Suresh Emmanuel Joel1, Radhika Madhavan1, Rakesh Mullick1, Sumit Niogi2, John A Tsiouris2, Luca Marinelli3, and Teena Shetty4
1Diagnostic Imaging and Biomedical Technologies, General Electric Global Research, Bangalore, India, 2Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States, 3Diagnostic Imaging and Biomedical Technologies, General Electric Global Research, Niskayuna, NY, United States, 4Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, United States
Synopsis
Patients
who suffer from mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) have cognitive and
behavioral deficits though MR and CT appear normal. Functional neuroimaging has
high promise to provide biomarkers which may enable better prognosis and
therapy of mTBI. The work here shows in a large sample (78 mTBI patients and 26
controls in 3 sessions spanning 3 months from injury), significant correlation
between functional connectivity in visual, motor and default mode networks and
self-reported symptom scores. Given this association, functional connectivity
stands to be an important contributor to predict mTBI outcome.Introduction
Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is a
sub-type of traumatic brain injury when loss of consciousness and
disorientation is shorter than 30 minutes. Though brain imaging with MR
and CT often appear normal, the patient sustains long-term cognitive
difficulties such as headache, blurry vision, memory problems, attention
deficits, mood swings and frustration
1. Empirical evidence suggests that immediately
after injury, there is time window when the patient is vulnerable to more
serious brain damage should another impact occur
2. It is critical to know if the patient is out
of this vulnerable time window, specifically in sports
3 and military
4. In this study, we want to find functional
connectivity biomarkers that are associated with mTBI symptoms with the
eventual goal of these biomarkers contributing to predicting mTBI patient’s
outcome and recovery.
Methods & Materials
After
obtaining informed consent, rs-fMRI was recorded from 78 patients at four time
points (3 days, 7 days, 1 month and 3 months) after mTBI and 26 healthy
controls (2 sessions, 1 week apart). After eliminating missing and noisy data,
we analyzed 184 time points in total. Using GE 3T MRI scanner, multi-band (acceleration
factor 3) 2D-EPI, TR/TE = 900/30 ms was acquired for 6 minutes (395 volumes),
with 1.875 mm^2 in-plane resolution and 3 mm slice thickness to cover the whole
brain. T1-weighted scan (1 mm resolution) was acquired at each time point. All
participants filled a neurophysiological self-assessment questionnaire that was
used to calculate symptom severity scores
5.
rs-fMRI
data were motion corrected, rigid registered to T1-weighted image, non-rigid
registered to MNI atlas, nuisance removed using aCompCor
6, spatial
smoothed using Gaussian filter (FWHM 4mm) and temporally band-pass filtered (0.01
-0.1 Hz) using custom built software.
13 seed based functional
connectivity maps were extracted for all subjects. MNI seed locations are
listed in Table 1. Correlation of each voxel’s connectivity map value to symptom
score was computed using SPM multiple regression factorial design. Statistical
significance (p<0.05) was estimated after correcting for multiple
comparisons using cluster size threshold.
Results
Normal appearing functional networks were
obtained for all seeds. Correlation with symptom score revealed increased
connectivity between left executive control network (LECN) and default mode
network (DMN) regions in patients with higher symptom scores (Figure 1a). Motor
region (left face area) connectivity to primary visual areas decreased as
symptom score increased (Figure 1b). The same motor region’s connections to
dorsal motor area including torso area were negatively associated with symptom
score (Figure 1 b). Dorsal motor region (left hand knob area) connectivity to
DMN (IPL) was positively correlated to symptom score (Figure 1c). Primary
visual network connectivity to higher order visual regions was strongly
correlated with symptom scores (Figure 1d). We failed to detect significant
connectivity associated with symptom scores in other networks.
Discussion
Functional
connectivities between LECN, DMN, motor and visual networks seem to be affected
by mTBI and are associated with symptom scores. LECN (and other task positive
networks) are typically anti-correlated with the DMN
7,8 in health. In mTBI, we notice an
increase in the correlation as the symptom score increases perhaps due to a
breakdown of the competitiveness between these networks. Connectivity between
the primary and secondary visual networks also appears to increase with symptom
score. This increase in visual region connectivity has been shown when subjects
become aware of stimuli
9 and top-down
attention also has an influence in this connectivity
10; implying mTBI patients with
higher scores are perhaps explicitly paying more attention to external stimuli.
Motor region seemed to increase connectivity to DMN and decrease connectivity
to visual regions as the score increases. This probably shows that motor system
is less influenced by external stimuli (from visual network) and more
influenced by introspective inputs from the DMN.
In the current analysis,
correction for multiple measures from the same subject over time was not
performed. Using only one session from each subject produces similar results.
Conclusions
The work here shows in a large sample,
significant correlation between functional connectivity in visual, motor and
default mode networks and self-reported symptom scores. Given this association,
functional connectivity will be an important contributor to predict mTBI
outcome. Future work includes probing visual, motor and attention
sub-symptom-scores’ association with the corresponding networks. We are also
performing longitudinal analysis of connectivities within each specific patient
to enable outcome and recovery prediction.
Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. TBI: Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Symptoms |
Concussions | Mild Head Injuries | Resources and Support. at
<http://www.traumaticbraininjury.com/symptoms-of-tbi/mild-tbi-symptoms/>
2. CDC -
Feel Better - Concussion - Traumatic Brain Injury - Injury Center. at
<http://www.cdc.gov/concussion/feel_better.html>
3. NFL.com
- Official Site of the National Football League. at
<http://www.nflhealthplaybook.com/article/nfl-return-to-play-protocol?ref=0ap3000000381612>
4. Traumatic
Brain Injury | The United States Army. at <http://www.army.mil/tbi>
5. McCrory,
P. Sport concussion assessment tool 2. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 19,
452 (2009).
6. Behzadi,
Y., Restom, K., Liau, J. & Liu, T. T. A component based noise correction
method (CompCor) for BOLD and perfusion based fMRI. NeuroImage 37,
90–101 (2007).
7. Fox,
M. D. et al. The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic,
anticorrelated functional networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 102,
9673–9678 (2005).
8. Kelly,
A. M. C., Uddin, L. Q., Biswal, B. B., Castellanos, F. X. & Milham, M. P.
Competition between functional brain networks mediates behavioral variability. NeuroImage
39, 527–537 (2008).
9. Haynes,
J.-D., Driver, J. & Rees, G. Visibility reflects dynamic changes of
effective connectivity between V1 and fusiform cortex. Neuron 46,
811–821 (2005).
10. Al-Aidroos,
N., Said, C. P. & Turk-Browne, N. B. Top-down attention switches coupling
between low-level and high-level areas of human visual cortex. Proc. Natl.
Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 109, 14675–14680 (2012).