The value of combining conventional, diffusion-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging for the diagnosis of parotid gland tumors
Xiaofeng Tao1, gongxin yang1, Yingwei Wu2, huimin shi1, pingzhong wang1, yongming Dai3, wenjing zhu1, Weiqing gao1, and qiang yu1

1Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, shanghai, China, People's Republic of, 2Shanghai Ninth People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China, People's Republic of, 3PHLIPS healthcare China, shanghai, China, People's Republic of

Synopsis

The aim of this study was to determine the value of combining conventional MR imaging (MRI), diffusion-weighted (DW-MRI) and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) in diagnosing solid neoplasms in the parotid gland. Materials and Methods:A total of 148 subjects (101 with benign and 47 with malignant tumors) were evaluated with conventional MRI, DW-MRI and DCE-MRI prior to surgery and pathologic verification. The items observed with conventional MRI included the shape, capsule and signal intensity of parotid masses. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was calculated from DW-MRI that was obtained with a b factor of 0 and 1000 s/mm2. A time-intensity curve (TIC) was obtained from DCE-MRI. Results:There were significant differences (p<0.01) in the shape, capsule, ADC and TIC between benign and malignant parotid tumors. Irregular neoplasms without capsule, ADC < 1.12×10-3mm2/s, and a plateau enhancement pattern were valuable parameters for predicting malignant neoplasms. A combination of all of these parameters yielded sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values of 85.1%, 94.1%, 91.2%, and 87.0% and 93.1%, respectively. Conclusion:A combined analysis using conventional MRI, DW-MRI and DCE-MRI is helpful to distinguish benign from malignant tumors in the parotid gland.

Purpose

Purpose:The aim of this study was to determine the value of combining conventional MR imaging (MRI), diffusion-weighted (DW-MRI) and dynamic contrast enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) in diagnosing solid neoplasms in the parotid gland.

Materials and Methods

Materials and Methods:A total of 148 subjects (101 with benign and 47 with malignant tumors) were evaluated with conventional MRI, DW-MRI and DCE-MRI prior to surgery and pathologic verification. The items observed with conventional MRI included the shape, capsule and signal intensity of parotid masses. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was calculated from DW-MRI that was obtained with a b factor of 0 and 1000 s/mm2. A time-intensity curve (TIC) was obtained from DCE-MRI.

Results

Results:There were significant differences (p<0.01) in the shape, capsule, ADC and TIC between benign and malignant parotid tumors. Irregular neoplasms without capsule, ADC < 1.12×10-3mm2/s, and a plateau enhancement pattern were valuable parameters for predicting malignant neoplasms. A combination of all of these parameters yielded sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values of 85.1%, 94.1%, 91.2%, and 87.0% and 93.1%, respectively.

Conclusion

Conclusion:A combined analysis using conventional MRI, DW-MRI and DCE-MRI is helpful to distinguish benign from malignant tumors in the parotid gland.

Acknowledgements

No acknowledgement found.

References

1. Scianna JM, Petruzzelli GJ: Contemporary management of tumors of the salivary glands. Current oncology reports 2007, 9(2):134-138. 2. Swoboda H, Franz P: Salivary gland tumors. Clinical aspects and therapy. Der Radiologe 1994, 34(5):232-238. 3. Elagoz S, Gulluoglu M, Yilmazbayhan D, Ozer H, Arslan I: The value of fine-needle aspiration cytology in salivary gland lesions, 1994-2004. ORL; journal for oto-rhino-laryngology and its related specialties 2007, 69(1):51-56. 4. Mihashi H, Kawahara A, Kage M, Kojiro M, Nakashima T, Umeno H, Sakamoto K, Chiziwa H: Comparison of preoperative fine-needle aspiration cytology diagnosis and histopathological diagnosis of salivary gland tumors. The Kurume medical journal 2006, 53(1-2):23-27. 5. Das DK, Petkar MA, Al-Mane NM, Sheikh ZA, Mallik MK, Anim JT: Role of fine needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of swellings in the salivary gland regions: a study of 712 cases. Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre 2004, 13(2):95-106. 6. Zbaren P, Nuyens M, Loosli H, Stauffer E: Diagnostic accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology and frozen section in primary parotid carcinoma. Cancer 2004, 100(9):1876-1883. 7. Al-Khafaji BM, Nestok BR, Katz RL: Fine-needle aspiration of 154 parotid masses with histologic correlation: ten-year experience at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. Cancer 1998, 84(3):153-159. 8. Seethala RR, LiVolsi VA, Baloch ZW: Relative accuracy of fine-needle aspiration and frozen section in the diagnosis of lesions of the parotid gland. Head & neck 2005, 27(3):217-223. 9. Christe A, Waldherr C, Hallett R, Zbaeren P, Thoeny H: MR imaging of parotid tumors: typical lesion characteristics in MR imaging improve discrimination between benign and malignant disease. AJNR American journal of neuroradiology 2011, 32(7):1202-1207. 10. Freling NJ, Molenaar WM, Vermey A, Mooyaart EL, Panders AK, Annyas AA, Thijn CJ: Malignant parotid tumors: clinical use of MR imaging and histologic correlation. Radiology 1992, 185(3):691-696. 11. Yousem DM, Kraut MA, Chalian AA: Major salivary gland imaging. Radiology 2000, 216(1):19-29. 12. Teresi LM, Lufkin RB, Wortham DG, Abemayor E, Hanafee WN: Parotid masses: MR imaging. Radiology 1987, 163(2):405-409. 13. Joe VQ, Westesson PL: Tumors of the parotid gland: MR imaging characteristics of various histologic types. AJR American journal of roentgenology 1994, 163(2):433-438. 14. Eida S, Sumi M, Sakihama N, Takahashi H, Nakamura T: Apparent diffusion coefficient mapping of salivary gland tumors: prediction of the benignancy and malignancy. AJNR American journal of neuroradiology 2007, 28(1):116-121. 15. Lyng H, Haraldseth O, Rofstad EK: Measurement of cell density and necrotic fraction in human melanoma xenografts by diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging. Magnetic resonance in medicine : official journal of the Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine / Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2000, 43(6):828-836. 16. Matsushima N, Maeda M, Takamura M, Takeda K: Apparent diffusion coefficients of benign and malignant salivary gland tumors. Comparison to histopathological findings. Journal of neuroradiology Journal de neuroradiologie 2007, 34(3):183-189. 17. Motoori K, Yamamoto S, Ueda T, Nakano K, Muto T, Nagai Y, Ikeda M, Funatsu H, Ito H: Inter- and intratumoral variability in magnetic resonance imaging of pleomorphic adenoma: an attempt to interpret the variable magnetic resonance findings. Journal of computer assisted tomography 2004, 28(2):233-246. 18. Wang J, Takashima S, Takayama F, Kawakami S, Saito A, Matsushita T, Momose M, Ishiyama T: Head and neck lesions: characterization with diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology 2001, 220(3):621-630. 19. Wang P, Yang J, Yu Q, Ai S, Zhu W: Evaluation of solid lesions affecting masticator space with diffusion-weighted MR imaging. Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics 2010, 109(6):900-907. 20. Yerli H, Aydin E, Haberal N, Harman A, Kaskati T, Alibek S: Diagnosing common parotid tumours with magnetic resonance imaging including diffusion-weighted imaging vs fine-needle aspiration cytology: a comparative study. Dento maxillo facial radiology 2010, 39(6):349-355. 21. Yoshino N, Yamada I, Ohbayashi N, Honda E, Ida M, Kurabayashi T, Maruyama K, Sasaki T: Salivary glands and lesions: evaluation of apparent diffusion coefficients with split-echo diffusion-weighted MR imaging--initial results. Radiology 2001, 221(3):837-842. 22. Habermann CR, Arndt C, Graessner J, Diestel L, Petersen KU, Reitmeier F, Ussmueller JO, Adam G, Jaehne M: Diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging of primary parotid gland tumors: is a prediction of different histologic subtypes possible? AJNR American journal of neuroradiology 2009, 30(3):591-596. 23. Eida S, Ohki M, Sumi M, Yamada T, Nakamura T: MR factor analysis: improved technology for the assessment of 2D dynamic structures of benign and malignant salivary gland tumors. Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI 2008, 27(6):1256-1262. 24. Eida S, Sumi M, Nakamura T: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for the differentiation between benign and malignant salivary gland tumors. Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI 2010, 31(3):673-679. 25. El Shahat HM, Fahmy HS, Gouhar GK: Diagnostic value of gadolinium-enhanced dynamic MR imaging for parotid gland tumors. The Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine 2013, 44(2):203-207. 26. Hisatomi M, Asaumi J, Yanagi Y, Unetsubo T, Maki Y, Murakami J, Matsuzaki H, Honda Y, Konouchi H: Diagnostic value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the salivary gland tumors. Oral oncology 2007, 43(9):940-947. 27. Matsuzaki H, Yanagi Y, Hara M, Katase N, Asaumi J, Hisatomi M, Unetsubo T, Konouchi H, Takenobu T, Nagatsuka H: Minor salivary gland tumors in the oral cavity: diagnostic value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. European journal of radiology 2012, 81(10):2684-2691. 28. Suenaga S, Indo H, Noikura T: Diagnostic value of dynamic magnetic resonance imaging for salivary gland diseases: a preliminary study. Dento maxillo facial radiology 2001, 30(6):314-318. 29. Yabuuchi H, Fukuya T, Tajima T, Hachitanda Y, Tomita K, Koga M: Salivary gland tumors: diagnostic value of gadolinium-enhanced dynamic MR imaging with histopathologic correlation. Radiology 2003, 226(2):345-354. 30. Lechner Goyault J, Riehm S, Neuville A, Gentine A, Veillon F: Interest of diffusion-weighted and gadolinium-enhanced dynamic MR sequences for the diagnosis of parotid gland tumors. Journal of neuroradiology Journal de neuroradiologie 2011, 38(2):77-89. 31. Yabuuchi H, Matsuo Y, Kamitani T, Setoguchi T, Okafuji T, Soeda H, Sakai S, Hatakenaka M, Nakashima T, Oda Y et al: Parotid gland tumors: can addition of diffusion-weighted MR imaging to dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging improve diagnostic accuracy in characterization? Radiology 2008, 249(3):909-916. 32. Sakamoto J, Yoshino N, Okochi K, Imaizumi A, Tetsumura A, Kurohara K, Kurabayashi T: Tissue characterization of head and neck lesions using diffusion-weighted MR imaging with SPLICE. European journal of radiology 2009, 69(2):260-268. 33. Thoeny HC, De Keyzer F, Boesch C, Hermans R: Diffusion-weighted imaging of the parotid gland: Influence of the choice of b-values on the apparent diffusion coefficient value. Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI 2004, 20(5):786-790. 34. Uhl M, Altehoefer C, Kontny U, Il'yasov K, Buchert M, Langer M: MRI-diffusion imaging of neuroblastomas: first results and correlation to histology. European radiology 2002, 12(9):2335-2338. 35. Ercan INCI, Elif HOCAOGLU, Özgür KILIÇKESMEZ, Sibel AYDIN, Tan CIMILLI: Quantitative diffusion- weighted MR imaging in the differential diagnosis of parotid gland tumors Is it a useful technique?. Turkiye Klinikleri J Med Sci 2010, 30(4):1339-1345.

Figures

Pleomorphic adenoma of the right parotid gland (a) Axial T1-weighted MR image shows a hypointense mass (in the right parotid gland. (b) Axial T2-weighted MR image shows a heterogeneously hyperintense mass (c) Coronal T2-weighted MR image shows a hypointense capsule (d) The round cursor marks the ROI selected for signal intensity measurement with dynamic MR imaging. (e) The TIC shows a persistent enhancement pattern (type A). (f) The DWI image shows a relatively high signal intensity mass.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
1341