Synopsis
This is an initial study of epilepsy patient scan
using 7T. This study serves as a starting point toward 7T clinical scanning. In
addition, it gives some insight as to current challenges and future work.Introduction
Epilepsy is a neurological disease
characterized by seizures[1]. One of
the options to treat seizure is surgery. Accurate identification of epileptic
lesion is therefore of great importance. T1-weighted MR imaging is
commonly used for surgical planning. When the epileptic lesions are small,
however, it is difficult to identify them at lower field strength.
Ultra-high field (UHF) leads to sub-millimeter
anatomic imaging in clinically reasonable scan time and has helped to correct
misinterpretations of scans performed on lower fields[2]. As the use of UHF expands, FDA approval of
7T MRI is upon us. Therefore, the importance of establishing protocols for 7T
clinical MR application is increasing.
In this work, we 1) demonstrate the
clinical superiority of in-vivo 7T imaging compared to lower field strength and
2) investigated tissue suppressed imaging techniques for identification of epileptic
lesion.
Methods
Epilepsy patients who have received
clinical diagnosis were scanned (IRB approved) at 7T MRI (Siemens) with a 32-receive
channel head coil (Nova Medical). MP2RAGE
[3]
sequence (Siemens), WM-suppressed and GM/WM boundary-suppressed
[4] images were collected. Scan parameters for MP2RAGE
are as follows: TR/TE/TI
1/TI
2=6000/2.99/800/2600ms,
flip angle=4°/5°, (0.75mm)
3-isotropic voxels and GRAPPA factor=3. Inversion
time (TI) of WM-suppressed and boundary-suppressed
[4] scans were optimized based on measured T
1 value
using inversion recovery (IR) prepared EPI sequence
[5,6]. The optimized TIs for WM-/boundary-suppressed
scans were 700 and 930ms respectively. Data were collected using MPRAGE
[7] sequence with same parameters as above except
for TI(=700/930ms) and flip angle(=5°).
Results
Figure 1 shows the
strength of 7T in an epilepsy patient. At 7T, a lesion was seen at the depth of
the parietal occipital fissure, superior to isthmus. The lesion was felt to be
likely malformation of cortical development and possibly polymicrogyria. The
patient’s seizure semiology could be explained by activation of the cortex
around the lesion. This lesion was not clearly seen at 3T. In this patient, the
7T images make substantial differences in the clinical care[8].
Figures 2 and 3
show the usefulness of WM-suppressed and boundary-suppressed technique,
respectively. T1 of epileptic lesions are larger than normal WM and
similar with T1 of GM/WM tissue border. In the WM-suppressed results(Fig.
2), the normal WM tissue was suppressed while the longer T1 lesion was
revealed with hyper-signal intensity (Fig. 2C,F). A patient with epileptic
lesion at the parietal-operculum is shown in Fig.3. Because of the intermediate T1 characteristics
of the lesion the suppressed border line was blurred near at the lesion(Fig. 3D,H).
Figure 4 shows
the challenge of 7T clinical imaging. In Figs. 4(A-C), the right hippocampus was
slightly decreased in size(red arrows), with T2*/FLAIR hyper-signal,
suggestive of hippocampal sclerosis; the right amigdala also showed T2*/FLAIR
hyper-intensity(green arrows). The right hippocampus, amygdala, para-hippocampal
gyrus, and temporal pole were resected and the patient became seizure-free.
Surgical pathology confirmed the existence of hippocampal sclerosis and
malformation of cortical development. Note that although the hippocampal
sclerosis was clearly seen, the malformation of cortical development in the
right para-hippocampal gyrus and temporal pole was not easily appreciable due
to signal loss.
Figures 4D-F are 7T results
from a patient with left temporal lobe seizures. Left mesial structure atrophy
in the head of the hippocampus (red arrows) and left temporal-pole blurring were
observed (yellow arrow). It was not clear whether the dimmer signal from the
left temporal-pole was due to technical issue or real pathology.
This patient underwent
a standard left temporal lobectomy including the left hippocampus and became
seizure-free. In surgical pathology, malformation of cortical development was
found in the left temporal-pole.
Discussions and Conclusions
In this work, we assessed the feasibility
of 7T MR imaging as a clinical application for the epilepsy patients. Compared to lower field MRI, 7T MRI generates higher
resolution and substantially improved anatomic image. These advantages can be
helped correct misinterpretations at lower field. Tissue signal suppression
using IR technique reveals the epileptic lesion with enhanced tissue contrast
particularly lesions are surrounded by the other tissues which have different T1.
However, low sensitivity and non-uniform tissue contrast,
caused by non-uniform B1 field, particularly in the temporal-pole
presents a challenge and limit clinical application.
Recently, parallel transmission MRI (pTx), utilized
with multiple-transmit coil elements, was proposed to address the
aforementioned non-uniform B1 issue particularly at UHF[9]. pTx system may improve image quality and
provide more accurate information for patient diagnoses. Future work will use pTx
to address these issues.
This is an initial study of epilepsy patient scan
using 7T. This study serves as a starting point toward 7T clinical scanning. In
addition, it gives some insight as to current challenges and future work.
Acknowledgements
Se-Hong Oh and Irene Wang contributed equally to this work. This
work was supported by Cleveland Clinic. Author gratefully acknowledges technical
support by Siemens Medical Solutions.References
[1] Chang BS,
Lowenstein DH (2003). "Epilepsy". N. Engl. J. Med. 349 (13): 1257–66
Clare and Jezzard, MRM,
2001, 45, 630
[2] Stephen E Jones, Se-Hong Oh, Erik Beall,
Michael Phillips, Ken Sakaie, Irene Wang, and Mark Lowe, “Examples of clinical
imaging at 7T: Successes and Challenges”, ISMRM, 2015, 767
[3] Marques JP, Kober
T, Krueger G, van der Zwaag W, Van de Moortele PF, Gruetter R. “MP2RAGE, a self
bias-field corrected sequence for improved segmentation and T1-mapping at high
field.”, Neuroimage, 2010, 49(2):1271-81
[4] Mauro Costagli,
Douglas A. C. Kelley, Mark R. Symms, Laura Biagi, Riccardo Stara, Eleonora
Maggioni, Gianluigi Tiberi, Carmen Barba, Renzo Guerrini, Mirco Cosottini, Michela
Tosetti, “Tissue Border Enhancement by inversion recovery MRI at 7.0 Tesla”, Neuroradiology,
2014, DOI 10.1007/s00234-014-1365-8
[5] Clare and Jezzard, “Rapid
T(1) mapping using multislice echo planar imaging”, MRM, 2001, 45(4), 630-4
[6] Grinstead and
Rooney, “Fast T1 mapping in human brain using inversion recovery EPI with
GRAPPA at 3T and 7T, ISMRM, 2008, 3084
[7] Mugler, J.P.,
Brookeman, J.R., 1990. Three-dimensional magnetization-prepared rapid gradient-echo imaging (3D MP RAGE). Magn.
Reson. Med. 15, 152–157.
[8] Tellez-Zenteno JF,
Hernandez Ronquillo L, Moien-Afshari F, Wiebe S. Surgical outcomes in lesional
and non-lesional epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Epilepsy Res.
2010;89(2-3):310-8.
[9] Yudong Zhu, “Parallel
excitation with an array of transmit coils”, MRM, 2004, 51(4):775-84