Su Jin Lee1, Jin Wook Choi2, and Miran Han2
1Nuclear Medicine, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea, Republic of, 2Radiology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea, Republic of
Synopsis
MRI and PET can provide tumor biology information
noninvasively. ADC from DWI can represent cellularity, DCE-MRI can provide
microcirculation, and FDG PET can provide tumor metabolism. Intratumoral
heterogeneity is often associated with adverse tumor biology and it can be
assessed by these imaging parameters. Tumor heterogeneity on DWI can be simply evaluated
by the difference between minimum and maximum ADC value. Metabolism to
perfusion ratio can be calculated using DCE-MRI and FDG PET. Texture analysis
of PET can be used to evaluate tumor heterogeneity. Thus we investigated the
relationships between intraheterogeneity parameters derived from multimodality
imaging.Purpose
MRI and PET can provide tumor biology
information noninvasively. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) from diffusion
weighted imaging (DWI) can represent cellularity, dynamic contrast enhanced
(DCE) MRI can provide microcirculation, and fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET can
provide tumor metabolism. Intratumoral heterogeneity is often associated with
adverse tumor biology1,2 and it can be assessed by these imaging parameters.
Thus, we investigated the relationships between intratumoral heterogeneity
parameters derived from DWI, DCE MRI, and FDG PET in head and neck cancer.
Methods
Thirty patients who underwent DWI, DCE MRI,
and FDG PET before treatment were retrospectively evaluated. We measured maximum
and minimum ADC (ADCmax, ADCmin) values of primary tumor on DWI, K
trans, K
ep on
DCE-MRI, and maximum, mean SUV, and peak SUL (lean body mass corrected SUV;
SULp) on PET. For intratumoral heterogeneity evaluation, ADC
diff (ADCmax - ADCmin) was calculated on DWI MRI.
3,4
We calculated metabolism-perfusion parameters (SUVs/K
trans, SUVs/K
ep) using DCE MRI and
FDG PET.
5 First-order statistics (skewness, kurtosis, entropy) and
high-order features (low grey-level run emphasis, high grey-level run emphasis,
low grey-level zone emphasis) were calculated using texture analysis of PET.
6
The relationships among heterogeneity parameters of primary tumor were
assessed.
Results
ADC
diff, an index of heterogeneity on DWI,
was significantly correlated with metabolism-perfusion parameters
(SUVmean/K
trans: r=0.381, p = 0.038; SULp/K
trans: r= 0.368, p = 0.457; SULp/K
ep:
r = 0.407, p = 0.026) using DCE and PET. ADC
diff was significantly correlated
with entropy (r = 0.458, p = 0.011) and high grey-level run emphasis (r =
0.428, p = 0.018) on PET texture analysis. We divided the patients to 2 groups by
median value of ADC
diff. In the tumor showing high ADC
diff, SUVmean/K
trans (p =
0.027), SUVmean/K
ep (p = 0.015), SULp/K
trans (p = 0.050), SULp/K
ep (p = 0.035)
were significantly increased compared with the tumor showing low ADC
diff. The
rate of tumor recurrence or disease progression was significantly higher in
high ADC
diff group than that of low ADC
diff group (66.7% vs. 26.7%, p = 0.028).
Conclusions
Heterogeneous tumor on DWI showed
metabolism-perfusion mismatch and poor prognosis in head and neck cancer. Tumor
heterogeneity parameters derived from MRI and PET may provide valuable
information on tumor biology and prediction of clinical outcome. A further
study using a larger population of patients is needed to validate the clinical
significance of intratumoral heterogeneity parameters derived from
multimodality imaging.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Gerlinger M, Rowan AJ, Horswell S, et
al. Intratumor heterogeneity and branched evolution revealed by multiregion
sequencing. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(10):883–892.
2. Van Allen EM, Wagle N, Stojanov P, et
al. Whole-exome sequencing and clinical interpretation of formalin-fixed,
paraffin-embedded tumor samples to guide precision cancer medicine. Nat Med.
2014;20(6):682–688.
3. Mori N, Ota H, Mugikura S, et al. Detection
of invasive components in cases of breast ductal carcinoma in situ on biopsy by
using apparent diffusion coefficient MR parameters. Eur Radiol 2013:23(10):2705–2712.
4. Yoon HJ, Kim Y, Kim BS. Intratumoral
metabolic heterogeneity predicts invasive components in breast ductal carcinoma
in situ. Eur Radiol. 2015;25(12):3648-3658.
5. An YS, Kang DK, Jung YS, et al. Tumor
metabolism and perfusion ratio assessed by 18F-FDG PET/CT and DCE-MRI in breast
cancer patients: Correlation with tumor subtype and histologic prognostic
factors. Eur J Radiol. 2015;84(7):1365-1370.
6. Yan J, Chu-Shern JL, Loi HY, et al. Impact
of Image Reconstruction Settings on Texture Features in 18F-FDG PET. J Nucl
Med. 2015;56(11):1667-1673.