Ken-Pin Hwang1, Jingfei Ma1, Ping Hou1, Ho-Ling Anthony Liu1, Kang Wang2, and T. Linda Chi3
1Department of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States, 2MR Applications and Workflow, General Electric Healthcare, Waukesha, WI, United States, 3Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
Synopsis
2-point Dixon water-fat separation is implemented in a Cube
(3D FSE) sequence. It is compared with IR-FSPGR and Cube with fat saturation
for post-contrast T1-weighted high resolution imaging of the orbits. Dixon
water-fat separation provided even fat suppression through the imaging volume
and maintained the signal efficiency of the other techniques. Optic nerve was
well delineated even through areas of high susceptibility, and large vessels
were well suppressed relative to nearby structures. We thus demonstrate a
promising new technique for evaluating disease in a challenging area with fine
structures and high susceptibility.Introduction
Patient and globe motion, high susceptibility, and high
spatial resolution requirements make orbits a challenging application for MR
imaging. A high resolution, fat suppressed 3D T1 weighted sequence is necessary
to properly discern whether contrast enhancement is within the optic nerve, the
perineural space, the dural sheath, or extrinsic to both the optic nerve and
sheath. While IR-prepared gradient echo sequences are typically used in such
applications, recent advances in the acquisition speed and image contrast of 3D
FSE based sequences have made them a viable alternative. Similarly, Dixon
fat-water separation is now robust enough to provide water-only images in areas
of high susceptibility. In this study, we investigate the combination of these
techniques for assessing the integrity of the optic nerve and enhancement of
orbital tumors.
Methods
A 3D Cube sequence [1] was modified to acquire in-phase and
out-of-phase echoes for 2-point water-fat separation [2]. The echoes were
acquired in separate passes for high resolution imaging. Imaging was performed using
a 3.0T whole body imager and 32-channel head coil (GE Healthcare, Waukesha,
WI). After gadolinium contrast injection was applied to a subject with a lesion
around the orbits, three 3D T1-weighted sequences were acquired: an IR-prepared
FSPGR with fat sat, a Cube with fat sat, and a Cube with 2-point Dixon. All
sequences were acquired with the following parameters: FOV=16cm, matrix=256x256
(zero interpolated to 512x512), slice thickness=1mm (zero interpolated to
0.5mm), number of slices=64 (interpolated to 128). This resulted in an acquired
pixel size of 0.625x0.625x1mm, interpolated to 0.32x0.32x0.5mm. The IR-prepared
FSPGR was also acquired with: TE=2.3, TR=5.1, Flip=13, Bandwidth=+/-41.67kHz, TI=15.
T1 Cube sequences were also acquired with: TE=16.3 (fat sat) or 18.4 (Dixon),
TR=700, Bandwidth=+/-83.33kHz, ETL=24, ARC acceleration factor=2x1. Total scan
times were 2:55 (IR-FSPGR), 3:26 (Cube fat sat), 6:46 (Cube Dixon).
Results
Subject images are shown in figures 1 through 3. Overall,
the full extent of the optic nerve was best visualized with the Cube Dixon
technique. The IR-FSPGR best depicted the details of the nerve and dural sheath
in the area immediately posterior to the orbits, but the area around the optic
chiasm was more difficult to visualize due to the signal loss from
susceptibility and bright vessel signal from fresh blood inflow (arrows, figure 3). The Cube Dixon also had overall higher and
more consistent signal through the entire volume than the Cube with fat sat.
Discussion
We have shown certain advantages for applying 2-point Dixon
fat-water separation for high resolution MR imaging of the orbits. It’s
possible that the benefits can be extended to the rest of face as well, as
demonstrated previously with a 2D FSE acquisition in the head and neck [3]. Chemical
shift dependent fat saturation pulses are not robust in areas of high
susceptibility, and also risk saturation of water signal, as shown in both fat
sat acquisitions. Thus Dixon water-fat separation may also offer some signal
improvement by utilizing all of the acquired signal, instead of relying on
signal suppression techniques
Motion management plays an important role for imaging the
orbits. The subjects on this protocol are instructed to focus on a visual point
placed directly in front of the eyes on the scanner bore. 3D sequences provide
the thin slice, high resolution geometry required for imaging of the orbits and
can also better disperse motion artifacts compared to 2D sequences, though they
cannot resolve blurring due to motion. The Dixon sequence acquires the two
echoes in separate passes and hence requires twice the scan time of a
conventional acquisition. However, since this also results in double the number
of averages and maintains the same SNR efficiency, parallel imaging
acceleration could be increased slightly to reduce extension of scan time. Future improvements utilizing single-pass
Dixon acquisitions with flexible echo times [4,5] may enable the desired
resolution with little or no increase in scan time.
Acknowledgements
The authors thank Jerell Jones and D.Timothy Evans for their work in scanning the subjects in this study.References
1. Busse RF, et al. Magn Reson Med. 2006; 55:1030-7.
2. Ma J. Magn Reson Med. 2004; 52:415-9.
3. Ma J, et al. Am J Neuroradiol. 2009; 30:42-5.
4. Ma J, et al. Magn Reson Med. 2007; 58:103-9.
5. Son J, et al. Magn Reson Med. 2015.