Vadim Zotev1, Raquel Phillips1, Masaya Misaki1, Ahmad Mayeli1,2, and Jerzy Bodurka1,3
1Laureate Institute for Brain Research, Tulsa, OK, United States, 2Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Tulsa, OK, United States, 3College of Engineering, University of Oklahoma, Tulsa, OK, United States
Synopsis
We have performed an exploratory study of emotion self-regulation
training in major depressive disorder (MDD) patients using simultaneous real-time
fMRI and EEG neurofeedback (rtfMRI-EEG-nf). MDD patients learned to upregulate two
fMRI and two EEG target measures, relevant to MDD, using rtfMRI-EEG-nf during a
happy emotion induction task. The target
measures included fMRI activities of the left amygdala and left rACC, as well
as frontal EEG asymmetries in the alpha and high-beta bands. Our results
demonstrate that MDD patients can learn to successfully upregulate all four measures
simultaneously. These findings may lead to development of more efficient
neurotherapies for MDD.Purpose
Simultaneous multimodal real-time fMRI and EEG neurofeedback
(rtfMRI-EEG-nf)
1 is an emerging technique that allows simultaneous modulation
of both electrophysiological (EEG) and hemodynamic (BOLD) brain activity. Here
we report the first application of rtfMRI-EEG-nf for emotion self-regulation
training in MDD patients. In this exploratory study, MDD patients used
rtfMRI-EEG-nf during a happy emotion induction task to simultaneously upregulate
four target measures: BOLD activity of the left amygdala, BOLD activity of the
left rACC, frontal EEG asymmetry (FEA) in the alpha band [7.5...12.5] Hz, and frontal
EEG asymmetry in the high-beta (beta3) band [21...30] Hz. These activity measures are relevant to emotion
regulation in general and to MDD in particular
2-9. We explore the
feasibility of their simultaneous modulation with the purpose of enhancing emotion regulation training in MDD
patients.
Methods
Three unmedicated MDD patients (two
females) participated in the study (ongoing). The
experiments were performed on a GE
Discovery MR750
3T MRI scanner with an 8-channel receive-only head coil. A single-shot gradient echo EPI sequence with FOV/slice=240/2.9
mm, TR/TE=2000/30 ms, SENSE
R=2,
image matrix 96×96, flip=90°, 34 axial slices, was employed for fMRI. Simultaneous EEG recordings were performed using a 32-channel MR-compatible EEG system (Brain Products GmbH) in 0.016−250 Hz band with 0.1 µV resolution and 5 kS/s sampling,
relative to FCz reference.
The
rtfMRI-EEG-nf was implemented using a custom multimodal real-time
system1 with a
neurofeedback GUI (Fig. 1A). The
two rtfMRI-nf signals (red, orange bars in Fig. 1A) were based, respectively, on fMRI activations in the left amygdala ROI and the left rACC ROI (Fig. 1B).
The ROIs were defined as 14-mm-diameter spheres centered at (−21,−5,−16) and (−3,34,5)6,7, and transformed to the individual EPI space. The heights of the two
rtfMRI-nf bars were updated every 2 s.
The two EEG-nf signals (purple, magenta
bars in Fig. 1A) were based, respectively, on frontal EEG asymmetry changes (×10)
in the high-beta and alpha EEG bands1,9 for the F3 and F4 channels (Fig. 1D).
Real-time alpha asymmetry was defined as Aa = (P(F4)−P(F3))/(P(F4)+P(F3)), where P is EEG
power in the alpha band. Real-time high-beta asymmetry was defined as Ab = (P(F3)−P(F4))/(P(F3)+P(F4)), where P is EEG power in the high-beta band. The EEG power was computed in
real time with 0.488 Hz spectral resolution using FFT for moving 2.048 s time
window with 4 ms sampling. The heights of the two EEG-nf bars were updated
every 2 s.
The
rtfMRI-EEG-nf experimental protocol (Fig. 1C)
included six runs, and each run (except Rest) consisted of 40-s blocks of Rest, Happy Memories, and Count conditions6-9. For each
Happy Memories condition, the participant
was asked
to feel happy by evoking happy autobiographical memories, while trying to raise the levels of all four nf bars on the screen to the fixed target level (horizontal
line in Fig. 1A). The target level was raised incrementally from run to run1. Baseline fMRI and EEG asymmetry levels were computed by averaging data for
the Rest condition block preceding a current Happy Memories condition block. No
nf bars were shown during the Rest and Count conditions, and during the entire
Transfer run.
Real-time
removal of EEG-fMRI artifacts was implemented in BrainVision RecView software
(see diagram in Fig. 1E). It employed four real-time reference artifact
waveforms acquired using a modified MR-compatible EEG cap (Fig. 1F). The cap
included four wire contours (with 50k resistors), and four acquisition channels
were used to record the reference waveforms. Subtraction of the GLM fitted
reference signals was performed in the RecView after the average artifact
subtraction (AAS) for the MR artifacts and prior to the AAS for the
cardioballistic (CB) artifacts. The real-time CB and motion artifact regression
(Fig. 1E) reduced artifact-dominated signal variance for F3 and F4 typically by
4...6 dB before the CB AAS.
Offline fMRI data analysis was performed in AFNI10. Offline EEG
analysis was performed in BrainVision Analyzer 2. EEG time-frequency analysis
was used to compute EEG power with 8 ms temporal and 0.5 Hz frequency
resolution. Normalized FEA for the alpha band was defined as FEAa = ln(P(F4))−ln(P(F3)). Normalized FEA for the high-beta band was defined as FEAb = ln(P(F3))−ln(P(F4)).
Results
Fig. 2 shows experimental results for the group
of three MDD patients. When averaged across the four rtfMRI-EEG-nf
runs, the results indicate a successful upregulation of all four target measures. Our EEG data analysis shows efficiency of the real-time EEG-fMRI artifact removal procedure.
Conclusion
Our pilot results demonstrate the feasibility of
emotion regulation training in MDD patients using the rtfMRI-EEG-nf with two
fMRI and two EEG target measures relevant to MDD.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Zotev V, et al. Self-regulation of human brain activity using simultaneous real-time fMRI and EEG neurofeedback. NeuroImage 2014; 85:985.
2. Price JL, Drevets WC. Neurocircuitry of mood disorders. Neuropsychopharmacology 2010; 35:192.
3. Pizzagalli DA. Frontocingulate dysfunction in depression: toward biomarkers of treatment response. Neuropsychopharmacology 2011; 36:183.
4. Thibodeau R, et al. Depression, anxiety, and resting frontal EEG asymmetry: a meta-analytic review. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 2006; 115:715.
5. Pizzagalli DA, et al. Brain electrical tomography in depression: the importance of symptom severity, anxiety, and melancholic features. Biol. Psychiatry 2002; 52:73.
6. Zotev V, et al. Self-regulation of amygdala activation using real-time fMRI neurofeedback. PLoS ONE 2011; 6:e24522.
7. Zotev V, et al. Prefrontal control of the amygdala during real-time fMRI neurofeedback training of emotion regulation. PLoS ONE 2013; 8:e79184.
8. Young KD, et al. Real-time fMRI neurofeedback training of amigdala activity in patients with major depressive disorder. PLoS ONE 2014; 9:e88785.
9. Zotev V, et al. Correlation between amygdala BOLD activity and frontal EEG asymmetry during real-time fMRI neurofeedback training in patients with depression. ArXiv:1409.2046v2.
10. Cox RW. AFNI: software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Comput. Biomed. Res. 1996; 29:162.