Yi Wang1, Xingfeng Shao1, Steen Moeller2, and Danny JJ Wang1
1Neurology, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, United States, 2Center of Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States
Synopsis
The temporal SNR of simultaneous multi-slice (SMS) 2D EPI ASL has been shown to be
inferior to that of 3D background suppressed GRASE. In this work, we present a
novel simultaneous multi-slab (SMSB) 3D GRASE sequence for volumetric pCASL
imaging with high spatial resolution. The image quality of SMSB-GRASE was
evaluated and compared to a standard 3D GRASE pCASL sequence. Preliminary results
demonstrated the feasibility for whole-brain volumetric perfusion imaging at a
high spatial resolution, although the drop in RF slice profiles in the
overlapped boundary slices still needs to be addressed in future work.Purpose
Simultaneous multi-slice (SMS) imaging has been attempted for arterial
spin labeled (ASL) perfusion MRI in conjunction with either 2D EPI [1] or GRE readout
[2]. It was found that SMS-ASL can
reduce T1 relaxation effect
of the label, improve image coverage and resolution with little penalty in SNR.
However, it has been shown that the
temporal SNR of SMS-EPI ASL is still inferior to that of 3D background
suppressed (BS) GRASE [3]. Moreover, pseudo-continuous ASL (pCASL) with 3D
GRASE can be advantageous for the implementation of BS to further improve the
sensitivity of ASL, as recommended by the ASL white paper [4]. Here we present
a novel simultaneous multi-slab (SMSB) 3D GRASE sequence for volumetric pCASL
imaging with high spatial resolution. The image quality of SMSB-GRASE was
evaluated and compared to a standard 3D GRASE pCASL sequence. Preliminary results
demonstrated the feasibility for whole-brain volumetric perfusion imaging at a
high spatial resolution, although the drop in RF slice profiles in the
overlapped boundary slices still needs to be addressed in future work.
Methods
Figure 1a illustrates the scheme of the presented SMSB
technique, including simultaneously excited 3D slabs (yellow and blue), pCASL
labeling plane (red) and receiver coil array elements (orange) for a SMSB
factor of two. Within each slab, conventional 3D imaging is applied to acquire
multiple slices. Given the minimal
overlap in the coil sensitivity profiles from the two 3D slabs (Fig. 1b), the
aliased slices can be unfolded with a low g-factor penalty. Using a 32-channel head receiver coil, whole-brain
32 axial GRASE images were acquired on a Siemens Prisma system with the
following parameters: two simultaneously excited slabs each has 16 slices, distance
between the center of the two slabs was 48mm, slice oversampling=50%, FOV=290mm2,
voxel size=3x3x3mm3, TR/TE=2940/36ms, BW=2604Hz/Px, segments=3, post
label delay=1s, pCASL label duration=1.5s, labeling offset=90mm, and 20 pairs
of label and control pCASL image volumes were acquired in 6mins. In addition to SMSB GRASE without FOV shift,
a FOV/2 shift along the in-plane phase encoding direction was also implemented
using blipped-CAIPIRINHA [5]. For comparison, standard 3D GRASE pCASL was
performed for the two slabs individually with the same parameters and the
whole-brain imaging took doubled scan time compared to that of SMSB. The aliased slices were then reconstructed
using the slice-GRAPPA algorithm [5] with a kernel size of 3x3. Different from 2D SMS reconstruction, inter-slice
shift also appears along the slice encoding direction in SMSB 3D acquisition,
i.e., an additional term $$$\exp(-i2\pi\cdot{p}\frac{\triangle{z}}{FOV_{z}})$$$ for the k-space signal, where p is the slice index, and ∆Z is
the distance between two simultaneously excited slabs. The performance of SMSB 3D GRASE sequences was
evaluated by quantifying the spatial SNR (sSNR) and temporal SNR (tSNR) of both
control and perfusion images.
Results & Discussion
Whole-brain volumetric pCASL images using the SMSB 3D GRASE
readout with and without a FOV/2 CAIPIRIHNA shift are shown in Fig. 2a and Fig.
2b, respectively. Compare to standard 3D
GRASE (Fig. 3), high-resolution pCASL images with similar image quality were
obtained using the proposed SMSB techniques. Non-blipped SMSB shows more
residual artifact (arrows) due to higher g-factor comparing with the blipped
case. Overall, the two imaging slabs (1st, 2nd rows &
3rd, 4th rows) are clearly distinguishable due to the RF profile
effect for 3D slab excitations, which appear in both standard and SMSB GRASE
images. Moreover, a more severe signal
dropout in the central slices (white box) is observed in SMSB images, see Fig.
2. This finding can be further confirmed
by the slice profile of 3D GRASE signal intensity along slice encoding
direction, as presented in Fig. 4. In
current implementation, although the two slabs were positioned with no gaps in
between, the oversampled slices from one slab did overlap with the imaging
slices from the second slab, and vise versa. This can be improved by
interleaving multiple slabs and/or custom designed RF pulses with improved
profiles in future work. As expected, quantified
temporal and spatial SNR from 3D GRASE control and perfusion images all show a
slight decrease in SMSB implementations, relative to the non-accelerated
results (Table 1).
Conclusion
A novel scheme for achieving 3D
volumetric pCASL imaging with high resolution is presented by simultaneously
exciting multiple 3D GRASE slabs. With
3D imaging within each slab, SMSB can potentially reach much higher spatial
resolution than 2D SMS imaging, while minimizing the blurring effect caused by
the T2 relaxation occurs during the 3D readout. In addition, SMSB 3D
imaging facilitates the implementation of background suppression to further
improve the temporal stability of pCASL.
Acknowledgements
P41 EB 015894References
1. Kim T, Shin W, Zhao T, et al., Whole
brain perfusion measurements using arterial spin labeling with multiband acquisition.
Magn Reson Med 2013;70(5):1653-1661.
2. Wang Y, Moeller S, Li
X, et al., Simultaneous multi-slice turbo-FLASH imaging with CAIPIRINHA for
whole brain distortion-free pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling at 3 and 7
T, NeuroImage 2015;113:279-288.
3. Feinberg
D, Chen L, Beckett A, Arterial spin labeling with simultaneous multi-slice EPI
compared to EPI and 3D GRASE. Proc. of the 22nd annual meeting of
ISMRM 2014, Milan, Italy, p. 716.
4. Alsop DC, Detre JA,
Golay X, et al., Recommended implementation of arterial spin-labeled perfusion
MRI for clinical applications: A consensus of the ISMRM perfusion study group
and the European consortium for ASL in dementia. Magn Reson Med 2015;73:102-116.
5. Setsompop K, Gagoski
BA, Polimeni JR, et al., Blipped-controlled aliasing in parallel imaging for
simultaneous multislice echo planar
imaging with reduced
g-factor penalty. Magn Reson Med 2012;67(5):1210-1224.