Fast Imaging Employing Steady-State Acquisition of Brain Metastasis: from mouse to woman
Donna H Murrell1,2, Keng Yeow Tay3, Eugene Wong2,3, Ann F Chambers2,3, Francisco Perera3, and Paula J Foster1,2

1Imaging Research Laboratories, Robarts Research Institute, London, ON, Canada, 2Department of Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, ON, Canada, 3London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada

Synopsis

Brain metastatic burden may be underestimated in the clinic because some tumors are impermeable to Gadolinium (Gd). Preclinical studies by our group demonstrated that fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition (FIESTA) was advantageous for detecting small Gd-impermeable tumors. Here, we show clinical translation of this imaging strategy. We present FIESTA images of human brain metastasis alongside standard clinical MRI and illustrate potential clinical utility of this sequence. Initial data suggests FIESTA can visualize intra-tumor heterogeneity where standard clinical MRI could not. Additional lesions were observed in FIESTA; we hypothesize some may be arachnoid cysts, though metastasis cannot be ruled out.

Purpose

True brain metastatic burden may be underestimated by current diagnostic MRI protocols in the clinic. In radiology, the most accurate method for brain tumor detection is contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (T1w) MRI, acquired before and after intravenous administration of Gadolinium (Gd) contrast agents.1 In these images, tumors appear as regions of signal enhancement post-Gd because their growth causes damage to the local blood-brain barrier (BBB), which allows Gd to leak out of the vasculature and accumulate. Importantly, it is now understood that some metastases may grow in the brain without disrupting the BBB and instead develop around preexisting brain vasculature to access nutrients. In this case, Gd cannot cross the intact BBB and tumors may go undetected.2 Preclinical studies performed in our lab illustrated this phenomenon by comparing tumor detection using FIESTA (fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition) with post-Gd T1w images in a breast cancer brain metastasis model (Figure 1). A significant number of Gd-impermeable tumors (not detected using post-Gd T1w MRI) were visible in FIESTA images and could be detected earlier in metastatic progression.3 Moreover, substantial heterogeneity existed in BBB permeability to Gd in different mouse models of brain metastasis and this affected tumor detection. In one model, post-Gd T1w imaging failed to detect more than 36% of brain metastases that were visible in FIESTA images.4 These preclinical findings warrant evaluation in patients. Here we translate our preclinical study to the clinic to evaluate the utility of FIESTA imaging for visualizing additional Gd-impermeable tumors in brain metastatic breast cancer patients.

Methods

Breast cancer patients with a new diagnosis of brain metastasis by MRI or CT were enrolled in our study (n=10 to date; recruiting 30) at the London Regional Cancer Program under an institution approved ethics protocol. The 3D FIESTA protocol was optimized (resolution: 1x1x1 mm, TR/TE≈5.6/2.2, BW=64, α=45°, NEX=1, time≈6 min) and added to the standard radiation oncology MR simulation (SIM) imaging session, which included T1w pre/post-Gd and T2-weighted protocols (resolution: 1x1x2 mm, 1x1x3mm respectively). Images were acquired on a 1.5 T MR-SIM with a head surface coil and analyzed for tumor incidence, size, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). The reporting radiologist and radiation oncologist were blind to the FIESTA result and followed standard of care for the patient. A reference radiologist (KYT) reported on FIESTA after the patient’s treatment was completed. Follow-up MRI, including FIESTA, will be acquired 3 months post-treatment.

Results & Discussion

In this cohort, 35 brain metastases were detected and had an average longest axial radius of 1.3 ± 0.9 cm. Tumor incidence ranged from 1-16 brain metastases per person, with two patients presenting with solitary tumors. The FIESTA sequence had the highest resolution with isotropic voxels of 1 mm. The CNR of tumor to contralateral brain was comparable to T2w images, though the FIESTA contrast mechanism is different and relies on T2/T1 relaxation times (Figure 2). The reference radiologist has reported on the FIESTA images for five patients. Of particular interest were several suspicious lesions observed in close proximity to the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) on FIESTA images, which were not obvious in either T1w or T2w images (Figure 3). In the top row the border of a lesion is clear in FIESTA but obscure in T1w or T2w images. We hypothesize that this is an arachnoid cyst because of the fluid-filled appearance; however, metastatic growth cannot be ruled out at this time. In the bottom row a hyperintense lesion in FIESTA is isointense on T1 and T2w images. This may represent a brain metastasis. The FIESTA sequence may also offer additional information about tumor content; for example a tumor that appeared homogenous on clinical scans appeared heterogeneous with FIESTA (Figure 4). Using the FIESTA sequence alone, the reference radiologist was able to detect 5/7 tumors present on the T1w and T2w images. Both of the tumors that could not be detected using FIESTA were located on the ventricles, and one was also undetectable on T2w images (Figure 5).

Conclusion

The FIESTA protocol was successfully implemented at 1.5 T for brain metastasis detection in breast cancer patients. To date, 10/30 patients have been recruited and preliminary results are promising. Initial data demonstrated that FIESTA offers the ability to visualize intra-tumor heterogeneity and additional lesions that are not discernable in standard clinical scans. Gd-enhanced T1w imaging is still necessary for detection of small brain tumors near ventricles as FIESTA fell short in this area. When all patients are enrolled, we will be able to confirm whether FIESTA may improve brain metastasis detection and how it may lead to better patient management and survival.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all participating patients and staff at the London Regional Cancer Program. The authors also thank Trevor Szekeres, Jeff Gaudet, and Ashley Makela for their assistance with sequence optimization.

This research was funded by Western University's Collaborative Seed Funding Initiative.

DHM is supported by a Fellowship funded by the Canadian Breast Cancer Foundation - Ontario Region, a Translational Breast Cancer Traineeship funded in part by the Breast Cancer Society of Canada, and the CIHR Strategic Training Program in Cancer Research and Technology Transfer award. AFC is Canada Research Chair in Oncology, supported by the Canada Research Chairs Program.

References

1. Fink KR and Fink JR. Imaging of brain metastasis. Surg Neurol Int 2013; 4 (Suppl 4): S204-2S219.

2. Leenders WPJ, Kusters B, Verrjp K, et al. Antiangiogenic therapy of cerebral melanoma metastases results in sustained tumor progression via vessel co-option. Clin Cancer Res 2004; 10: 6222-6230.

3. Percy DB, Ribot EJ, Chen Y, et al. In vivo characterization of changing blood-tumor barrier permeability in a mouse model of breast cancer metastasis: a complementary magnetic resonance imaging approach. Invest Radiol 2011; 46(11): 718-725.

4. Murrell DM, Hamilton AM, Mallett CL, et al. Understanding heterogeneity and permeability of brain metastases in murine models of HER2-positive breast cancer through magnetic resonance imaging: implications for detection and therapy. Transl Oncol 2015; 8(3): 176-184.

Figures

Preclinical imaging of mice bearing brain metastasis suggests that T1w post-Gd images do not detect as many tumors as FIESTA. It has been demonstrated that tumors detected in T1w post-Gd images (blue arrows) have disrupted the BBB, whereas those detected only in FIESTA (yellow arrows) develop with the BBB intact.

Breast cancer patient imaging: CNR between tumor and contralateral normal brain was measured for every brain metastasis detectable in T1w, T2w, and FIESTA images. FIESTA offers similar CNR compared to T2w images.

Suspicious lesions were detected by FIESTA that weren’t obvious in T1w or T2w images. FIESTA illustrated demarcation of a fluid-filled lesion against CSF by resolving a border that was previously imperceptible (top). A hyperintense lesion was also present in FIESTA that was isointense on both T1w and T2w images (bottom).

Representative T1w pre- and post-Gd, T2w, and FIESTA images demonstrate tumor detection using each sequence. Here, the indicated tumor is ring-enhancing in the post-Gd T1w image and surrounded by substantial edema in the T2w image. FIESTA offers clear demarcation from edema and highlights heterogeneity within the tumor.


Contrast enhancement is necessary for the detection of small brain tumors near the ventricles, as they were apparent on T1w post-Gd, but not visible on T2w or FIESTA images. Interestingly, the silhouette of the tumor is visible against the ventricle in FIESTA, whereas this information is not present in T2w.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
1365