above the tagging plane.
Pulsatile
flow was approximated as a maximum peak velocity of 80cm/s at systole and 20cm/s
at diastole, which occupied 80% of the cardiac cycle. Blood flow was assumed to
follow a laminar distribution. Labeling efficiency $$$\alpha$$$ was weighted averaged according to flow
contribution.
To
quantify the performance, the averaged inversion efficiency ($$$Q=-\sum w(v,B_{off})\beta$$$, $$$\beta$$$ is inversion efficiency with -1 for perfect inversion ) was calculated across off-resonance 0-300Hz and velocity
distribution.
A
minimum phase (MP) RF pulse was optimized for flatter excitation profile than the
Hann RF pulse typically employed for pCASL. Simulations were performed both with the Hann
pulse and the MP pulse.
Using the pulsatile velocity distribution, the optimal performance of Hann was searched with fixed SAR, Gave 0.1-2mT/m and the ratio between slice selective gradient of tagging pulse (Gmax) and averaged gradient (Gave) 1-14.
Volunteers were scanned on a 3T GE HDxt scanner.
pCASL was performed with Hann labeling RF and 3D stack-of-spiral FSE readout. Scans
were performed with parameters near those suggested in the consensus document
and with parameters suggested by our optimization. A range of off-resonance was
simulated by including a variable phase increment to the phase shift between labeling
pulses.
Results
and Discussion
Averaged inversion efficiency (Figure 2) suggested different optimal Hann parameters (red square) than consensus recommendation parameters (red circle), when considering velocity and off-resonance.
Simulations of labeling with the consensus recommended parameters confirms that off-resonance sensitivity is much higher for high velocity spins (Figure 3a). By reducing the gradient pulse during the RF pulse to widen the response and lowering the average gradient to increase efficiency at higher velocities, major improvements in high velocity and off-resonance robustness can be achieved (Figure 3b). Simulations using a MP pulse for flatter excitation profile also confirm the theoretical benefit (Figure 3c). Compared to Hann, MP resulted in better off-resonance performance but worse high velocity coverage. The simulated performance of consensus recommended Hann, optimal Hann and Minimum phase RF are shown in Table 1.
Figure 4 the consensus recommended parameters resulted in higher
labeling of the posterior circulation and efficiency variability with frequency
offset. The newly optimized parameters showed more homogenous perfusion signal across
flow territories and frequencies across a wider range of frequencies.
In this work, we improved the labeling efficiency of unbalanced
pCASL at off-resonance and high velocity. Simulations and preliminary data
suggest the proposed parameters are more robust. Further experimental
validation in realistic clinical cohorts is required prior to changing
recommendations.
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by NIH R01 MH080729References
1. Alsop DC,
Detre JA, Golay X, et al. Recommended implementation of arterial spin-labeled
perfusion MRI for clinical applications: A consensus of the ISMRM perfusion
study group and the european consortium for ASL in dementia. Magn. Reson.
Med. 2015;73(1):102-116. doi:10.1002/mrm.25197.
2. Dai W,
Garcia D, de Bazelaire C, Alsop DC. Continuous Flow-Driven Inversion for
Arterial Spin Labeling Using Pulsed Radio Frequency and Gradient Fields. Magn.
Reson. Med. 2008;60(6):1488-1497. doi:10.1002/mrm.21790.
3. Jahanian
H, Noll DC, Hernandez-Garcia L. B0 field inhomogeneity considerations in
pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling (pCASL): effects on tagging efficiency
and correction strategy. NMR Biomed. 2011;24(10):1202-9.
doi:10.1002/nbm.1675.
4. Jung Y,
Wong EC, Liu TT. Multiphase Pseudocontinuous Arterial Spin Labeling (MP-PCASL)
for Robust Quantification of Cerebral Blood Flow. Magn. Reson. Med.
2010;64(3):799-810. doi:10.1002/mrm.22465.
5. Maccotta
L, Detre JA, Alsop DC. The efficiency of adiabatic inversion for perfusion
imaging by arterial spin labeling. NMR Biomed. 1997;10(4-5):216-221.
doi:10.1002/(SICI)1099-1492(199706/08)10:4/5%3C216::AID-NBM468%3E3.0.CO;2-U.