Translation of 2-hydroxyglutarate MR spectroscopy into clinics
Zhongxu An1, Sandeep Ganji1, Vivek Tiwari1, Edward Pan2,3,4, Bruce Mickey2,4,5, Elizabeth A. Maher2,3,5,6, and Changho Choi1,2,7

1Advanced Imaging Research Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States, 2Harold C. Simmons Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States, 3Department of Neurology and Neurotherapeutics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States, 4Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States, 5Annette Strauss Center for Neuro-Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States, 6Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States, 7Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States

Synopsis

2-hydroxyglutarate (2HG) is an important biomarker for IDH-mutated gliomas. Thus in vivo measurement of 2-hydroxyglutarate can provide important information for brain tumor diagnosis and prognosis. Several techniques for in-vivo detection of 2HG were reported recently. However, due to limited access to scan parameters in clinical setup, translation of such techniques into clinics is limited. We report the reproducibility of a recently developed clinically-available PRESS-based 1H MRS method, for in vivo 2HG measurement at research and clinical scanners.

Purpose

2-hydroxyglutarate (2HG) is the first imaging biomarker that is specific for IDH-mutated gliomas, which are associated with better treatment response and longer patient survival1,2, and therefore may have important implications for use in management of patients with brain tumors. Recent development of in vivo 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) at 3T may provide an effective tool for noninvasive measurement of 2HG in IDH-mutated gliomas3-5. However, the potential impact of this imaging biomarker for patients can only be realized when the technique is widely available in clinical scanners at academic/community radiology centers. The purpose of this study is to test the reproducibility of 2-hydroxyglutarate MRS between research and clinical scans.

METHODS

Twenty-seven glioma patients were recruited (17 IDH mutated glioma patients confirmed with biopsy, 10 IDH mutation status unknown). Each subject underwent two MRS examinations using a published 2HG-optimized PRESS TE=97ms method at 3T3; one in a clinical scanner and the other in a research scanner on the same day. The 2HG MRS in the clinical scanner were operated solely by technologists and those in the research scanner by a research member. Two patients were scanned at 4 time points in both scanners, and the total number of clinical/research scan pairs being 35. The research scanners were equipped with an 8-channel head coil and the clinical scanner with a 32-channel head coil (both. Voxel size was 4 – 8 mL depending on tumor volume identified with T2w-FLAIR. Data acquisition parameters included TR = 2 s, sweep width = 2.5 kHz, number of sampling points = 2048, and number of averages = 128 – 512. In clinical site, total scan time was less than 10 minutes and sub-echo times of PRESS sequence, which were tuned to TE1 = 32 ms and TE2 = 65 ms in research scanner, were TE1 = 34 ms and TE2 = 63 ms. Water unsuppressed data was acquired for eddy current compensation and multi-channel combination. Spectral fitting was performed with LCModel software6, using basis spectra calculated incorporating the volume localizing RF and gradient pulses of PRESS using published chemical shift and J-coupling constants7,8. Metabolite quantification was conducted with reference to water at 45 M.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Representative in vivo spectra of reproducibility test scans of two glioma patients are presented in Figure 1. With the high-risk of getting biopsy from the brain stem region, tumor and IDH mutation type were unknown for the first patient shown. The estimation of 2HG, as well as glutamate and glutamine was well reproduced in the two scanners (6.1 mM vs 6.5 mM; 2.7mM vs 2.7 mM; 0.8 mM vs 0.9 mM, respectively). The second patient had an IDH 2 mutated glioma (biopsy confirmed) with reproducible 2HG estimates from the two scanners (2.0 mM vs 1.7 mM) and ignorable residuals. Of the 35 pairs of MRS data sets, 4 pairs of data had singlet linewidth larger than 0.1 ppm and thus were excluded for metabolite estimation. Excluding these 4 pairs, 31 pairs of data (shown in Fig. 2) were included for subsequent statistical analysis. 2HG and total choline (tCho) estimates from the clinical and research scans were shown in Figure 3a and 3c. The concentrations of 2HG from the two scanners were found to be very similar (3.69 ± 2.47 mM vs. 3.73 ± 2.45 mM, paired t-test p value = 0.74). Small coefficient of variation (CV) (=0.11) and large intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) (= 0.97) of 2HG estimation further confirmed the high reproducibility of the 2HG MRS between the pairs of scans. Shown in Figure 3b, 2HG estimate differences (0.03 ± 0.61 mM) between the two scanners were less than 1 mM in all cases. Similarly, small CV (0.09) and large ICC (0.97) were obtained for tCho, which is elevated in tumors, indicating good reproducibility between clinical and research scans.

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrates that evaluation of 2HG across research and clinical scans using optimized PRESS is highly reproducible, suggestive of widespread dissemination of the 2HG MRS protocol for clinical use.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by CPRIT RP130427.

References

1. Dang L, White DW, Gross S, et al. Cancer-associated IDH1 mutations produce 2-hydroxyglutarate. Nature 2009; 462(7274): 739-44.

2. Christensen BC, Smith AA, Zheng S, et al. DNA methylation, isocitrate dehydrogenase mutation, and survival in glioma. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011; 103(2): 143-53

3. Choi C, Ganji SK, DeBerardinis RJ, et al. 2-hydroxyglutarate detection by magnetic resonance spectroscopy in IDH-mutated patients with gliomas. Nat Med. 2012; 18(4): 624-629.

4. Pope WB, Prins RM, Albert Thomas M, et al. Non-invasive detection of 2-hydroxyglutarate and other metabolites in IDH1 mutant glioma patients using magnetic resonance spectroscopy. J Neurooncol. 2012; 107(1): 197-205.

5. Andronesi OC, Kim GS, Gerstner E, et al. Detection of 2-hydroxyglutarate in IDH-mutated glioma patients by in vivo spectral-editing and 2D correlation magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Sci Transl Med 2012; 4(116): 116ra4.

6. Provencher SW. Estimation of metabolite concentrations from localized in vivo proton NMR spectra. Magn Res Med. 1993; 30(6): 672-9.

7. Govindaraju V, Young K, Maudsley AA. Proton NMR chemical shifts and coupling constants for brain metabolites. NMR Biomed 2000; 13(3): 129-53.

8. Bal D, Gryff-Keller A. 1H and 13C NMR study of 2-hydroxyglutaric acid and its lactone. 2002; Epub.

Figures

Fig 1. Representative in vivo spectra from two glioma patients, obtained with PRESS TE = 97 ms at 3T from research and clinical scanners, are shown together with LCModel fits, residuals and metabolites signals. The numbers are concentrations and CRLBs. (a) Brain stem tumor. (b) IDH-2 mutated glioma.

Fig 2. 31 pairs of spectra obtained from research and clinical scanners

Fig 3. (a) 2HG estimations from clinical and research scanner. (b) 2HG estimation differences between clinical and research scanners. (c) Total choline (tCho) estimations from clinical and research scanner.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
1353