Synopsis
The brain extracellular
space is an irregular and tortuous space among neural cells and capillaries.
Its normal development is important to maintain electrical signal
conduction between cells, material transport and so on, especially in the early
stage after birth, during which angiogenesis is not yet complete. ECS may
provide the main pathway for metabolites. In the present study, gadolinium-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic
acid tracer-based magnetic resonance imaging was employed to realize dynamic
imaging and quantitative analysis of the diffusion and clearance of substances
in the rat brain in vivo. With
this method the differences of diffusion parameters in the young and adult rats
can be detected.Purpose
Gadolinium-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (Gd-DTPA) tracer-based magnetic resonance
imaging (MRI) was employed to realize dynamic imaging and quantitative analysis
of the diffusion of substances in the young and adult rat brain
in vivo.
Materials and Methods
1. Experimental
Animals:
The study was conducted in accordance with the established Chinese
guidelines for the use of experimental animals, and the protocols were approved
by the Ethics Committee of Peking University Health Science Center (Approval
No. LA2012-016). 16 male Sprague Dawley rats were involved in the experiment: adult group ( n = 8) and postnatal 10 days old (P10) group (n = 8).
2. MRI
Pre-Scanning:
Anesthetized rats (50 mg/kg sodium pentobarbital, intraperitoneal)
were placed in a wrist coil for MRI pre-scanning to acquire a reference image. All
rats were scanned in a 3.0-Tesla MRI system (Magnetom Trio; Siemens Medical
Solutions, Erlangen, Germany) using a T1-weighted three-dimensional
magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition gradient echo (T1 3D MP-RAGE)
sequence. Parameters were as follows: echo time 3.7ms, repetition time 1500ms, flip angle 9°, inversion time 900ms, slice thickness 1mm, field of view
267mm, voxel 0.5×0.5× 0.5mm.1
3. Intraparenchymal
Microinjection:
Gd-DTPA (Magnevist; Bayer Schering Pharma AG,
Berlin, Germany) was diluted with double distilled water into 10 mmol/L. The
anesthetized rats were placed in a stereotaxic frame. The skull was opened
using a surgical blade. For the whole brain volume of P10 is approximately equal to 60% of the
adult, 2 µl and 1.2 µl of Gd-DTPA were respectively injected
into the right striatum of adult and P10 rats with a
10µl Hamilton microsyringeµl at a speed of 0.2µl /min for 10 min, followed by a
5 min pause to avoid reflux along the needle track. The stereo coordinates are respectively 1 and 0.3 mm anterior from
bregma, 3.5 and 2.3 mm lateral from median,
5.0 and 4.0mm deep.
4. MRI and
Post-Processing:
MRI scanning was performed at predetermined time intervals
after the intracranial injection of Gd-DTPA. The Statistical Parametric
Mapping
plug-in for MATLAB was used to coregister the MR images from the same rat
pre-and post-injection.2
5. Calculation
of Parameters:
In our previous study, a direct linear relationship between
signal enhancement and Gd-DTPA
concentration was observed under
the same condition1. Then the diffusion parameters within the extracellular
space were calculated3: free diffusion coefficient (D), effective
diffusion coefficient (D*),
tortuosity (λ), and clearance rate constant (k’). The ratio of maximal volume of distribution (Vdmax) was also obtained.4
6. Immunohistochemical Analysis:
The immunofluorescence analysis was performed as previously described.5
Primary antibodies used were
rabbit anti-Tenascin C (TN-C;1:250 dilution; Abcam, Cambridge, UK).
The nuclei were counterstained
with hematoxylin and eosin (HE).
7. Statistical Analysis:
Statistical analysis was performed
by SPSS 19.0. Independent samplet-tests were used to test the
difference of the parameters between the young and mature rats.
Results
1. Comparison of the Gd-DTPA Diffusion Parameters
The signal intensity of the adult (Fig.
1A) and P10 (Fig.1B) rats striatum
increased after the Gd-DTPA tracer was injected into the ECS. The
hyperintensity then attenuated over time with the tracer
distributing and clearence. Detailed datas were shown in Table
1. There were significant differences in the D* ( t
=8.923;p=0.00) and tortuosity (λ=(D/D*)1/2) between the two groups. Besides, a
significant difference was observed in the k' (t
=-4.919;p=0.01). However, the Vdmax showed no significant
difference. Changes in the Gd-DTPA distribution volume in brain over time
were shown in Figure 2.
2. Histological Characteristics and TN-C
Expression
HE histological sections of the adult (Fig.3A) and P10
(Fig.3B) rat brain revealed patch compartments in the striatum.
Immunohistochemistry for TN-C in the adult (Fig.3C) and P10 (Fig.3D) rat
brain revealed more extensive expression of TN-C in P10 rat striatum.
Discussion
The tracer-based MRI technique can not only achieve
the multi-point measurements of diffusion parameters near the injection site,
but also provide a 3-D visualization of the dynamic drainage flow of brain interstitial fluid.
1 Differences in the adult and P10 rat striatum ECS characteristics were observed in the D*, k’ and λ. TN-C is an extracellular matrix
protein that is highly expressed in astroglial precursors in the early stage of life, which is associated with cell attachment and
migration.
6,7 A former study has shown that TN-C-deficient mice have a significantly lower tortuosity.
8
Therefore, we speculate that TN-C may
play a role in the changing of ECS diffusion parameters during development. But
further study is still needed.
Conclusion
With the development of the rat brain, D*, k’ and λ of the striatum ECS has significant differences while
the Vd
max shows no significant
difference, which may be related to the expression quantity of TN-C.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.31271161).References
1. Xu F, Han H, Zhang H, et al.
Quantification of Gd-DTPA concentration in neuroimaging
using T1 3D MP-RAGE
sequence at 3.0 T. Magn Reson Imaging. 2011;29(6): 827-834.
2.Liu
B, Bai
X, Zhou F,et al. Mutual information based three-dimensional registration of rat brain
magnetic resonance imaging time-series. Computers & Electrical Engineering.
2013;39(5):1473–1484.
3. Li K, Han H, Zhu K, et al. Real-time magnetic resonance imaging visualization and quantitative assessmentof diffusion in the cerebral extracellular space of C6 glioma-bearing ratsNeurosci. Lett. 2013;543: 84–89.
4. Zuo
L, Li K , Han H. Comparative Analysis by Magnetic Resonance Imaging of
Extracellular Space Diffusion and Interstitial Fluid Flow in the Rat Striatum
and Thalamus. Appl Magn Reson. 2015;46(4):623-632.
5.Jakovcevski I, Miljkovic D, Schachner M, Andjus PR. Tenascins
and inflammation in disorders of the nervous system. Amino Acids. 2013;44(4):1115-27.
6. Hiroko IK,
Yoichiro A and Masato Y. Aquaporin 4-Dependent Expression of Glial Fibrillary
Acidic Protein and Tenascin-C in Activated Astrocytes in Stab Wound Mouse Brain
and in Primary Culture. Journal of Neuroscience Research.
2015;93:121–129.
7.Lehmenkuhler A, Sykova E,
Svoboda J, Zilles K, Nicholson C. Extracellular space parameters in the rat
neocortex and subcortical white matter during postnatal development determined
by diffusion analysis. Neuroscience. 1993; 55(2): 339-51.
8. Sykova E. Diffusion properties of the brain in health and
disease. Neurochemistry international. 2004; 45(4): 453-66.