The pointwise encoding time reduction with radial acquisition (PETRA) sequence: visualization of intracranial arteries and facial nerve canals
Sachi Okuchi1, Yasutaka Fushimi1, Tomohisa Okada1,2, Akira Yamamoto1, Tsutomu Okada1, Takuya Hinoda1, Yutaka Natsuaki3, and Kaori Togashi1

1Diagnostic Imaging and Nuclear Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan, 2Human Brain Research Center, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine., Kyoto, Japan, 3Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., Huntington Beach, CA, United States

Synopsis

The PETRA sequence provided good image quality. We compared the visualization of the intracranial arteries between TOF-MRA and PETRA-MRA, and evaluated the visualization of the facial nerve canal among PETRA and other 3D sequences (MPRAGE and SPACE). PETRA-MRA was less visualized at the peripheral artery, but PETA-MRA was as well as TOF-MRA at the main trunk. In the visualization of the facial nerve canal, PETRA was better than MPRAGE at all segments and best at labyrinthine. PETRA would be useful for the visualization of intracranial artery and facial nerve canal.

Introduction

The pointwise encoding time reduction with radial acquisition (PETRA) is the ultrashort TE sequence (1), which provides good image quality with less susceptibility artifacts and less acoustic noise (2).PETRA-MRA, which is the subtraction image created from PETRA with/without saturation slab, showed promising results without flow dephasing artifacts (3). There are few reports that intracranial TOF-MRA and PETRA-MRA were compared (3), therefore, we evaluated the differences of the visualization of intracranial arteries between TOF-MRA and PETRA-MRA. We also hypothesized that the facial nerve canal would be visualized better in PETRA than the other 3D sequences due to less susceptibility artifact from skull and mastoid air cell.

Methods

Subjects

Fifteen volunteers (mean age 41, range 31-57 years) were enrolled in this under approval of institutional review board with written informed consent. Scan was conducted using a 3T-MR system (Magnetom Skyra, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) with a 32-channel head coil for 3D TOF-MRA (TR/TE 20/3.69 ms, FA18°, resolution 0.47 × 0.82 mm, 0.7 mm-thickness, matrix 384 × 267), PETRA (axial, TR/TE 4/0.07 ms, FA4°, resolution 0.67 × 0.67 mm, 0.67 mm-thickness, matrix 320 × 320), T2-SPACE (sagittal, TR/TE 1800/273 ms, FA120°, resolution 0.65 × 0.98 mm, 0.8 mm-thickness, matrix 320 × 260) , and MPRAGE (sagittal, TR/TE 1900/2.58 ms, TI 900ms, FA9°, resolution 0.9 × 0.9 mm, 0.9 mm-thickness, matrix 256 × 256).

MR angiography

In PETRA-MRA, subtraction images are created from PETRA with/without saturation slab at the neck. In the evaluation of angiography, the MIP images of the TOF-MRA and PETRA-MRA were reviewed (Figure1), and the visualization of middle cerebral artery (M1, M2, M3, M4), anterior cerebral artery (A1, A2, A3), posterior cerebral artery (P1, P2, P3) and internal carotid artery (C) was subjectively evaluated on a 4-point scale as follows: 1=not visible (almost no signal), 2=poor (structures are discontinuous), 3=good (structures are continuous, but blurring), or 4=excellent (structures are continuous and sharply defined). In addition, homogeneity of the signals in C was evaluated on a 3-point scale as follows: 1=poor, 2=good, 3=excellent. The scores of M1, M2, M3, M4, A1, A2, A3, P1, P2, P3, P4, C and homogeneity were compared using Wilcoxon test and the total scores of all vessels were compared by using a paired t test.

The facial nerve canal

The image volumes of PETRA, T2-SPACE and MPRAGE were reconstructed in axial image of 0.9 mm thickness by using syngo FUSION, and the visualization of the facial nerve canal was evaluated (Figure2). The facial nerve canals were divided into the four segments (labyrinthine, geniculate ganglion, tympanic, and mastoid). For each of the left and right facial nerve canal, a three-point scale was used: 0 = not visible, 1= partially visible, or 2= excellently visible. The scores were compared among PETRA, T2-SPACE and MPRAGE using Friedman test. A P value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

MR angiography

In the comparison of the MRAs, the scores of A3 and P3 and total scores of TOF-MRA were statistically better than PETRA-MRA (P=0.0049, 0.0425, 0.0040), and others didn’t have statistically differences (Figure3). PETRA-MRA showed significantly higher homogeneity of the signal at C (P=0.0010).

The facial nerve canal

In the comparison of the facial nerve canals, at labyrinthine, the scores of PETRA were best and there were significant differences between MPRAGE and PETRA. At geniculate ganglion and tympanic and the sum of four segments, the scores of PETRA and T2-SPACE were statistically better than MPRAGE. At mastoid, the scores of T2-SPACE were best and there were significant differences between MPRAGE and T2-SPACE (Figure4).

Discussions

PETRA-MRA was less visualized at the peripheral artery (A3, P3), but PETRA-MRA visualized intracranial arteries as good as TOF-MRA at the other parts. In the visualization of facial nerve canal, PETRA was better than MPRAGE at all segments and best at labyrinthine among all 3D sequences.

Conclusion

PETRA and PETRA-MRA were useful for the visualization of intracranial artery and facial nerve canal.

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Mr. Katutoshi Murata and Mr. Yuta Urushibata, Siemens Japan K.K., for their useful comments on this study. This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 25461815.

References

(1) Grodzki DM, Jakob PM, Heismann B. Ultrashort echo time imaging using pointwise encoding time reduction with radial acquisition (PETRA). Magn Reson Med. 2012 Feb;67(2):510-8.

(2)Ida M, Wakayama T, Nielsen ML, et al. Quiet T1-weighted imaging using PETRA: initial clinical evaluation in intracranial tumor patients. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Feb;41(2):447-53.

(3)Natsuaki Y, Bi X, Grodzki DM, et al. PETRA qMRA: Towards Zero-Flow Dephasing Intracranial Non-Contrast MR Angiography. Proc. ISMRM (2015)

Figures

Figure1. The MIP images of TOF-MRA and PETRA-MRA. The red circles are A1, M1, P1, the blue circles A2, M2, P2, the green circles A3, M3, P3, and the yellow circles M4, P4. Note the signal of PETRA-MRA is more homogenous than that of TOF-MRA especially at C (red arrows).

Figure2. (a-c) PETRA images demonstrate the labyrinthine (a: white arrow), geniculate ganglion (a: yellow arrow), tympanic (b: white arrow), and mastoid (c: white arrow) segments of the facial nerve. (d) SPACE and (e) MPRAGE demonstrate the facial nerve canal (yellow arrow).

Figure3. The scores of TOF-MRA and PETRA-MRA. TOF-MRA and PETRA-MRA showed similar visualization of arteries except A3 and P3.

Figure4. The scores of the visualization of facial nerve canal. At labyrinthine, the scores of PETRA were best. At geniculate ganglion and tympanic and the sum of four segments, the scores of PETRA and T2-SPACE were statistically better than MPRAGE. At mastoid, the scores of T2-SPACE were best.



Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 24 (2016)
1328