Paul de Heer1, Jos Oudeman2, Aart J Nederveen2, and Andrew G Webb1
1CJ Gorter Center, Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands, 2Radiology, Amsterdam Medical Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
Synopsis
Imaging the brachial plexus can be
challenging due to the large variations in the B0 and transmit B1 fields in the
area of the neck and shoulders. These variations can result in poor background tissue
and fat suppression as well as reduction in the received signal from the nerves.
We wanted to study if the application of high permittivity pads could increase signal/contrast
in plexus brachialis imaging. By applying the pads the signal intensity of the
nerves increased from 25 to 50 while the background signal stays similar
resulting in a greater contrast of the brachial plexus.Purpose
The brachial plexus is a complex
network of nerves innervating the upper limbs. Various pathologies can cause
dysfunction of the brachial plexus with the most common being traumatic
injuries, obstetrical injuries in newborns and tumors. MR neurography is
increasingly used to assess therapeutic measures for brachial plexus injury. The
most commonly used MR sequence to image the plexus brachialis is the Short TI
Inversion Recovery (STIR) sequence. Recently new methods such as the SHeath
signal increased with INKed rest-tissue RARE Imaging (SHINKEI) and Dixon based methods
have been introduced(1, 2). Imaging the
brachial plexus can be challenging due to the large variations in the B0 and transmit
B1 fields in the area of the neck and shoulders (3). These
variations can result in poor background tissue and fat suppression as well as
reduced nerve signal. This artefact is especially visible posterior to the
clavicle bones. In previous research it has been shown that the contrast-to-noise
ratio and overall image quality in cardiac and abdominal imaging can be
increased using high permittivity (HP) pads (4, 5). Therefore
we wanted to study if this approach could also increase the image quality in
plexus brachialis imaging.
Materials and
Methods
Participants;
In total fifteen participants were scanned with three different pad
configurations. The institutional review board approved the study protocol, and
written informed consent was obtained from all participants.
Data
Acquisition; Experiments were performed on a 3 T Ingenia whole-body scanner
(Philips Healthcare, Best, the Netherlands). The body coil was used for
transmission and an anterior (16 elements) and posterior (12 elements) array
for reception. The entire scan protocol was performed twice: once without the
HP pads and once with the HP pads placed between the patient and the receive
array. The imaging protocol consisted of a one minute survey used for planning
a seven minute diffusion-prepared Dixon scan and a seven minute SHINKEI sequence.
B1+ maps were acquired using the actual flip angle method, and B1- maps were
derived using a 3D gradient-echo sequence with a flip angle of 5 degrees
geometrically aligned with the B1+ map (5).
High
permittivity pads; The HP pads were constructed using an aqueous suspension of
barium titanate with a 5:1 mass-mass ratio. This results in a very dense
mixture with a relative permittivity of approximately 300. From the three different
pad configurations tested here the most effective was selected were two HP pads
placed around the middle of the clavicle on the anterior side of the body
(figure 1). The weights of these HP pads were 1.6 kg each.
Data
Processing; Both the Dixon and SHINKEI sequences were reconstructed with a
running maximum intensity projection (MIP) averaging over ten slices.
Results
The transmit
field and receive sensitivities are shown with and without the pads (figure 2).
By applying the pads the transmit field increases in the area adjacent to the
pads. The receive sensitivity also increases around the area where the pads are
placed. In figure 3 the Dixon water image is shown with and without pads. The
signal intensity was plotted perpendicular to the brachial plexus on both
sides. After application of the pads the signal intensity of the nerves
increased for location A from 25 to 50 and location B from 23 to 43. The
background signal was similar with and without pads resulting in greater nerve
tissue contrast when the pads were applied. Both locations gain in contrast after
application of the pads although the contrast on the right hand side of the
subject is higher than that on the left.
Discussion
and Conclusion
We found a asymmetry in the contrast
between the left and right side. Future research should focus on the
introduction of asymmetric pads, for example using thicker pads on the left
side, to compensate for this difference. Furthermore different geometries and
placement of the pads could be studied to potentially reach an even higher
contrast. In the current setup the HP pad increase the contrast in the midclavicular
area by a factor-of-two.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Vargas
MI, Gariani J, Delattre BA, Dietemann JL, Lovblad K, Becker M.
Three-dimensional MR imaging of the brachial plexus. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol
2015; 19:137-148.
2. Kasper
JM, Wadhwa V, Scott KM, Rozen S, Xi Y, Chhabra A. SHINKEI--a novel 3D isotropic
MR neurography technique: technical advantages over 3DIRTSE-based imaging. Eur
Radiol 2015; 25:1672-1677.
3. Oudeman
J, Coolen BF, Mazzoli V, et al. Diffusion-prepared neurography of the brachial
plexus with a large field-of-view at 3T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2015.
4. Brink
WM, Webb AG. High permittivity pads reduce specific absorption rate, improve B1
homogeneity, and increase contrast-to-noise ratio for functional cardiac MRI at
3 T. Magn Reson Med 2014; 71:1632-1640.
5. de
Heer P, Brink WM, Kooij BJ, Webb AG. Increasing signal homogeneity and image
quality in abdominal imaging at 3 T with very high permittivity materials. Magn
Reson Med 2012; 68:1317-1324.
6. Wang J, Yang QX, Zhang X, et al. Polarization
of the RF field in a human head at high field: a study with a quadrature
surface coil at 7.0 T. Magn Reson Med 2002; 48:362-369.