Synopsis
The acetazolamide challenge can be used to assess cerebrovascular
reserve and oxygenation in patients with steno-occlusive diseases such Moyamoya,
thus enabling evaluation of the quantitative blood oxygen-level dependent
(qBOLD) approach of modeling tissue oxygenation. In this study, we mapped post-acetazolamide
oxygenation (with transverse relaxation rate R2’), CBF with arterial spin
labeling (ASL), and CBV with dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC). We found that angiographically abnormal
tissues are relatively hypoperfused and hypoxic. Finally, we investigated a qBOLD biophysical
model for quantitative tissue oxygenation which suggested no difference in the
cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen consumption (CMRO2) between normal and
affected regions.Purpose
Acetazolamide (ACZ) injection is a robust clinical
perfusion challenge for assessing cerebrovascular reserve
1. For steno-occlusive pathologies such as
Moyamoya disease, oxygenation mapping may provide additional dialogistic information
2.
In this study, we perform R
2’ relaxometry for oxygenation mapping, multi-delay
ASL for measuring cerebral blood flow (CBF), and dynamic susceptibility
contrast (DSC) for measuring cerebral blood volume (CBV) after ACZ injection in
a cohort of pre-operative Moyamoya disease patients. We also compare our findings with a quantitative
BOLD (qBOLD) oxygenation model
3
to estimate the cerebral metabolic rate of
oxygen consumption (CMRO
2) in both affected and non-affected tissues.
Methods
19 Moyamoya disease patients (ages 39±12 y, 14
F) were scanned with informed consent and IRB approval, at 3.0T (MR750W, GE-Healthcare) with ACZ injection (1g IV). Post-ACZ
R2’ mapping was performed using GESFIDE4 (TESE/TR 100/2000ms, TE 5-130ms,
40 echoes, resolution 1.9×1.9×1.5mm3, 14 slices). Post-ACZ perfusion
was mapped with two sequences: a) multi-delay pseudo-continuous ASL5 (TR/TE 6518/25.1ms,
label time 2000ms, 5 equally spaced PLDs 700-3000ms, resolution 3.4×3.4×4mm3, 36 axial slices), offering improved quantitation in areas of
slow collateral flow; b) DSC imaging (TR/TE 1800/40ms, resolution 1.9×1.9×5.0mm3
with 20 slices) using 0.1mmol/kg of gadolinium contrast (Multihance, Bracco). Whole-brain T1-weighted 3D IR-FSPGR and TOF
MRA of the Circle of Willis were performed.
GESFIDE images were analyzed in native space, with R2’ maps
calculated using mono-exponential fitting4. CBF maps were calculated from ASL images6, while DSC images
were processed7
using commercial software (RAPID, iSchemaView) before combined ASL-DSC (CAD)
correction8
was applied for absolute CBV quantitation. Using a multiparametric qBOLD approach9 with arterial/venous
blood volume ratio 30/70 10, we created tissue oxygen saturation (StO2) and
CMRO2 maps. Data was analyzed using 3cm annular, mixed-cortical ROIs approximating
major arterial territories, with 6 radial segments at two standard 14mm-thick levels. Each ROI was classified “normal” or
“abnormal” by blinded inspection of TOF MRA images and axial projection by an
experienced neuroradiologist. Comparisons
were performed using the 2-tailed t-test with α=0.05.
Results
The results from group-level analysis (N=228) are
shown in Table 1. Post-ACZ R2’ and CBF significantly differed
between normal and abnormal ROIs (respectively, 16±31% higher and 13±45% lower in abnormal ROIs),
while CBV did not (p=0.18).
Evaluating all regions, R2’ significantly decreased with increased
perfusion metrics, consistent with better oxygenation in regions with better
perfusion (Fig. 2-3): (normal) R2’=-0.027*CBV +3.23, R2=0.06,
p<0.001; and (abnormal) R2’=-0.015*CBF
+3.94, R2=0.19, p<0.001.
The slopes of regression lines were not significantly different between
normal and abnormal data, while the intercepts were.
Finally, we calculated post-ACZ StO
2 to be mostly over 99%
and significantly (p<0.05) lower in abnormal ROIs, though only by a small
amount. Post-ACZ CMRO
2 did not
differ between normal and abnormal regions.
Discussion
Our study found that post-ACZ CBF, measured via
multi-delay ASL, discriminated between angiographically normal and abnormal regions. Since diseased
tissues experience chronic vasodilation at baseline and have limited ability to
further vasodilate, it is reasonable that no differences in post-ACZ CBV were observed.
R2’ imaging showed that the amount of deoxyhemoglobin also
differed in normal and abnormal tissues.
According to the qBOLD biophysical model presented by Yablonskiy and
Haacke3: $$$R_2 \propto Hct\cdot DBV \cdot (1-StO_2)$$$,
where Hct is capillary hematocrit, DBV is deoxygenated blood volume and StO2 is
tissue oxygen saturation, we conclude that StO2 is lower in abnormal regions,
consistent with our expectation that some of them experience chronic
under-oxygenation. However, the weak
correlation (Fig. 2)
suggests that Hct and/or post-ACZ StO2 were not sufficiently constant across data
points, and/or CBV was not proportional to DBV.
The significant offset indicates sources of R2’ other than oxygenation,
some of which
have previously been discussed in literature4.
Finally, the StO
2 values calculated from the multiparametric
qBOLD approach were
significantly higher compared to literature
11, though StO
2 was lower in affected regions, some of which are expected to be
under-oxygenated. The source of
the high StO
2 values appears to be the very high CBV values measured (Table 1). CMRO
2 in angiographically normal regions was
comparable to measurements obtained via positron emission tomography
12. The lack of significant difference between
normal and abnormal regions may indicate that most patients in our study are not
at late stage of Moyamoya disease where tissue metabolism is reduced.
Conclusion
In this study, we imaged post-ACZ perfusion in Moyamoya
disease patients using multi-delay ASL and DSC.
We also imaged R
2’ for oxygenation quantitation with qBOLD methods.
Our data agreed with our expectation that angiographically abnormal
tissues are under-oxygenated and less well-perfused during a perfusion
challenge, but quantitation
of StO
2 requires needs
further evaluation.
Acknowledgements
NIH R01NS066506, R01NS047607, R21NS087491, NCRR 5P41RR09784. GE Healthcare.References
1. AS Vagal et al.,
Am J Neuroradiol, 2009.
2. W Powers, Ann Neurol, 1991.
3. DA Yablonskiy & EM Haacke, Mag Reson Med, 1994.
4. W Ni et al.,
Mag Reson Med, 2015.
5. R Wang et al.,
Eur Radiol, 2014.
6. W Dai et al.,
Mag Reson Med, 2012.
7. M Straka et al.,
J Mag Reson Imag, 2010.
8. G Zaharchuk et al.,
Mag Reson Med, 2010.
9. T Christen et al.,
Mag Reson Med, 2012.
10. D Bulte et al.,
Proc ISMRM, 2015.
11. V Faoro et al.,
J Appl Physiol, 2007.
12. H Okazawa et al.,
JCBFM, 2001.