Sachi Okuchi1, Yasutaka Fushimi1, Tomohisa Okada1,2, Akira Yamamoto1, Tsutomu Okada1, Takuya Hinoda1, Yutaka Natsuaki3, and Kaori Togashi1
1Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan, 2Human Brain Research Center, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine., Kyoto, Japan, 3Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., Huntington Beach, CA, United States
Synopsis
The PETRA sequence provided good image quality. We compared the visualization of the intracranial
arteries between TOF-MRA and PETRA-MRA, and
evaluated the visualization of the facial nerve canal among PETRA and other 3D
sequences (MPRAGE and SPACE). PETRA-MRA was less visualized at the
peripheral artery, but PETA-MRA was as well as TOF-MRA at the main trunk. In
the visualization of the facial nerve canal, PETRA was better than MPRAGE at
all segments and best at labyrinthine. PETRA would be useful for
the visualization of intracranial artery and facial nerve canal.Introduction
The pointwise encoding
time reduction with radial acquisition (PETRA) is the ultrashort TE sequence
(1), which provides good image quality
with less susceptibility artifacts and less acoustic noise (2).PETRA-MRA, which is the subtraction image created
from PETRA with/without saturation slab, showed promising results without flow
dephasing artifacts (3). There are few reports that intracranial TOF-MRA and PETRA-MRA
were compared (3), therefore, we evaluated the differences of the visualization
of intracranial arteries between TOF-MRA and PETRA-MRA.
We also hypothesized that the facial nerve
canal would be visualized better in PETRA than the other 3D sequences due to
less susceptibility artifact from skull and mastoid air cell.
Methods
Subjects
Fifteen volunteers (mean age 41, range 31-57 years) were enrolled in this under approval of
institutional review board with written informed consent. Scan was conducted using a 3T-MR system (Magnetom Skyra, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany)
with a 32-channel head
coil for 3D TOF-MRA (TR/TE 20/3.69 ms, FA18°, resolution 0.47 × 0.82 mm, 0.7 mm-thickness, matrix 384 × 267), PETRA (axial, TR/TE 4/0.07 ms, FA4°, resolution 0.67 ×
0.67 mm, 0.67 mm-thickness, matrix 320 × 320), T2-SPACE (sagittal, TR/TE 1800/273 ms, FA120°, resolution 0.65 × 0.98 mm, 0.8 mm-thickness, matrix 320 × 260) , and MPRAGE (sagittal, TR/TE 1900/2.58 ms, TI
900ms, FA9°, resolution 0.9 × 0.9 mm, 0.9
mm-thickness, matrix 256 × 256).
MR angiography
In PETRA-MRA,
subtraction images are created from PETRA with/without saturation slab at the
neck. In the evaluation of angiography, the MIP images of the TOF-MRA and
PETRA-MRA were reviewed (Figure1), and the visualization of middle cerebral
artery (M1, M2, M3, M4), anterior cerebral artery (A1, A2, A3), posterior
cerebral artery (P1, P2, P3) and internal carotid artery (C) was subjectively
evaluated on a 4-point scale as follows: 1=not visible (almost no signal), 2=poor
(structures are discontinuous), 3=good (structures are continuous, but
blurring), or 4=excellent (structures are continuous and sharply defined). In
addition, homogeneity of the signals in C was evaluated on a 3-point scale as
follows: 1=poor, 2=good, 3=excellent. The scores of
M1, M2, M3, M4, A1, A2, A3, P1, P2, P3, P4, C and homogeneity were compared
using Wilcoxon test and the total scores of all vessels were compared by using
a paired t test.
The facial nerve canal
The image
volumes of PETRA, T2-SPACE and MPRAGE were reconstructed in axial image of 0.9 mm
thickness by using syngo FUSION, and the visualization of the facial nerve
canal was evaluated (Figure2). The facial nerve canals were divided into the
four segments (labyrinthine, geniculate ganglion, tympanic, and mastoid). For
each of the left and right facial nerve canal, a three-point scale was used: 0 = not
visible, 1= partially visible, or 2= excellently visible. The scores were
compared among PETRA, T2-SPACE
and MPRAGE using Friedman test. A P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
MR angiography
In the comparison
of the MRAs, the scores of A3 and P3 and total scores of TOF-MRA were
statistically better than PETRA-MRA (P=0.0049,
0.0425, 0.0040), and others didn’t have statistically differences (Figure3). PETRA-MRA
showed significantly higher homogeneity of the signal at C (P=0.0010).
The facial nerve canal
In the comparison
of the facial nerve canals, at labyrinthine, the scores of PETRA were best and
there were significant differences between MPRAGE and PETRA. At geniculate
ganglion and tympanic and the sum of four segments, the scores of PETRA and T2-SPACE
were statistically better than MPRAGE. At mastoid, the scores of T2-SPACE were
best and there were significant differences between MPRAGE and T2-SPACE (Figure4).
Discussions
PETRA-MRA was less visualized at the
peripheral artery (A3, P3), but PETRA-MRA visualized intracranial arteries as good
as TOF-MRA at the other parts. In the visualization of facial nerve canal,
PETRA was better than MPRAGE at all segments and best at labyrinthine among all
3D sequences.
Conclusion
PETRA and PETRA-MRA were useful for the
visualization of intracranial artery and facial nerve canal.
Acknowledgements
We are
grateful to Mr. Katutoshi Murata and Mr. Yuta Urushibata, Siemens Japan K.K.,
for their useful comments on this study. This work was supported by JSPS
KAKENHI Grant Number 25461815.References
(1) Grodzki DM, Jakob
PM, Heismann B. Ultrashort echo time
imaging using pointwise encoding time reduction with radial acquisition
(PETRA). Magn Reson Med. 2012
Feb;67(2):510-8.
(2)Ida M,
Wakayama T, Nielsen ML, et al. Quiet T1-weighted imaging using PETRA: initial
clinical evaluation in intracranial tumor patients. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015
Feb;41(2):447-53.
(3)Natsuaki Y, Bi X, Grodzki
DM, et al. PETRA qMRA: Towards
Zero-Flow Dephasing Intracranial Non-Contrast MR Angiography. Proc.
ISMRM (2015)