Cheng Li1, Alan C. Seifert2, Suzanne L. Wehrli3, and Felix W. Wehrli1
1Radiology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States, 2Translational and Molecular Imaging Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States, 3NMR Core Facility, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, United States
Synopsis
Myelin is
a lamellar liquid crystal consisting of a variety of phospholipids and
cholesterol, water and proteins. So far quantitative information on myelin
density has been obtained primarily indirectly via myelin water quantification
or quantitative magnetization transfer. Here, we examined 3D UTE and ZTE
methods at 400 MHz demonstrating the feasibility of MRI quantification of reconstituted
myelin suspended in D2O as well as of myelin in lamb spinal cord in situ. Results show the magnitude
signal amplitude to be linearly correlated with actual myelin content, allowing
estimation to be made of myelin fraction in neural tissues. Introduction
Myelin is essential
for proper functioning of the central nervous system. The ability to measure myelin
density noninvasively would
have a major impact on diagnosis and evaluation of diseases that are
responsible for much of CNS morbidity. The NMR spectral properties of myelin
have previously been shown to be consistent with a lamellar liquid crystal
yielding a Superlorentzian line shape with broad tails extending to about ±20
kHz, resulting in lifetimes of the transverse magnetization on the order of tens
of microseconds [1]. Here we examined the potential of 3D UTE and ZTE solid-state
MRI with long-T
2 suppression to quantify myelin in native lamb spinal cord using
reference samples containing various mass fractions of reconstituted myelin at
9.4T.
Methods
Sample Preparation: Myelin
was extracted from bovine spinal cord by a sucrose gradient technique[2] and suspended
in 99.9% D2O to achieve concentrations of 6%, 8%, 10%, 12% and 14%, contained
in 5mm NMR tubes serving as reference samples. A 36-mm segment of cervical
spinal cord was dissected from sheep and stored in H2O-phosphate
buffered saline until use.
Imaging Experiments: All experiments
were performed at 9.4T (Bruker Avance) with maximum gradient amplitude of 1,000
mT/m. Previous work showed the UTE signal amplitude to be strongly correlated
with the mass fraction of myelin suspended in D2O(R2=0.98) [1]. Here we investigated the potential of both
UTE and ZTE imaging for actual quantification of myelin in native neural tissue with
an experimental set-up similar to that used in [1]. Inclusion of ZTE was
motivated by earlier observations of its superior SNR relative to UTE [3]. A
commercial ZTE sequence was used to image the reference samples (TR=2ms, FA=4.1o,
2µs pulse duration, 3.2µs dwell time, 51,500 half-projections, 250×250×750µm3 resolution, scan time=1.7
min). The same samples were also scanned with a long-T2 suppressed IR-ZTE derived
from the commercial sequence after insertion of an adiabatic inversion pulse
preceding excitation. One half-radial spoke was scanned following each
inversion (TR=200ms and TI=70ms resulting in 3 hours for 51,500 half-projections).
To increase SNR, the excitation flip angle was set to 55o, which,
however, prolonged pulse duration to 25μs
and dwell time to 10μs.
Both ZTE and IR-ZTE image signals were regressed against myelin fraction of the
reference samples.
To quantify myelin in situ in the native lamb spinal cord, four pulse sequences (ZTE,
IR-ZTE, UTE and IR-UTE) were run along with the myelin reference samples using
the protocols described above except that excitation the flip angle of IR-UTE
was set to 90o to maximize the signal and spinal cord gray and white
matter (GM, WM) myelin fraction was estimated from the calibration equation
derived from the association between MR signals of the reference samples and
their myelin fractions.
Results
The ZTE
and IR-ZTE images of the reference samples are shown in Figs.1a and b. Both ZTE
and IR-ZTE signals are linearly correlated with the myelin fraction as expected
(R2=0.99 and R2=0.97, respectively, Figs.1c and d). SNR was ~25 in the ZTE image of 14% myelin/D2O
suspension. However, the IR-ZTE image suffers from inferior SNR (<5)
and blurring artifacts due to the much prolonged pulse duration and sampling window
(as a consequence of peak power limitation since the flip angle can only be
increased by prolonging pulse duration) .
Figs.2a-c show the spinal cord images
acquired with ZTE, UTE and IR-UTE. SNR of the ZTE, UTE and IR-UTE images of the
14% myelin/D2O suspension was 25, 8 and 15, respectively. GM-WM contrast
is substantially enhanced in IR-UTE relative to UTE due to the higher myelin content
in WM and suppression of long-T2 tissue water. From the linear relationship
between IR-UTE signals of reference samples and their myelin fractions (R2=0.97, Fig. 2d), an apparent WM myelin fraction of 22.3% is obtained.
However, since reconstituted myelin does not contain proteins (~30%), the
estimated myelin lipid fraction is ~16%. Further possible sources of error are other cell
membrane short-T2 tissue constituents as well as incomplete suppression of
long-T2 signal.
Conclusion
The
potential of UTE and ZTE MRI for direct myelin quantification was evaluated
on myelin extract and ex vivo lamb
spinal cord. In the present implementation, IR-preparation suppresses the
long-T
2 signal close to the background noise level and IR-UTE achieves the most
promising results. Although superior SNR is achieved with ZTE, long-T
2
suppressed IR-ZTE suffers from poor SNR inadequate for quantification due to
excitation flip angle limitations. Further work will focus on improvements on
long-T
2 suppressed ZTE imaging for directed myelin quantification, e.g. by
means of multiple readouts following each inversion, and maximizing flip angle
with phase-modulated pulses[4].
Acknowledgements
NIH Grant R21-NS082953, DOD Award W81XWH-10-1-0714. References
1.
Wilhelm MJ et al. PNAS 2012;109:9605-9610.
2. Norton WT et al. Methods Enzymol 1974;31:435-444.
3.
Seifert AC et al. NMR Biomed 2013;26:1158-1166.
4. Li C et al. IEEE TMI 2014;33:961-969.