Man Xu1, Xiangliang Tan2, Patrick Peng GAO3, Ed.X. Wu3,4, Yingjie Mei1,5, Xixi Zhao2, Yikai Xu2, and Yanqiu Feng1,3,4
1School of Biomedical Engineering and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Medical Image Processing, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China, People's Republic of, 2Department of Medical Imaging Center, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China, People's Republic of, 3Laboratory of Biomedical Imaging and Signal Processing, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China, People's Republic of, 4Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China, People's Republic of, 5Philips Healthcare, Guangzhou, China, People's Republic of
Synopsis
The
character of the brain structural connectivity in patients with non-neuropsychiatric
systemic lupus erythematosus (non-NPSLE) has not been well studied. The aim of
the study was to investigate the alterations of the
topological metrics in non-NPSLE networks and to identify the regions in which
the metrics were significantly different. A structural connectivity matrix was
constructed for each subject using PANDA toolbox. Then graph theoretical
analysis was applied to investigate the alteration of the metrics. The results revealed
that the non-NPSLE group exhibited a trend of decreased global network
properties and changed betweenness and degree in several brain regions.Target audience
MRI
researchers and clinicians who are interested in the field of diffusion imaging and
brain connectivity.
Introduction
Decreased
white matter integrity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) has been
revealed in several previous researches [1, 2]. However, little is known
about the changes of the brain structural connectivity in this patient group, especially
those without neuropsychiatric symptoms (non-NPSLE). Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI)
enables us to construct comprehensive structural networks throughout the entire
brain by utilizing the white matter fiber tractography. The aim of this study was to investigate
the alterations of the topological metrics in the structural
networks of non-NPSLE patients based on a graph theoretical method.
Materials and Methods
Thirty-two adults diagnosed with
non-NPSLE and 31 age- and gender-comparable healthy control subjects were
recruited. DTI data acquisition was performed on a Philips
3.0-T Achieva MRI scanner with an 8-channel head coil for receiving by employing
a single-shot spin-echo EPI sequence. Diffusion tensor imaging parameters
included TR=9737 ms, TE=88 ms, 112×112 matrix, 224 mm×224 mm FOV, 75 axial contiguous 2.0 mm
slices, 32 diffusion orientations with b-value=1000 s/mm2.
3D-T1WI data were acquired using gradient echo FFE sequence. The acquisition
parameters included TR=9 ms, TE=4 ms, 256×256 matrix, 256 mm×256 mm FOV, a total of 176 sagittal 1.0 mm slices.
All acquired MRI images were processed using Pipeline
for Analyzing braiN Diffusion imAges (PANDA) ( http://www.nitrc.org/projects/panda/) [3]. The raw DTI data were preprocessed by correcting the head
movement and eddy current distortions, and the images were nonlinearly
normalized into standard Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) space. The 3D-T1MR
images of each participant were segmented into 116 cortical and subcortical
brain regions according to the automatic anatomical labeling (AAL) template.
Then whole-brain deterministic tractography was performed to calculate the
number of streamlines linking each pair of regions. This resulted in a 116×116 structural
connectivity matrix for each subject.
Graph theoretical analysis
was applied to investigate the alteration of the network connectivity between
patient group and healthy controls. For all the generated connectivity
matrixes, a series of network topological metrics including normalized
clustering coefficient, normalized characteristic path length, small-world
index, nodal betweenness centrality and nodal degree were calculated across a
user-defined density range of 0.09-0.125 with an interval of 0.001 using graph
analysis toolbox (GAT) [4]. After this, functional data analysis (FDA) in GAT was used to
alleviate the sensitivity of the comparison to the thresholding process. A
nonparametric permutation test was then conducted on the FDA results to reveal statistically
significant differences. Lastly, the network hubs as the crucial components for
efficient communication were quantified from FDA analysis of the betweenness
and degree curves.
Results
Figure
1 shows the global network measurements. The non-NPSLE group exhibited a
tendency of decreased normalized clustering coefficient, decreased normalized
path length and decreased small-world index across the final selected density
range, though the results were
not statistically significant. Figure 2 shows the regional network measurements
using FDA analysis. Several brain regions with changed degree and betweenness
were revealed. Specifically, Precuneus_L, Temporal_Pole_Sup_R, Cerebelum_Crus_L
presented significantly higher betweenness in non-NPSLE group, while the Occipital_Inf_L
and Temporal_Mid_R showed significantly lower betweenness in non-NPSLE group. Meanwhile,
frontal_Mid_Orb_L, Precuneus_L, Putamen_R, Temporal_Pole_Sup_R presented significantly
higher nodal degree in non-NPLSE group while Cingulum_Post_R, Temporal_Mid_R, Vermis_9
showed lower nodal degree in non-NPSLE group (Table1). However, note that none
of these regions survived after the false discovery rate (FDR) correction.
Seven and six hub nodes using betweenness, and four and five hub nodes using
degree were identified for the non-NPSLE and HC groups, respectively (Table 2).
Discussion
and conclusion
In this study, we investigated the
topological metric alteration in non-NPSLE patients through a graph
theoretical analysis and three main findings were presented. The first major
finding was the trend of decreased global network properties. This suggested a
more segregated configuration of the structural networks in non-NPLSE patients.
The second was the significantly changed betweenness centrality and degree in
several brain regions of the patient group. This might
facilitate our understanding of the neuropathological mechanism of non-NPSLE.
The third was the identification of the hubs of the two groups. Overall,
the graph theoretical analysis can be a
promising method for analyzing the brain networks of systemic lupus
erythematosus.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1] Schmidt-WilckeT.,et al.Neuroimage.Clinical.
2014; 5: 291-7.
[2] Emmer B.J.,et al.Arthritis and
rheumatism. 2010; 62: 3716-21.
[3] CuiZ.,et al. Frontiers in human
neuroscience. 2013; 7, 42.
[4]HosseiniSMH, et al.
PLoS one. 2012; 7(7): e40709.