Olga Tymofiyeva1, Colm G Connolly1, Tiffany C Ho1, Matthew D Sacchet2, Eva Henje Blom1,3, Kaja Z LeWinn1, Duan Xu1, and Tony T Yang1
1UCSF, San Francisco, CA, United States, 2Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States, 3Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
Synopsis
The
goal of this study was to perform
DTI-based connectome analysis in a cohort of depressed adolescents and matched non-depressed
controls. Our
findings highlight the role of right caudate connectivity, in particular to frontal
gyri, insula, and anterior cingulate, in this population.INTRODUCTION
According to the World
Health Organization (WHO), major depressive disorder (MDD) is the current
leading cause of disability worldwide and adolescence is a vulnerable period
for onset of depression, affecting more than 10% of adolescents in the US [1]. Uncovering
the neuroanatomical basis of MDD is essential for the development of novel
effective treatment paradigms. It is likely that differences between a depressed
and non-depressed adolescent brain are not confined to a specific brain region
but involve communication pathways between different regions. MRI connectomics views
the brain as a network and has been successfully applied to studying
brain network development [2] and disruption in neurological and
psychiatric disorders [3].
The goal of
this study was to perform DTI-based connectome analysis in a cohort of
depressed adolescents and matched non-depressed controls.
METHODS
T1-weighted
and DTI data were obtained on 57 adolescents with MDD and 41 well-matched
controls. T1-weighted image parameters: 3T, fast spoiled gradient echo,
TR/TE=8.1/3.17 ms, flip angle=12°, 256x256, 1x1x1mm voxels. The images
were bias-field-corrected, skull-stripped, and transformed to MNI152 space
using an affine transform. DTI parameters: dual spin echo EPI, 30
directions, b-value=1500 s/mm
2, TR/TE=7200/86.5ms, 96x96,
1.875x1.875x2.5mm voxels. A quality assurance step was performed as previously
described [4]. Individual brains were segmented into 90 ROIs using Automated Anatomical
Labeling (AAL) atlas [5], which were dilated by 1 voxel and
used as network nodes. DTI
reconstruction and deterministic whole-brain streamline fiber tractography were
performed using the Diffusion Toolkit [6]. Connections between AAL ROIs were
calculated, with the number of connecting streamlines
(scaled by total brain volume) and average FA serving as edge weights. Weighted local and global network
properties normalized by random networks were examined using the Brain Connectivity Toolbox [7]. Network-Based Statistic (NBS) [8]
was
utilized to assess edge-wise differences in the connectivity matrices between
the two groups. We performed a t-test with 5000 permutations and tested a range
of primary thresholds 3, 3.1, … 6 to determine the highest threshold
value at which the number of significantly different connections plateaued.
RESULTS
While
there were no significant group differences in the global network properties, the
local measure of node strength of the right caudate weighted by FA was significantly
lower in the depressed subjects
(p<0.01, corrected for multiple comparisons). Edge-based FA-weighted
connectome analysis using NBS at primary threshold 5.5 (resulting in p-value=0.0000)
revealed a right caudate-centered network comprising 13 nodes and 12
connections with lower FA in MDD (Figs. 1,2). In particular, connections
between right caudate and frontal gyri (superior, medial, and inferior), between
right caudate and insula, and between right caudate and anterior cingulate had
significantly lower FA in adolescents with MDD. Age was positively associated with the FA-based node
strength of the right caudate (Fig. 3). Reynolds Adolescent Depression Scale (RADS-2) scores in MDD subjects didn’t
show any significant correlation with the right caudate node strength. There
was no significant gender difference in the right caudate node strength. There were also no
significant differences in global mean FA or caudate volume between groups.
DISCUSSION
This
is the first report of DTI-based connectome analysis of adolescent MDD and our
findings highlight the role of right caudate connectivity, in particular to frontal
gyri, insula, and anterior cingulate, in this population. Our findings are
similar to the results of a recent DTI-based NBS study of adult MDD, in which two
networks with lower connectivity were identified in the depressed group, also
including right caudate, frontal gyri, and anterior cingulate [9]. Caudate is
part of the striatum, and a critical component of the reward system. Altered
reward function has been previously found in adolescent depression
using fMRI studies [10], with a pattern of low striatal response and high
medial prefrontal response to reward, potentially due to disrupted balance of
corticostriatal circuit function. In the AAL atlas the caudate includes the Nucleus
accumbens (NAcc), which is thought to act as a motivation gateway between
systems involved in emotion and motor control. Interestingly, the NAcc has previously
been identified as a key center of the adult depression network and has been a
target for deep brain stimulation in treatment-resistant depression [11]. Our
results also demonstrated a positive correlation of the right caudate node
strength with age (Fig. 3), suggesting a developmental delay of its connections
in adolescent MDD. This is in line with the finding that the fibers connecting striatum
to prefrontal regions continue to mature
through adolescence [12]. Given the relatively recent onset of depression in
our sample, our findings may indicate that reduced structural connectivity of
the right caudate could be a risk factor for developing adolescent MDD.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1] Substance
Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (2014) NSDUH Series H-49, HHS
Publication No. (SMA) 14-4887.
[2] Tymofiyeva, O. et al. (2014) Br J Radiol
87(1039):20140086.
[3] Griffa, A. et al. (2013) Neuroimage 80:515-26.
[4]
LeWinn, K.Z. et al. (2014) J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 53:899-909.
[5]
Tzourio-Mazoyer, N. (2002) Neuroimage 15:273-289.
[6] Wang, R. et al. (2007)
Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med:3720.
[7] Rubinov, M. & Sporns, O. (2010)
NeuroImage 52:1059-69.
[8] Zalesky, A. et al. (2010) NeuroImage 53:1197-207.
[9]
Korgaonkar,
M.S. et al. (2014) Biol Psychiatry 76:567-574.
[10] Forbes,
E.E. & Dahl, R.E. (2012) J Child Psychol Psychiatry 53:3-15.
[11] Schlaepfer, T.E. et al. (2014)
Neuropsychopharmacol 39, 1303-1314.
[12] Asato, M.R. et al. (2010) Cereb Cortex
20:2122–2131.