Sudhanya Chatterjee1, Dattesh D Shanbhag1, Uday Patil1, Venkata Veerendranadh Chebrolu1, and Rakesh Mullick1
1GE Global Research, Bangalore, India
Synopsis
In acute ischemic stroke (AIS), stroke volume is determined by DWI and
volume at risk is identified by thresholding deconvolved Tmax map (> 6s).
Tmax map is itself influenced by quality of AIF, its location, laterality and
deconvolution algorithm. This can potentially impact estimation of "volume
at risk”. In this work, we describe a CAMNS based source separation
method with DSC concentration data to identify perfusion
patterns without explicit parametrization of PWI data. We
demonstrate that "volume at risk" estimation derived with CWSE may
overcome the variability associated with the current methods based on Tmax
maps only.Purpose
In
acute ischemic stroke (AIS), diffusion (DWI) - perfusion MRI (DSC-MRI) are used
to identify core and hypo-perfused areas [1]. With DSC-MRI, "tissue at risk" is typically identified by thresholding Tmax map [1].
Computation of Tmax map can be influenced by quality of AIF, its location, laterality and the deconvolution
algorithm used [2, 3]. Consequently, this variability in Tmax will impact estimation of “volume at risk”.
An approach to assess perfusion in AIS without explicit
parametrization of DSC data is desirable. Source separation methods can
potentially identify patterns from dynamic data[4, 5, 6]. We describe
a method to
identify perfusion
patterns from DSC-MRI using Convex Analysis of Mixtures of Nonnegative
Sources (CAMNS) based source separation [7] and weight estimation approach
(CSWE) [6, 8].
We demonstrate that, CSWE can estimate
reproducible, non-negative and physiologically plausible perfusion patterns from DSC data. The work indicates that "volume at risk" estimation derived with CWSE may overcome the variability associated with the current methods based on Tmax maps only.
Methods
Patient database: MRI data from ten AIS
patients acquired with IRB approval. Imaging: Performed on 3T (N =8) /1.5T (N=2) GE Signa HDx MRI scanners
using 8-channel head coil. DWI
imaging: Axial DWI trace images, SE-EPI, b = 0 s/mm2 and
1000 s/mm2. PWI
Imaging: Axial oblique slices, GE-EPI, 240 mm FOV, 128x128 matrix and, 3T:
TE/TR = 19/1000 ms, 100 bolus phases, TH = 7 mm, 1.5T: TE/TR = 60/2000 ms,
25 bolus phases, TH = 6 mm. PWI Map
Generation: DSC images were
processed using BrainStat-AIF tool (Advantage Workstation, GEHC) to generate deconvolved
Tmax and MTT maps. DSC images were also processed using in-house software to
convert DSC signal data into gadolinium concentration units. Brain mask was segmented on first
non-saturated bolus phase. CSWE methodology: CAMNS
algorithm identifies underlying non-negative sources of concentration data within
brain mask. We hypothesized three components (p =3): normal
brain, delayed, low-perfusion and noise/core infarct . Post
CAMNS, a constrained optimization is solved to calculate weights corresponding
to sources as [7]: If data is $$$ X \varepsilon \Re^ {m x n} $$$ , (m = bolus phases, n = no. of voxels) and p-sources $$$ s \varepsilon \Re^{m x p} $$$, weights w calculated by solving $$$ \min_{w} \left \| X-ws \right \| $$$ such that w $$$ \geqslant 0 $$$.
Hypoperfused area delineation: In first pass (FP-CSWE), normal brain region source component was manually identified and its spatial weight data thresholded (< 0.5) to identify voxels which underwent second pass of CSWE (SP-CSWE). SP-CSWE sources and weight matrix were correlated to identify regions which corresponded to elevated Tmax regions. The SP-CSWE – Tmax correlation was performed by a trained radiologist who reviewed DWI, Tmax, MTT and SP-CSWE weight map data and identified SP-CSWE weight map corresponding to Tmax map characteristics. Next, SP-CSWE weight map corresponding to Tmax map was thresholded (> 0.95), ventricle regions (if any) removed by the radiologist and a binary mask generated.
Results and Discussion
Figures 1-5 demonstrate the efficacy of
proposed CSWE method in identifying abnormal perfusion regions in AIS. In all
cases, radiologist could correlate at-least one weight matrix component with
elevated Tmax regions. We also investigated if certain trends are visible in
the shapes of sources. One common trend was that normal region source had least
offset from baseline; post the peak and re-circulation cut-off, while in case
of elevated Tmax regions, the source had a significant offset and/or no “washout” of contrast (Fig. 2). For patient #5 (Figure, 5),
Tmax map showed elevated values only around regions of DWI lesion in right PCA distribution, while
CSWE data indicated that whole of right hemisphere and left PCA distribution being compromised. Review of MTT map by radiologist (Figure
5) confirmed this was reasonable; demonstrating the robustness of
CSWE methodology. The only false positive in the correlated SP-CSWE
binary mask was contribution from ventricles, which had to be manually removed.
However with availability of DWI data (inherent suppression of ventricles
in DWI) in AIS, this can be easily resolved by registration of DSC-MRI to DWI.
In all cases (except one, fig 5), the SP-CSWE binary mask had mean Tmax values
> 6s, similar to that observed in literature for AIS lesions [1].
The follow-up to this work would be to
correlate the patterns with the final infarct outcome to confirm the robustness.
Conclusion
In AIS
setting, CSWE methodology with DSC concentration data can reliably identify
regions of impaired perfusion similar to that observed using parametric Tmax
map.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1].
Wheeler HM , Stroke. 2013 Mar;44(3):681-5.
[2].
Calamante F et.al, Stroke 2002; 33: 1146–1151.,
[3].
Kudo K et.al, J Cereb Blood Flow Metab.
2011 Mar;31(3):908-12
[4].
Suzuki K et al, J Neuroimaging. 2011,
21(4):384-94.
[5].
Li Chen, IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, VOL. 30, NO. 12, 2011
[6].
Wu Y et.al, Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism (2007) 27, 632–645
[7].
Chan AH, IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING, VOL. 56, NO. 10, PART 2, PP.
5120-5134, OCT. 2008
[8].
Palomar, Daniel P., and Yonina C. Eldar. , Convex optimization in signal
processing and communications. Cambridge university press, 2010