Christian Federau1, Soren Christensen1, Zungho Zun2, Sun-Won Park3, Wendy Ni1, Michael Moseley1, and Greg Zaharchuk1
1Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States, 2Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC, United States, 3Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea, Republic of
Synopsis
We assessed the changes in arterial spin labeling
cerebral blood flow (CBF) and arterial transit time (ATT), as well as in
apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), before and after acetazolamide challenge
in preoperative Moyamoya patients as function of the severity of feeding vessel
stenosis. We found a significant increase after acetazolamide challenge in CBF
(mL/min/100g) in territories of normal (50.9±19.0 to 66.8±19.3, p<0.0001)
and mildly stenosed (52.9±18.8 to 66.2±23.4, p < 0.0001) vessels, but not in
severely stenosed/occluded vessels (57.8±31.7 to 58.1±23.4, NS). ATT
significantly decreased but no change in ADC was identified after acetazolamide.Target
Audience
Neurologists,
neuroradiologists, and scientists with an interest in arterial spin labeling
and cerebrovascular disease
Purpose
Moyamoya
disease is characterized by progressive stenosis of the distal internal carotid
arteries and the proximal anterior and middle cerebral arteries1.
The patients are usually young and often suffer multiple strokes. The standard
therapy consists in an external-internal carotid artery bypass operation. The
indication to treat is determined based on the severity of the symptoms, the
occurrence of strokes, and surrogate imaging markers, such as cerebrovascular
reserve (CVR). We assessed the changes in arterial spin labeling (ASL) cerebral
blood flow (CBF) and arterial transit time (ATT) between before and after
acetazolamide (a cerebral vasodilatative agent) in Moyamoya patients as
function of the severity of vessel stenosis. In addition, we studied whether
sub-clinical, “pre-stroke” changes in apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) could
occur under those circumstances.
Methods
Images were
acquired preoperatively in 37 patients (mean age ± standard deviation 38.5±14.8
years old, 25 women) at 3 Tesla on a GE MR750 scanner. A 3D, multi-delay
pseudo-continuous ASL2 and a diffusion-weighted sequence were
acquired before and 15 minutes after acetazolamide injection (1g i.v.). Imaging
parameters for the ASL were: 3D FSE stack-of-spiral read-out with 8
interleaves, TR/TE 6484/23 ms, labeling duration = 2 s, post label delay = 0.7,
1.3, 1.9, 2.5, and 3 s, voxel size = 6x6x5 mm3, NEX = 1, scan time =
3:36 min. Imaging parameters for the diffusion sequence were TR/TE = 5000/87 ms,
bandwidth 1953 Hz, voxel size = 1.9x1.9x5 mm3, b-value = 0 and 1000
s/mm2. All images were co-registered to the MNI brain template4
using MINC5. The severity of the occlusion of anterior, middle, and
posterior cerebral arteries involvement was graded (0 = normal, 1 = mild/moderate,
2 = severe/occluded) in consensus on time of flight MRA images by two
experienced neuroradiologists (Fig. 1A).
20 standardized regions of interests (ROI’s) of two centimeters thickness were
defined on the MNI brain template and corresponded roughly to ASPECTS levels6
(Fig. 1B). ADC, CBF, and ATT was measured
in these ROI’s and evaluated as function of the severity of vessel stenosis. Paired two-tailed Student t-tests were
used to calculate statistical significance. Significance level was set to α < 0.006 (= 0.05/9), using
a Bonferroni correction of 9 to account for multiple testing.
Results
51% of vessels
were normal, 27% mildly/moderately stenosed, and 22% severely
stenosed/occluded. After acetazolamide challenge, a significant increase in CBF
(mL/min/100g) was observed in territories of normal (50.9 ± 19.0 to 66.8 ± 19.3,
p < 0.0001) and mildly/moderately stenosed (52.9 ± 18.8 to 66.2 ± 23.4, p
< 0.0001) vessels, but not in the territories of severely stenosed/occluded
vessels (57.8 ± 31.7 to 58.1 ± 23.4, p = 0.92). In contrast, a significant
decrease in ATT was observed in all territories (Table 1, Fig 2). No significant difference was found in ADC between
pre- and post-acetazolamide injection in any of the groups (Table 1). We found a significant
difference after acetazolamide challenge for ATT between territories of normal
and mildly/moderately stenosed vessels (p = 0.0009), as well as severely
stenosed/occluded vessels (p = 0.005), while interestingly, for CBF we found a
significant difference between territories of normal and severely
stenosed/occluded vessels (p < 0.0001), as well as mildly/moderately
stenosed and severely stenosed/occluded vessels (p = 0.0006). Finally,
independently of the acetazolamide challenge, we found significant ADC increases
in regions with increasing severity of large vessel stenosis (Table 2).
Discussion/Conclusion
This study
demonstrates in a large cohort of Moyamoya patients, that their CVR, as
measured with multi-delay ASL CBF is impaired primarily in the territories with
severe stenoses or occlusions, compared with mild/moderate or no vascular
abnormalities. ATT was significantly longer in regions with either mild/moderate
and severe stenosis/occlusion. A significant
ATT decrease after acetazolamide was seen in all territories, but without any
differences based on feeding vessel status. No ADC changes were seen in any vascular group
following acetazolamide. This supports
the safety of acetazolamide challenge for measuring CVR in patients with
cerebrovascular disease. The increase in ADC with vessel stenosis might be
explained by an increasing number of chronic ischemic lesions in territories
with higher stenosis. Given the growing concerns of chronic gadolinium
deposition in the brain7, ASL offers a robust non-contrast method
for measuring CBF and ATT to evaluate cerebrovascular reserve in Moyamoya
patients.
Acknowledgements
CF is supported by the Swiss National Science Foundation.References
1.
Scott and Smith, NEJM 2009;60(12):1226-1237. 2. Dai et al, MRM
2012;67:1252–1265. 3. Robert et al, Invest Radiol (2015),50(8):473-480. 4.
Fonov et al, NeuroImage 2011;54(1):313-327. 5. http://www.bic.mni.mcgill.ca/ServicesSoftware/MINC. 6. Kim et al, Stroke 2004;35:1340-44. 7.
http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm455386.htm