Jost Michael Kollmeier1, Volkert Roeloffs1, and Jens Frahm1
1Biomedizinische NMR Forschungs GmbH, Max-Planck-Institut für biophysikalische Chemie, Göttingen, Germany
Synopsis
We present a DCE-MRI
experiment using a commercial perfusion flow phantom for quantitative analysis
of image series with high spatial and high temporal resolution (107 ms). Both
can be obtained by current real-time MRI methods, i.e. radial undersampled
radial FLASH and image reconstruction by nonlinear inversion (NLINV). Contrast
agent bolus tracking with high CNR and quantitative parameter maps are
presented.Purpose
Established DCE-MRI protocols present a tradeoff
between spatial and temporal resolution especially for bolus tracking of
first-pass perfusion procedures. Quantitative analyses require both high
temporal resolution for the rapid arterial input functions (AIF) and high
spatial resolution for monitoring corresponding tissue responses. These
prerequisites are met with recent advances in real-time MRI
1. The aim of
this work is to develop a suitable real-time MRI sequence for quantitative
DCR-MRI using undersampled radial FLASH and image reconstruction by nonlinear
inversion (NLINV) and test its performance with use of a commercial perfusion
phantom.
Methods
Flow Phantom and Injection
Protocol: As a ground truth experiment
a commercial multi-modality DCE Perfusion Flow Phantom (Shelley Medical Imaging
Technologies, London, Ontario Canada) was used driven by a positive
displacement pump to allow for flow of demineralised water. Inside the phantom
inflowing liquids are divided into two outputs. The first is the outlet of a
perforated distribution tube which leaks into a cylindrical compartment whose
output provides the phantom’s response
2. Gd-based contrast agent (Gadovist,
Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, Berlin, Germany) is injected via a clinical
power injector connected by 1/4'' PVC tubing with 6 m tubing length from the injection site to
imaging plane, where a plastic bottle provides a water surrounding for the three tubes
(ID 9.5 mm) connected to the phantom. Pump flow
rate was set to 300 ml/min and the ratio of output to input flow to 1/2. 10 ml
of contrast agent with a concentration of 10 mM of Gd at a rate of 1ml/s was
injected.
Acquisition and Reconstruction: A radial FLASH sequence (TE/TR 1.58/2.55 ms, resolution
1 x 1 x 8 mm
3) acquired two perpendicular sections in an interleaved way, i.e.
parallel to the tubing for saturation of the inflowing spins [Fig.1a)] and
perpendicular for imaging [Fig.1b)]. To achieve high temporal resolution 21
radial views were acquired and reconstructed using NLINV
1 (temporal
resolution of 107 ms). However, the coil sensitivity profiles were kept fixed
(similar to
3) to allow for quantitative analysis of time series. The
influence of the flip angle was investigated for 15°, 20°, and 25°. All experiments were performed at 3 T (MAGNETOM Prisma, Siemens Healthcare,
Erlangen, Germany) using a 18 channel body array coil.
Image Analysis: All images were analyzed using Matlab (Math Works,
Massachusetts, USA). The diameter of the three ROIs were chosen to be 80% of
the diameter of the inner tube. Quantitative perfusion parameters (K
trans
and k
ep) were calculated pixelwise for the normalized signal
intensity using a least-squares fit and the standard Tofts model
4.
Results
Bolus
tracking with high CNR was possible for all three acquisition protocols. Figure
2 shows the normalized ROI signal intensities over time for the 25° flip angle
measurement. Both, AIF (ROI 1) and Phantom Outlet (ROI 2) show the same
enhancement indicating a successful suppression of the inflow effect, because the
flow rates in ROI 1and ROI 2/ROI 3 differ by factor of 2 (300 ml/s vs. 150
ml/s). The measured phantom response (ROI 3) was fitted by the standard Tofts model
(using ROI 1 as AIF). Values for maximum enhancement (Peak Intensity) and area under curve
(AUC) for all data sets are listed in Table 1. All values increase with
increasing flip angle. Figure 3 shows the quantitative parameter maps K
trans
and k
ep obtained by a pixelwise fit.
Discussion
The
deviation in peak intensity and AUC across the ROIs decreases with higher flip
angles. This has probably two reasons: Firstly, the suppression of the inflow
effect is more effective when presaturation with a higher flip angle is
performed, and secondly, linearity between contrast agent concentration and
signal enhancement for T1-weighted images increases when going to higher flip
angles. All phantom responses can be well described by the standard Tofts model,
independent of the chosen flip angle. However, the quantitative analysis is
affected by both, inflow effects and nonlinearity between concentration and
signal enhancement, since all three data sets show an overestimation of the
expected K
trans (0.9 ml/min/g). Future research will focus on a
separation of these effects to obtain a full ground truth experiment for DCE
first pass perfusion with clinical parameter settings.
Conclusion
We
presented a ground truth DCE-MRI experiment for quantitative analysis of image
series with high spatial and high temporal resolution as obtained by current
real-time MRI methods
1. The quantitative analysis for flip
angles over 20° revealed good agreement with expected values rendering this
setup an excellent candidate for future optimization of protocol and
reconstruction parameters.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Uecker, M., Zhang,
S., & Frahm, J. (2010). Nonlinear
inverse reconstruction for real-time MRI of the human heart using undersampled
radial FLASH. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 63(6), 1456-1462.
2. Driscoll, B., Keller, H., & Coolens, C. (2011). Development of a
dynamic flow imaging phantom for dynamic contrast-enhanced CT. Medical
physics, 38(8), 4866-4880.
3. Wang, X.,
Roeloffs, V. B., Merboldt, K. D., Voit, D., Schätz, S., & Frahm, J. (2015).
Single-shot multi-slice T1
mapping at high spatial resolution–Inversion-recovery FLASH with radial undersampling
and iterative reconstruction. Open Medical Imaging Journal, 9,
1-8.
4. Tofts, P. S., Brix, G., Buckley,
D. L., Evelhoch, J. L., Henderson, E., Knopp, M. V., ... & Weisskoff, R. M. (1999). Estimating
kinetic parameters from dynamic contrast-enhanced T 1-weighted MRI of a
diffusable tracer: standardized quantities and symbols. Journal of
Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 10(3), 223-232.