Donna H Murrell1,2, Keng Yeow Tay3, Eugene Wong2,3, Ann F Chambers2,3, Francisco Perera3, and Paula J Foster1,2
1Imaging Research Laboratories, Robarts Research Institute, London, ON, Canada, 2Department of Medical Biophysics, Western University, London, ON, Canada, 3London Health Sciences Centre, London, ON, Canada
Synopsis
Brain
metastatic burden may be underestimated in the clinic because some tumors are
impermeable to Gadolinium (Gd). Preclinical studies by our group demonstrated
that fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition (FIESTA) was advantageous
for detecting small Gd-impermeable tumors. Here, we show clinical translation
of this imaging strategy. We present FIESTA images of human brain metastasis
alongside standard clinical MRI and illustrate potential clinical utility of
this sequence. Initial data suggests FIESTA can visualize intra-tumor
heterogeneity where standard clinical MRI could not. Additional lesions were
observed in FIESTA; we hypothesize some may be arachnoid cysts, though
metastasis cannot be ruled out. Purpose
True
brain metastatic burden may be underestimated by current diagnostic MRI protocols
in the clinic. In radiology, the most accurate method for brain tumor detection
is contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (T1w) MRI, acquired before and after
intravenous administration of Gadolinium (Gd) contrast agents.
1 In
these images, tumors appear as regions of signal enhancement post-Gd because
their growth causes damage to the local blood-brain barrier (BBB), which allows
Gd to leak out of the vasculature and accumulate. Importantly, it is now
understood that some metastases may grow in the brain without disrupting the
BBB and instead develop around preexisting brain vasculature to access
nutrients. In this case, Gd cannot cross the intact BBB and tumors may go
undetected.
2 Preclinical studies performed in our lab illustrated
this phenomenon by comparing tumor detection using FIESTA (fast imaging
employing steady-state acquisition) with post-Gd T1w images in a breast cancer
brain metastasis model (Figure 1). A significant number of Gd-impermeable
tumors (not detected using post-Gd T1w MRI) were visible in FIESTA images and could
be detected earlier in metastatic progression.
3 Moreover, substantial
heterogeneity existed in BBB permeability to Gd in different mouse models of
brain metastasis and this affected tumor detection. In one model, post-Gd T1w
imaging failed to detect more than 36% of brain metastases that were visible in
FIESTA images.
4 These preclinical findings warrant evaluation in
patients. Here we translate our
preclinical study to the clinic to evaluate the utility of FIESTA imaging for
visualizing additional Gd-impermeable tumors in brain metastatic breast cancer
patients.
Methods
Breast
cancer patients with a new diagnosis of brain metastasis by MRI or CT were
enrolled in our study (n=10 to date; recruiting 30) at the London Regional
Cancer Program under an institution approved ethics protocol. The 3D FIESTA
protocol was optimized (resolution: 1x1x1 mm, TR/TE≈5.6/2.2, BW=64, α=45°, NEX=1, time≈6 min) and added to the standard radiation
oncology MR simulation (SIM) imaging session, which included T1w pre/post-Gd
and T2-weighted protocols (resolution: 1x1x2 mm, 1x1x3mm respectively). Images
were acquired on a 1.5 T MR-SIM with a head surface coil and analyzed for tumor
incidence, size, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). The reporting radiologist
and radiation oncologist were blind to the FIESTA result and followed standard
of care for the patient. A reference radiologist (KYT) reported on FIESTA after
the patient’s treatment was completed. Follow-up MRI, including FIESTA, will be
acquired 3 months post-treatment.
Results & Discussion
In this cohort, 35 brain metastases were detected and
had an average longest axial radius of 1.3 ± 0.9 cm. Tumor incidence ranged from
1-16 brain metastases per person, with two patients presenting with solitary
tumors. The FIESTA sequence had the highest resolution with isotropic voxels of
1 mm. The CNR of tumor to contralateral brain was comparable to T2w images,
though the FIESTA contrast mechanism is different and relies on T2/T1
relaxation times (Figure 2). The reference radiologist has reported on the
FIESTA images for five patients. Of particular interest were several suspicious
lesions observed in close proximity to the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) on FIESTA
images, which were not obvious in either T1w or T2w images (Figure 3). In the
top row the border of a lesion is clear in FIESTA but obscure in T1w or T2w
images. We hypothesize that this is an arachnoid cyst because of the
fluid-filled appearance; however, metastatic growth cannot be ruled out at this
time. In the bottom row a hyperintense lesion in FIESTA is isointense on T1 and
T2w images. This may represent a brain
metastasis.
The FIESTA sequence may also
offer additional information about tumor content; for example a tumor that
appeared homogenous on clinical scans appeared heterogeneous with FIESTA
(Figure 4). Using the FIESTA sequence alone, the reference radiologist was able
to detect 5/7 tumors present on the T1w and T2w images. Both of the tumors that
could not be detected using FIESTA were located on the ventricles, and one was
also undetectable on T2w images (Figure 5).
Conclusion
The
FIESTA protocol was successfully implemented at 1.5 T for brain metastasis
detection in breast cancer patients. To date, 10/30 patients have been
recruited and preliminary results are promising. Initial data demonstrated that
FIESTA offers the ability to visualize intra-tumor heterogeneity and additional lesions that are not discernable in standard clinical scans. Gd-enhanced T1w
imaging is still necessary for detection of small brain tumors near ventricles
as FIESTA fell short in this area. When
all patients are enrolled, we will be able to confirm whether FIESTA may improve
brain metastasis detection and how it may lead to better patient management and
survival.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank all participating patients and staff at the London Regional Cancer Program. The authors also thank Trevor Szekeres, Jeff Gaudet, and Ashley Makela for their assistance with sequence optimization.
This research was funded by Western University's Collaborative Seed Funding Initiative.
DHM is supported by a Fellowship funded by the Canadian Breast Cancer Foundation - Ontario Region, a Translational Breast Cancer Traineeship funded in part by the Breast Cancer Society of Canada, and the CIHR Strategic Training Program in Cancer Research and Technology Transfer award. AFC is Canada Research Chair in Oncology, supported by the Canada Research Chairs Program.
References
1.
Fink KR and Fink JR. Imaging of brain metastasis. Surg Neurol Int 2013; 4 (Suppl 4):
S204-2S219.
2.
Leenders WPJ, Kusters B, Verrjp K, et al. Antiangiogenic
therapy of cerebral melanoma metastases results in sustained tumor progression
via vessel co-option. Clin Cancer Res 2004;
10: 6222-6230.
3.
Percy DB, Ribot EJ, Chen Y, et al. In vivo characterization
of changing blood-tumor barrier permeability in a mouse model of breast cancer
metastasis: a complementary magnetic resonance imaging approach. Invest Radiol 2011; 46(11): 718-725.
4.
Murrell DM, Hamilton AM, Mallett CL, et al. Understanding
heterogeneity and permeability of brain metastases in murine models of
HER2-positive breast cancer through magnetic resonance imaging: implications
for detection and therapy. Transl Oncol 2015;
8(3): 176-184.